Oren v. State - Mandamus Denied
Summary
The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin), denied the petition for writ of mandamus filed by John Oren and Elise Oren seeking relief from the State of Texas. The court provided no substantive analysis, citing only Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(a) as the basis for denial.
What changed
The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, denied the petition for writ of mandamus filed by John Oren and Elise Oren in connection with a proceeding from Travis County. The court issued a memorandum opinion citing Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(a) as the basis for denial, without elaboration or detailed reasoning.
This denial has no precedential value beyond the parties involved and does not establish new legal standards. No compliance actions are required. The decision is final and not subject to further appeal at this level.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Lead Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 27, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
In Re John Oren and Elise Oren v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 03-26-00145-CV
- Nature of Suit: Mandamus
Disposition: Motion or Writ Denied
Disposition
Motion or Writ Denied
Lead Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-26-00145-CV
In re John Oren and Elise Oren
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump
Filed: March 27, 2026
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Texas Court of Appeals publishes new changes.