USPTO TTAB Decision: Opposition Sustained for ERAZER Mark
Summary
The USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) sustained an opposition filed by Razor USA LLC against Guangzhou Xianfeng Baiying E-commerce Co., Ltd. regarding the ERAZER mark. The decision, dated March 18, 2026, indicates a ruling in favor of the opposer.
What changed
The USPTO's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) has issued a decision sustaining an opposition (TTAB91302546) filed by Razor USA LLC against Guangzhou Xianfeng Baiying E-commerce Co., Ltd. The opposition concerned the registration of the mark "ERAZER." This ruling signifies that the TTAB found sufficient grounds to prevent the registration of the contested mark by the defendant.
This decision has direct implications for Guangzhou Xianfeng Baiying E-commerce Co., Ltd., preventing them from registering the ERAZER mark. For Razor USA LLC, this is a successful outcome in their brand protection efforts. Compliance officers in the e-commerce and manufacturing sectors should note this decision as an example of how trademark oppositions are adjudicated, potentially impacting their own brand strategies and due diligence when selecting new marks.
What to do next
- Review TTAB decision TTAB91302546 for specific findings and implications.
- Assess potential impact on existing or planned product branding and trademark portfolios.
- Consult with legal counsel regarding any direct or indirect effects on business operations.
Archived snapshot
Mar 23, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Opposition: ERAZER
Opposition TTAB91302546-20260318 Kind: OPP Mar 18, 2026
Abstract
BD DECISION: OPP SUSTAINED
Plaintiff: Razor USA LLC
Defendant: Guangzhou Xianfeng Baiying E-commerce Co., Ltd.
Mark at issue: ERAZER
Filing Date
2025-10-20
Related changes
Get daily alerts for TTAB Proceedings
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from USPTO.
The plain-English summary, classification, and "what to do next" steps are AI-generated from the original text. Cite the source document, not the AI analysis.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when TTAB Proceedings publishes new changes.