WIPO Madrid System: Declarations for Netherlands and United Kingdom
Summary
WIPO has updated its Madrid System Member Declarations to include new declarations from The Netherlands and the United Kingdom. The Netherlands' declaration details provisions for the Common Office of Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands under Article 9quater of the Protocol.
What changed
WIPO has announced the addition of new member state declarations to the Madrid System, specifically for The Netherlands and the United Kingdom. The Netherlands' declaration includes details regarding the Common Office of Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands, as outlined in Article 9quater of the Protocol. A separate declaration has also been made by the Government of the United Kingdom.
These updates are informational and provide clarity on specific national requirements within the international trademark registration system. Businesses utilizing the Madrid System for trademark protection in these countries should review these declarations to ensure compliance with any specific national provisions or accommodations related to trademark filings and management.
What to do next
- Review updated Madrid System Member Declarations for The Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
- Consult the Madrid System Members PDF for specific details on the declarations.
Source document (simplified)
Page: WIPO Madrid Member Declarations
Change summary: New declarations have been added for The Netherlands, including details about the Common Office of Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands under Article 9quater of the Protocol. Additionally, a new declaration has been made by the Government of the United Kingdom. You can find more details in the Madrid System Members PDF (https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/docs/pdf/madrid_marks.pdf).
[INSERTS] Declarations made by the Government of The Netherlands (footnote 11, list of Madrid System Members)
[INSERTS] Common Office of Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands under Article 9quater of the Protocol
[INSERTS] Declaration made by the Government of the United Kingdom (footnote 16, list of Madrid System Members)
Page context:
Madrid Protocol and Regulations: Declarations and Notifications by Madrid System Members
(Last update: March 15, 2026)
Madrid System members can make certain declarations and notifications to ensure that the international trademark registration system accommodates their own domestic requirements. It is important to consider these declarations and notifications when seeking overseas protection of your trademark.
Find out more…
- Learn all about domestic laws, practices, and procedures in our member profiles available under eMadrid https://madrid.wipo.int/reference/
- Madrid System legal texts https://www.wipo.int/en/web/madrid-system/legal_texts/index
| Subject | Description | Reference [legal texts] | Madrid System member |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Division / merger of international trademark registrations | Division not provided for under domestic law. | Rule 27bis(6) | Antigua and Barbuda, Bahrain, Belize, Brazil, Cabo Verde, China, Curaçao, France, Georgia, Grenada, Indonesia, Liberia, Madagascar, Mexico, Qatar, San Marino, Sint Maarten (Dutch part), Thailand, Türkiye, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates |
| Rule 27bis(1) is not compatible with domestic law, i.e., does not apply. | Rule 40(6) | Australia, Germany, Iceland, India, Ireland, Japan, Samoa, Syrian Arab Republic, United States of America, Viet Nam |
| Merger not provided for under domestic law. | Rule 27ter(2)(b) | Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, Austria, Bahrain, Belarus, Belize, Benelux, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cabo Verde, Chile, China, Colombia, Curaçao, Czech Republic, Estonia, European Union, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Grenada, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Japan, Liberia, Madagascar, Mexico, Pakistan, Poland, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, San Marino, Sint Maarten (Dutch part), Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Syrian Arab Republic, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Türkiye, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United States of America, Viet Nam |
| Rule 27ter(2)(a) is not compatible with domestic law, i.e., does not apply. | Rule 40(6) | Cuba, Samoa |
| Fees | Individual fees apply. | Article 8(7)(a) of the Protocol | African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI), Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Australia, Bahrain, Bailiwick of Guernsey1, Belarus, Belize, Benelux2, Bonaire, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Curaçao3, Denmark, Estonia, European Union, Finland, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Mauritius, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Philippines, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Saint Eustatius and Saba3, Samoa, San Marino, Singapore, Sint Maarten (Dutch part)3, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab ...
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when WIPO Madrid Member Declarations publishes new changes.