McWilliams v. Rojas et al - Prisoner Civil Rights
Summary
Nathan B. McWilliams, a prisoner, filed a civil rights complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against prison officials Jeffrey MaCamber and Cythina Rojas. The complaint, filed on April 8, 2026, references federal question jurisdiction related to prisoner prison conditions. The case was assigned to Judge Richard Seeborg in San Francisco.
What changed
Prisoner Nathan B. McWilliams initiated civil litigation by filing a complaint alleging civil rights violations related to prison conditions against two named defendants. The complaint was filed along with a consent/declination document regarding proceeding before a U.S. Magistrate Judge.
Affected parties include the plaintiff prisoner and the named defendant prison officials. This filing establishes the case but does not impose immediate obligations on outside entities. Compliance counsel should note this as a routine case filing in the prison civil rights space without current implications for regulated industries.
What to do next
- Monitor case for defendant responses and court orders
- Track any developments regarding consent to magistrate jurisdiction
Archived snapshot
Apr 9, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
McWilliams v. Rojas et al
Case Number: 3:26-cv-02984-RS Judge: Seeborg, Richard Location: San Francisco Case Type: Civil Case Basis: Federal Question Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition Date Filed:
April 8, 2026
Last Filing Date:
April 8, 2026
View Publicly Available Documents Case Summary No summary of this case is available
Recent Filings
| Date Filed | Docket Number | Document Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 04-08-26 | 1 | COMPLAINT against Jefferey MaCamber, Cythina Rojas. Filed by Nathan B. McWilliams. (kam2, COURT STAFF) |
| 04-08-26 | 2 | CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Nathan B. McWilliams.. (kam2, COURT STAFF) |
Return to top
Related changes
Get daily alerts for NDCA Recently Filed Documents
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from NDCA.
The plain-English summary, classification, and "what to do next" steps are AI-generated from the original text. Cite the source document, not the AI analysis.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when NDCA Recently Filed Documents publishes new changes.