Ballot Title Certified as Modified for Initiative Petition 55 (2026)

Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 9, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Kulongoski / Paden v. Rayfield

Oregon Supreme Court

• Citations: 375 Or. 150
• Docket Number: S072640

• Disposition: The ballot title is certified as modified.

• Opinion

• Authorities (1)

• Cited By (0)

• Summaries (0)

• Similar Cases (0)

• PDF

Disposition

The ballot title is certified as modified.

Combined Opinion

150 April 9, 2026 No. 18

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE
STATE OF OREGON

Ted KULONGOSKI,
Cheri Helt, Drew Kaza, Phil Keisling, Max Williams,
Jordan Baxter, Jason Freilinger, Seth Woolley,
Greg Bourget, Chuck Sheketoff, Ken Hector,
Jeremy Rogers, and Charlie Conrad,
Petitioners,
v.
Dan RAYFIELD,
Attorney General, State of Oregon,
Respondent.
(SC S072640 (Control))
Kelsey PADEN,
Petitioner,
v.
Dan RAYFIELD,
Attorney General, State of Oregon,
Respondent.
(S072641)

En Banc
On petitions to review ballot title filed on January 30,
2026; considered and under advisement on March 17, 2026.
Daniel W. Meek, Portland, filed the petition and reply
for petitioners Ted Kulogoski, Cheri Helt, Drew Kaza, Phil
Keisling, Max Williams, Jordan Baxter, Jason Freilinger,
Seth Woolley, Greg Bourget, Chuck Sheketoff, Ken Hector,
Jeremy Rogers, and Charlie Conrad.
Lydia Anderson-Dana, Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting &
Schlachter, P.C., Portland, filed the petition and reply for
petitioner Kelsey Paden.
Gregory A. Rios, Assistant Attorney General, Salem,
filed the answering memoranda for respondent. Also on the
memoranda were Dan Rayfield, Attorney General, and Paul
L. Smith, Solicitor General.
Cite as 375 Or 150 (2026) 151

Daniel W. Meek, Portland, filed the memorandum for
amici curiae Cheri Helt, Drew Kaza, Seth Woolley, Steven
B. Ungar, Billy J. Williams, Ron Silver, and Jeremy Gruber
in S072641.
PER CURIAM
The ballot title is certified as modified.
152 Kulongoski / Paden v. Rayfield

PER CURIAM
These consolidated ballot title review proceed-
ings brought under ORS 250.085(2) concern the Attorney
General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 55 (2026)
(IP 55). If enacted, IP 55 would change procedures for elec-
tions—mostly primary elections. Chief petitioners and oth-
ers challenge all sections of the Attorney General’s certified
ballot title, while petitioner Paden challenges the caption.
We review the Attorney General’s certified ballot
title to determine whether it substantially complies with
ORS 250.035. ORS 250.085(5). Having considered petition-
ers’ challenges and the Attorney General’s responses to
those challenges, we conclude that the certified ballot title
substantially complies with the statutory requirements and
exercise our discretion to correct what the parties have char-
acterized as a typographical error in the certified summary.
Chief petitioners assert that the third sentence in
the summary contains a typographical error that results in
an incomprehensible clause. The Attorney General agrees
and submits that the issue can be addressed within the
word limits with a minor revision to the fifth sentence of
the summary. The summary, as drafted by the Attorney
General, provides:
“Amends constitution. Currently, legislature has consti-
tutional authority to set methods by which candidates are
nominated for the general election. Major parties nominate
candidates to general election through primaries where only
registered-party voters may participate; minor parties and
unaffiliated candidates directly for general election. Measure
replaces that system for most partisan offices, including
many state, federal (not presidential), and other designated
local public offices. Primary election ballot will list candidates
for each office in who participate in primary. Parties can opt
out and nominate candidates to general election at private
expense. Voters may vote for candidates regardless of voter’s
party affiliation or non-affiliation. Top two candidates from
each office appear on general election ballot; candidates may
accept up to three party endorsements. Other provisions.”
(Emphases added.) The Attorney General suggests that
the insertion of the word “nominate” between “candidates
Cite as 375 Or 150 (2026) 153

directly” would clarify the concern identified by chief peti-
tioners. And he suggests removing the first use of the word
“in” from the fifth sentence to accomplish that change. With
those changes, the two sentences would read: “Major parties
nominate candidates to general election through primaries
where only registered-party voters may participate; minor
parties and unaffiliated candidates nominate directly for
general election. * * * Primary election ballot will list candi-
dates for each office who participate in primary.”
Although we ordinarily refer a ballot title to the
Attorney General for modification, this court has statutory
authority to modify a ballot title and certify the modified
ballot title to the Secretary of State, and we exercise our
discretion to do so here. See ORS 250.085(8) (explaining that
this court may modify and certify to the Secretary of State
or refer to the Attorney General for modification); Straube/
McEvilly v. Myers, 340 Or 395, 133 P3d 897 (2006) (exercis-
ing discretion to correct a typographical error and certify a
corrected ballot title to the Secretary of State).
With those corrections, we certify to the Secretary
of State the Attorney General’s ballot title for IP 55 as
modified:
Amends Constitution: Changes primary election
processes for most partisan offices: single primary
ballot, top two candidates advance
Result of “Yes” Vote: “Yes” vote amends constitu-
tion, changes primary election processes for most partisan
offices, allows nonaffiliated voter participation; candidates
listed on one ballot, top two advance.
Result of “No” Vote: “No” vote retains current pri-
mary election system, legislature’s authority to set nomi-
nation methods; retains current procedures for nomination
of minor political party and nonaffiliated candidates.
Summary: Amends constitution. Currently, legislature
has constitutional authority to set methods by which candi-
dates are nominated for the general election. Major parties
nominate candidates to general election through primaries
where only registered-party voters may participate; minor
parties and unaffiliated candidates nominate directly for
general election. Measure replaces that system for most
154 Kulongoski / Paden v. Rayfield

partisan offices, including many state, federal (not presi-
dential), and other designated local public offices. Primary
election ballot will list candidates for each office who par-
ticipate in primary. Parties can opt out and nominate can-
didates to general election at private expense. Voters may
vote for candidates regardless of voter’s party affiliation or
non-affiliation. Top two candidates from each office appear
on general election ballot; candidates may accept up to
three party endorsements. Other provisions.
The ballot title is certified as modified.