Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Attorney Grievance Commission v. Julian Arnold ...
Priority review Enforcement Amended Final

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Julian Arnold Haffner - Disciplinary Action

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com Maryland Supreme Court
Filed March 20th, 2026
Detected March 20th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Maryland Supreme Court has suspended Julian Arnold Haffner for 60 days from the practice of law, followed by one year of probation. This disciplinary action stems from violations of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Rules of Professional Conduct.

What changed

The Maryland Supreme Court issued an order suspending attorney Julian Arnold Haffner for 60 days and placing him on probation for one year. This action is a consequence of Haffner's violations of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Rules of Professional Conduct.

This suspension directly impacts Haffner's ability to practice law in Maryland and requires adherence to probation terms. Other legal professionals should note this disciplinary action as an example of the consequences for violating USPTO professional conduct rules, particularly those involving patent and trademark law practice. The Clerk of the Court is mandated to send notice of this order.

What to do next

  1. Comply with the 60-day suspension from the practice of law.
  2. Adhere to the one-year probation period following the suspension.

Penalties

60-day suspension from the practice of law, followed by one year of probation.

Source document (simplified)

Jump To

Top Caption Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 20, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Haffner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Combined Opinion

  • IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION
  •   SUPREME COURT
    
  •   OF MARYLAND
    

    v.

  •   AG No. 28
    

    JULIAN ARNOLD HAFFNER

  •   September Term, 2025
    

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action and

request for 60-day suspension filed by the petitioner pursuant to Rule 19-737(f), and

upon consideration of the parties’ responses to the Court’s order to show cause, it is

this 20th day of March 2026, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that, as corresponding discipline, the Respondent, Julian Arnold

Haffner, is suspended for 60 days from the practice of law in Maryland, to be

followed by one year of probation, for violations of the United States Patent and

Trademark Office Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall send notice of this Order in

accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader
Chief Justice

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal
Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State
Government Article) this document is authentic.

2026.03.20
'00'04- 11:31:14
Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
MD Courts
Filed
March 20th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Document ID
AG No. 28 / March 20, 2026
Docket
28ag/25

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals
Industry sector
5411 Legal Services
Activity scope
Legal Practice
Geographic scope
US-MD US-MD

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Legal Ethics Professional Conduct

Get Courts & Legal alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Maryland Supreme Court publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.