Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Oregon Supreme Court Issues Three Opinions on C...
Routine Enforcement Added Final

Oregon Supreme Court Issues Three Opinions on Criminal and Civil Matters

Favicon for www.courts.oregon.gov Oregon Supreme Court Opinions
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The Oregon Supreme Court issued three opinions on April 9, 2026: State v. Shine (S071383, 375 Or 112), State v. Hutchings (S072024, 375 Or 132), and Kulongoski/Paden v. Rayfield (S072640, 375 Or 150). The opinions address criminal proceedings in the State v. Shine and State v. Hutchings matters, and a civil dispute in Kulongoski/Paden v. Rayfield. All three opinions are now published in the Oregon Reports.

What changed

The Oregon Supreme Court published three opinions on April 9, 2026, marking final judicial determinations in two criminal cases and one civil matter. The opinions are now part of the official Oregon Reports (375 Or), establishing precedential authority for future cases.

Legal professionals, courts, and parties involved in related matters should review these opinions for their precedential value. Criminal defendants and their counsel should monitor State v. Shine and State v. Hutchings for implications on pending appeals or sentencing matters. Civil practitioners should review Kulongoski/Paden v. Rayfield for its effect on ongoing or future civil litigation involving similar issues.

What to do next

  1. Review the published opinions for precedent relevant to pending or future cases
  2. Notify criminal defense counsel of State v. Shine and State v. Hutchings holdings
  3. Notify litigation counsel of Kulongoski/Paden v. Rayfield ruling if client is involved

Archived snapshot

Apr 10, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Collections

Select All Collections Briefs -- Oregon Court of Appeals Briefs -- Oregon Supreme Court Decisions & Orders -- Oregon Tax Court District Attorney Public Records Orders Multnomah Presiding Judge Orders Show All Cancel Update

Type

opinion (3)

Author

bushong (1) garrett (1)

Parties

state of oregon (2) dan rayfield (1) derek mitchell shine (1) joshua daniel hutchings (1) kelsey paden (1) ted kulongoski (1)

Searching items in:

Opinions -- Oregon Supreme Court

Sort by:

Results per page:

Search Terms:

2026-04-09

Records 1-3 of 3

S071383, Opinion

State v. Shine 375 Or 112 2026-04-09

S072024, Opinion

State v. Hutchings 375 Or 132 2026-04-09

S072640, Opinion

Kulongoski / Paden v. Rayfield 375 Or 150 2026-04-09

Records 1-3 of 3

Get daily alerts for Oregon Supreme Court Opinions

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from OR Supreme Court.

What's AI-generated?

The plain-English summary, classification, and "what to do next" steps are AI-generated from the original text. Cite the source document, not the AI analysis.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
OR Supreme Court
Filed
April 9th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
375 Or 112, 375 Or 132, 375 Or 150
Docket
S071383 S072024 S072640

Who this affects

Applies to
Courts Criminal defendants Legal professionals
Industry sector
9211 Government & Public Administration
Activity scope
Criminal appeals Civil litigation Court judgments
Geographic scope
US-OR US-OR

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Criminal Justice Civil Rights

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Oregon Supreme Court Opinions publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!