High Court Judge Formal Warning for Judgment Delays, Cleared of AI Use
Summary
The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office issued a formal warning to Mr Justice Derek Sweeting for judicial misconduct due to delays in handing down judgments in two cases—one 11 months after hearing and another eight months after hearing. The Lord Chancellor and Lady Chief Justice accepted the recommendation. The judge was cleared of using AI in drafting judgments despite serious drafting errors found in one case. This follows a prior formal advice issued in September 2023 for another delayed judgment.
What changed
Mr Justice Derek Sweeting received a formal warning for misconduct from the JCIO following two complaints about delayed judgments. The first involved an 11-month delay (July 2024 hearing, judgment delivered June 2025) with serious drafting errors initially suspected of indicating AI use, though the investigating judge found no evidence of AI. The second involved an eight-month delay (October 2024 hearing) causing substantial practical, procedural, and financial detriment. The nominated judge found the delays constituted misconduct, noting the judge had previously received formal advice in September 2023 for a 14-month delay. The Lord Chancellor and Lady Chief Justice accepted the formal warning recommendation.
Legal professionals and courts should note this reinforces judicial standards for timely judgment delivery. While this is an individual enforcement action, it demonstrates the JCIO's continued focus on case progression delays as misconduct. Parties experiencing significant judgment delays may lodge formal complaints through the JCIO process. The judge's prior formal advice did not prevent escalation to formal warning for subsequent delays, indicating that repeated delays may result in escalating sanctions.
Penalties
Formal warning issued; prior formal advice in September 2023 for similar misconduct
Archived snapshot
Apr 3, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Formal warning for High Court judge over judgment delays
2 April 2026 Posted by Neil Rose
Sweeting: Three complaints in four years
A High Court judge has been issued with a formal warning for misconduct over significant delays in handing down judgments in two cases – but cleared of using AI in drafting one of them.
Mr Justice Derek Sweeting had previously received the lower sanction of formal advice after a delayed judgment in 2023.
He joined the High Court bench at the start of 2022 after his year as chair of the Bar Council.
The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) said it had received two separate complaints from lawyers about delays.
In the first, Sweeting J handed down judgment 11 months after the hearing in July 2024. The same complainant also alleged that a draft judgment circulated in June 2025 contained serious inaccuracies “suggestive of serious irregularity in the drafting process, such as the possible use of artificial intelligence (AI)”.
The second complaint involved judgment handed down eight months after the October 2024 hearing, a delay which it was said caused “substantial practical, procedural and financial detriment”.
The JCIO recorded that Sweeting J acknowledged the delays and cited various reasons for the delays, including workload pressures and personal circumstances during summer 2024.
He accepted that there were serious drafting errors in the first judgment, which he said “arose from mistakes made under pressure and were not indicative of having used AI in relation to the judgment”.
Sweeting J added that he had since caught up with his outstanding judgments.
The nominated (investigating) judge found that the delays amounted to misconduct.
“While the drafting errors referred to in the first complaint were serious and required correction, they did not independently constitute misconduct; rather, they formed part of the overall lack of diligence associated with the delay,” the JCIO said.
“The nominated judge found no evidence that AI had been used in producing the judgment.”
In recommending a sanction of formal warning, the nominated judge noted that Sweeting J had received a sanction of formal advice for a delayed judgment in September 2023 – that one was 14 months after the hearing, for which he cited his “busy sitting schedule and personal matters”.
He had also “not expressed remorse for the delays or the errors in one of the judgments”.
The Lord Chancellor, Shabana Mahmood, and the Lady Chief Justice, Baroness Carr, accepted the recommendation and issued the warning.
Sign up to our free e-newsletter
Leave a Comment
By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.
Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published. Name *
Email *
Comment *
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Blog
2 April 2026
Mazur: a symptom not a cause?
If Mazur is a symptom, what does it mean for the underlying health of our civil justice system: the ‘finest legal system in the world’?
Read More More Blogs 1 April 2026
Cross-generation collaboration: the key to in-house legal tech adoption
In-house legal function leaders will increasingly have to evolve their thinking on how to manage multigenerational teams containing differing levels of technological expertise.
Read More More Blogs 27 March 2026
AI and law firm risk – the view of professional indemnity insurers
In considering law firm applications for cover, many insurers will expect to see evidence of how firms are adapting to AI and preparing for the future.
Upcoming Webinars
- 09/04/2026 ### Providing for pets in wills
- 14/04/2026 ### The court’s case management powers in practice
15/04/2026
Rights of way- key points for conveyancers
Conferences
- ### Housing Condition Conference 2026
Claims Futures Conference 2026
Related News
CPS left without counsel after chambers confusion
Return to normality – Court of Appeal overturns Mazur ruling
Mazur reaction: A victory for all, says CILEX
Lawyers on both sides see trouble ahead for motor finance redress
FCA issues stark warning to law firms over motor finance scheme
Features
Flat roof developments: legal disputes and strategic representation
- ### Mazur – a problem 300 years in the making
- ### When the dust doesn’t settle: Enforcement in housing disrepair claims
Associate News
- ### Nearly one in eight employers does not provide sexual harassment training, as key Employment Rights Act deadline arrives
- ### 7 practical tips for planning your digital legacy
- ### HMRC property transaction reaction: “Ominous tone for the housing market”
- ### From helpdesk to Head of Product: Why the best product leaders start by listening
- ### Why transparency is the new currency in personal injury law
- ### Verisk Claims data bites: Personal injury psychological injury trends
- ### Why client onboarding still frustrates both clients and law firms More Stories ## Associates
#### LPG #### InfoTrack #### Bundledocs #### Qanooni #### iCOFA #### Finders International #### Acquira Professional Services #### Brabners #### National Claims #### Conscious Solutions #### DG Legal #### National Accident Law #### LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions #### Ignite Specialty Risk #### O'Connors #### Litera #### Clio #### ARAG #### Nexa Law #### Fenchurch Legal #### R&R Solutions #### Checkboard #### Landmark Information Group #### Verisk #### Legmark #### BigHand #### AxiaFunder #### Valid8 IP #### Lockton Companies LLP #### Dye & Durham #### Search Acumen #### Osprey Approach #### DR Solicitors #### Linetime #### Recovery First Limited #### Access Legal #### Actionstep #### National Accident Helpline #### OneAdvanced #### Miller Insurance Services LLP #### Document Direct #### Temple Legal Protection #### Stridon #### SearchFlow #### Express Solicitors #### LexisNexis®InterAction® #### OneSearch Direct #### LEAP Legal Software #### VinciWorks #### Sentry Funding #### SOS Legal #### tmGroup #### Legal intelligence from LexisNexis® #### Perfect Portal #### CEL Solicitors #### Allianz Legal Protection #### Internet Erasure Ltd #### Fraser and Fraser #### Auto Claims Assist #### Financial & Legal
Sign-up for our e‑newsletter
Get our news roundup every Friday.
Email * Sign-up here Services Directory Advertise Become an Associate
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for Inner Temple Library Current Awareness
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from JCIO.
The plain-English summary, classification, and "what to do next" steps are AI-generated from the original text. Cite the source document, not the AI analysis.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Inner Temple Library Current Awareness publishes new changes.