Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Opposition Sustained: Sun Bum LLC v. Rum Bum Ta...
Priority review Enforcement Amended Final

Opposition Sustained: Sun Bum LLC v. Rum Bum Tanning Co.

Favicon for changeflow.com TTAB Proceedings
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board sustained Opposition No. 91303585, ruling in favor of Sun Bum LLC and preventing registration of the trademark RUM BUM TANNING CO by defendant Daniel Miller. The opposition was filed on December 8, 2025, and decided on April 22, 2026. The decision prevents the defendant from obtaining federal trademark registration for the contested mark.

Why this matters

Trademark applicants and their counsel should conduct comprehensive likelihood-of-confusion analyses before filing applications. The sustained opposition demonstrates that TTAB will scrutinize marks with phonetic and conceptual similarity, particularly in overlapping commercial contexts (sun care products and tanning services).

AI-drafted from the source document, validated against GovPing's analyst note standards . For the primary regulatory language, read the source document .
Published by USPTO TTAB on changeflow.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors TTAB Proceedings for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 73 changes logged to date.

What changed

The TTAB sustained the opposition filed by Sun Bum LLC against Daniel Miller's application to register the trademark RUM BUM TANNING CO. This final decision prevents the defendant from securing federal trademark protection for the contested mark.

Parties seeking to register trademarks should ensure their marks do not create likelihood of confusion with existing registered marks in the same or related classes. Sun Bum LLC's successful opposition confirms that marks with similar sound, appearance, or commercial impression to existing brands face significant registration hurdles at the TTAB.

Archived snapshot

Apr 23, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

← USPTO TTAB Proceedings

Opposition: RUM BUM TANNING CO

Opposition TTAB91303585-20260422 Kind: OPP Apr 22, 2026

Abstract

BD DECISION: OPP SUSTAINED
Plaintiff: Sun Bum LLC
Defendant: Daniel Miller
Mark at issue: RUM BUM TANNING CO

Filing Date

2025-12-08

View original document →

Get daily alerts for TTAB Proceedings

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from USPTO TTAB.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
USPTO TTAB
Filed
April 22nd, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Branch
Judicial
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Docket
91303585

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals Investors Retailers
Industry sector
8121 Personal Care Services
Activity scope
Trademark registration Trademark opposition IP enforcement
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Intellectual Property
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Consumer Protection Trade Regulation

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when TTAB Proceedings publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!