JLG 290 v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al - Personal Injury
Summary
JLG 290 filed a civil complaint on April 24, 2026, in the Northern District of California against Rasier LLC, Rasier-CA LLC, and Uber Technologies Inc. for personal injury. The case is filed under diversity jurisdiction and assigned case number 3:26-cv-03553. The complaint seeks damages against the defendants, with the filing fee receipted at $405. No case summary is publicly available at this time, and no substantive rulings or motions have been issued by the court.
“COMPLAINT against Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-21910628.). Filed by JLG 290.”
About this source
The Northern District of California is the busiest federal trial court for technology disputes. NDCA covers San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose, Eureka, and most of the Bay Area, which means almost every major tech defendant gets sued here first. This feed tracks every new civil case filed at the court, around 300 a month: trade secret disputes, patent infringement, employment class actions, securities suits, copyright, antitrust. GovPing publishes each filing within hours of the docket update, with the parties, case number, judge assignment, and category. Watch this if you litigate in NDCA, brief tech sector legal trends, or compete with Google, Apple, Meta, OpenAI, or any other defendant headquartered in the Bay Area.
What changed
JLG 290 filed a civil personal injury complaint against Uber Technologies Inc. and two related Rasier LLC entities in the Northern District of California. The complaint was filed on April 24, 2026, with a filing fee of $405, and case number 3:26-cv-03553 was assigned. The nature of suit is listed as Personal Injury, with diversity as the case basis.
Parties reviewing this docket should note that this is an early-stage filing — only the complaint, a certificate of interested entities, a notice of new action filing, and a proposed summons have been filed as of April 24, 2026. No answer, motions, or discovery have yet occurred. Defendants Uber Technologies Inc. and the Rasier entities should retain counsel if not already represented in this district.
Archived snapshot
Apr 25, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
JLG 290 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Number: 3:26-cv-03553 Location: San Francisco Case Type: Civil Case Basis: Diversity Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other Date Filed:
April 24, 2026
Last Filing Date:
April 24, 2026
View Publicly Available Documents Case Summary No summary of this case is available
Recent Filings
| Date Filed | Docket Number | Document Description |
|---|---|---|
| 04-24-26 | 1 | COMPLAINT against Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-21910628.). Filed by JLG 290. (Attachments: # (1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Lizik, Dana) |
| 04-24-26 | 2 | Certificate of Interested Entities by JLG 290 (Lizik, Dana) |
| 04-24-26 | 3 | NOTICE by JLG 290 of Filing of New Action (Lizik, Dana) |
| 04-24-26 | 4 | Proposed Summons. (Lizik, Dana) |
Mentioned entities
Related changes
Get daily alerts for NDCA Recently Filed Cases
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from NDCA.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when NDCA Recently Filed Cases publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.