Law Commission Consults on UK Consumer Class Actions Expansion
Summary
The Law Commission of England and Wales announced a new project on 20 April 2026, following a government request to assess whether consumer law enforcement could be strengthened through a consumer class actions regime. The project will explore extending the Competition Appeal Tribunal's opt-out mechanism, currently limited to competition law breaches, to broader consumer claims, with the Civil Procedure Rules r.19.8 representative action procedure identified as inadequate for many claimants. Due to automatic inclusion of large class members, opt-out claims can result in significantly higher aggregate damages and costs for defendant businesses, with stakeholder input invited until 30 October 2026 ahead of a formal consultation paper.
“The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) regime allows true 'opt-out' claims – in other words where a representative claimant pursues a claim on behalf of a class of others who do not need to take any positive steps to join the claim – but this procedural regime is only currently available in cases involving competition law breaches.”
About this source
GovPing monitors Inner Temple Library Current Awareness for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 185 changes logged to date.
What changed
The Law Commission announced a new project to examine whether England and Wales should introduce a broader consumer class actions regime extending beyond competition law. The project, expected to commence in Autumn 2026, will assess benefits and risks of opt-out collective proceedings for consumer law breaches, building on the existing Competition Appeal Tribunal opt-out model but addressing its current limitation to competition cases only. Businesses should prepare for potential increased exposure to mass consumer claims by engaging with the Law Commission's scoping questionnaire by 30 October 2026 and contributing to consultations on structural design, sector targeting, and litigation culture risks. The project will also consider third-party litigation funding reforms and how any new regime interacts with existing Competition and Markets Authority enforcement powers under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, which already allows direct consumer compensation orders.
Archived snapshot
Apr 23, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Out-Law / Your Daily Need-To-Know
OUT-LAW NEWS 4 min. read
New law reform project could trigger opt-out consumer class actions in the UK
The Law Commission is expected to take a balanced, holistic approach to introducing a new consumer class actions regime. Photo: Joe Dunckley/iStock
21 Apr 2026, 3:27 pm
Follow Class actions and collective redress
A new project will explore extending the opt-out regime in England and Wales beyond competition law, but experts warn that any more general consumer class actions regime must take a proportionate approach to risk.
The Law Commission of England and Wales has announced a significant new project examining whether England and Wales should introduce a new consumer class actions regime.
The project, announced on 20 April, follows the government requesting the Law Commission to assess whether the way consumer laws are enforced in England and Wales could be strengthened through the introduction of a consumer class actions regime.
The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) regime allows true ‘opt-out’ claims – in other words where a representative claimant pursues a claim on behalf of a class of others who do not need to take any positive steps to join the claim – but this procedural regime is only currently available in cases involving competition law breaches.
For other types of claims, currently the representative action procedure in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) r.19.8 allows a single claimant to bring proceedings as representative of others who have the “same interest” in the claim, without those others being party to the proceedings. However, this “same interest” requirement has made it difficult for some claimants to bring a representative action in practice.
The Law Commission’s project, which is expected to commence in Autumn 2026, will identify the benefits and risks associated with introducing a more general consumer class actions regime. It will also make recommendations on how such a regime could be designed both to improve consumers’ access to redress and recovery of potential damages, while promoting “the efficient conduct of litigation at proportionate cost”.
Due to the automatic inclusion of large numbers of class members, opt-out claims can lead to significantly higher aggregate damages and costs for defendant businesses. Ahead of the project’s implementation, the Law Commission has published terms of reference and is inviting businesses to respond to an initial scoping questionnaire.
Commenting on the new project, Emily Cox, a class action litigation specialist at Pinsent Masons, said: “This is the clearest sign yet that the government is at least philosophically drawn to expand the opt-out regime beyond competition law. Given some of the significant cost-benefit questions posed by the CAT regime, this project is a real opportunity for businesses to make a considered case regarding structural and design issues, and how consumers and businesses might best be served, for example with alternative dispute resolution.”
Previous proposals to introduce a more general consumer class actions regime similar to the CAT regime have not progressed in England and Wales, although Scotland is currently considering introducing a general opt-out group proceedings regime.
Last year the Department for Business and Trade ran a call for evidence regarding the efficacy of the class actions regime already in place in the CAT – the outcome of which is still awaited.
The Law Commission also says it will consider the funding of claims, taking into account any reforms to third-party litigation funding (TPLF) that might be introduced as a result of the Civil Justice Council’s (CJC’s) recent review of such funding.
TPLF is a critical factor in bringing most class actions but has received criticism that it is inadequately regulated and can drive up the costs of actions without appropriate concomitant benefit to consumers.
The CJC published a final report (150-page / 1MB PDF) following its review of litigation funding last summer. The government has indicated that it will adopt at least some of the CJC’s proposals, meaning that some additional regulation of the TPLF industry may be introduced in the foreseeable future.
Encouragingly for businesses, the terms of reference for this latest project suggest that the Law Commission is expected to take a balanced, holistic approach to introducing a new consumer class actions regime. In particular, the project will consider the relative effectiveness of distribution of damages as well as whether certain sectors are disproportionately targeted by litigants, and the relative vulnerability of opt-out collective proceedings being exploited and creating a ‘litigation culture’.
Angelique Bret, a competition and consumer law expert at Pinsent Masons, said the introduction of a collective actions regime for consumer law breaches has been anticipated since the enhanced civil enforcement regime for consumer law breaches was introduced by the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCCA).
The DMCCA, which came into effect in April 2025, empowered the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), the UK’s consumer and competition law watchdog, to decide whether a company has breached consumer law, without having to go to court, along with the ability to impose fines and make directions for consumers to be compensated.
As Bret noted, the CMA recently used these powers for the first time in relation to ‘drip pricing” breaches of consumer law by two driving schools. The companies involved were fined over £4 million and ordered to compensate affected consumers over £760,000 in refunds.
Bret cautioned that a broad consumer class actions regime should be clearly defined in relation to obligations for business and its scope more generally. She said “Given that there is already a mechanism for consumers to be compensated following a CMA consumer protection investigation, any collective action regime for consumer law breaches would need to take this into account, as consumers should not be compensated twice over. This differs from the competition law enforcement regime, which does not include a mechanism for the CMA to order compensation following the finding of a competition law breach.”
Defining the scope will be particularly important given the gradual broadening of the types of claims being raised in opt-out collective proceedings before CAT in recent years. As illustrated in one recent data-related claim that will proceed to trial next year, claimants bringing standalone opt-out collective proceedings before the CAT are increasingly seeking to characterise data privacy, consumer protection, environmental pollution, or other behaviours as examples of abuse of dominance.
The Law Commission is inviting stakeholder input on the project until 30 October 2026 and plans to publish a formal consultation paper containing its views and any proposals for reform later this year.
Cox added: “This may be an invaluable opportunity for businesses with real-world experience of the impact of mass claims and the way they are run to help inform the direction of travel.”
- Class actions and collective redress
- Antitrust, competition & trade
- Competition litigation
- Energy & Natural Resources
- Financial Services
- Government and public sector
- Professional & Public Services
- Retail & Consumer
- Technology, Science & Industry
- United Kingdom Contact an adviser
Angelique Bret Partner
+44 (0) 7733 307 377 [email protected] View Profile
Emily Cox Partner
+44 (0) 7918 338 155 [email protected] View Profile
Latest News
13 hours ago
Employment horizon scanning
13 hours ago
Sovereign financial cloud launch prompts UAE firms to rethink cloud and data strategies
14 hours ago
Data protection warning as stadiums look to ramp up biometric features
17 hours ago
New contract for difference option and tax uplift for renewable electricity generators
17 hours ago
Biodiversity net gain requirements extended from November 2026
Editor's Pick
OUT-LAW ANALYSIS
Regulatory outlook for collective actions in 2026 and beyond
24 Oct 2025
OUT-LAW ANALYSIS
UK competition law collective proceedings regime evolving a decade on
15 Oct 2025
Know what’s coming, make better decisions
Stay ahead by signing up to our weekly email of news and expert analysis, tailored for you
You might also like
OUT-LAW NEWS
Need for broader protections highlighted as judge makes first SLAPP ruling under ECCTA
An historic ruling against a multi-million pound libel suit highlights the needs for broader speech protection laws in the UK, according to an expert.
16 Mar 2026
Defamation OUT-LAW NEWS
China tax rebate changes signal new reality for solar and battery exports
Upcoming changes to China’s export tax rebate system will materially affect global supply chains, including South Africa’s solar panel market, an expert has said.
27 Mar 2026
Energy & Natural Resources OUT-LAW NEWS
Australia tightens merger rules from April as ACCC thresholds expand
Australia’s new mandatory merger control regime will enter its next major phase this week, on 1 April, introducing additional notification thresholds and voting power rules that expand the number of transactions requiring clearance.
31 Mar 2026
Trending topics across the site:
- Employment
- Arbitration
- Construction Advisory & Disputes
- Construction
- Data, privacy & cyber Left OUT-LAW NEWS
19 January 2023
UK government plans to revamp holiday pay calculation for part-year workers
Show me more OUT-LAW ANALYSIS
23 February 2021
Pensions disputes: managing member expectations paramount
Show me more OUT-LAW ANALYSIS
1 February 2021
UK subsidy control post-Brexit: access to effective judicial remedies
Show me more OUT-LAW NEWS
8 February 2016
'Steps of court' settlement was not negligent, court rules
Show me more OUT-LAW NEWS
27 August 2020
'Vast majority' of companies not seeking to avoid tax
Show me more OUT-LAW NEWS
19 March 2021
'World first' industrial decarbonisation strategy developed in the UK
Show me more OUT-LAW ANALYSIS
21 September 2020
3D printing: UK product safety issues
Show me more OUT-LAW NEWS
18 January 2021
5G potential for business highlighted in UK funding programme
Show me more Right
Related changes
Get daily alerts for Inner Temple Library Current Awareness
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Pinsent Masons.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Inner Temple Library Current Awareness publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.