Search

Richardson et al v. Berkeley Unified School District et al - Civil Rights Removal

The Northern District of California posted a civil rights removal action filed by Berkeley Police Department on April 20, 2026. The case was removed from Alameda County Superior Court (case number 26CV174248) to federal court. The filing carries a $405 fee under receipt number ACANDC-21889039.

Bai v. Mullin et al

Yu Bai filed a civil complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against defendants including Mullin et al. The case, docketed as 3:26-cv-03332, was filed on April 20, 2026, and is classified under Nature of Suit as Other Immigration Actions with the U.S. Government as defendant.

N.D. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al - Personal Injury Complaint

A personal injury complaint was filed on April 20, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Uber Technologies Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier CA, LLC. The case (3:26-cv-03305) was filed by plaintiff N.D. under diversity jurisdiction, alleging personal injury and product liability claims. This civil case is proceeding through the federal court system in San Francisco.

SH.S. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al — Personal Injury

SH.S. filed a civil complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Uber Technologies Inc., Rasier CA LLC, and Rasier LLC on April 20, 2026. The complaint alleges personal injury and product liability claims. Case number 3:26-cv-03302 is assigned to the San Francisco division.

GS36 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al - Libel & Slander

GS36 filed a civil diversity complaint in the Northern District of California against Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLC alleging libel, slander, and assault claims. The complaint was filed on April 20, 2026, accompanied by a proposed summons and certificate of interested entities. This is an initial filing with no court orders or substantive rulings to date.

LS 703 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

Jane Doe LS 703 filed a personal injury product liability lawsuit against Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on April 20, 2026. The complaint was filed with a $405 filing fee. Summonses have been issued to all named defendants. This is a diversity jurisdiction civil case filed in San Francisco.

LS 704 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Jane Doe LS 704 filed a personal injury product liability complaint against Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLC in the Northern District of California. The complaint was filed on April 20, 2026, with summons subsequently issued to all three defendants. This marks the formal commencement of federal civil litigation based on diversity jurisdiction.

F. v. Humboldt County et al

A civil rights complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Humboldt County and unidentified co-defendants by plaintiff J. F. on April 20, 2026. The complaint, filed by attorney Brian Claypool, seeks damages for alleged civil rights violations under federal question jurisdiction.

C.P. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

C.P. filed a personal injury product liability complaint in the Northern District of California against Uber Technologies Inc., Rasier CA, LLC, and Rasier, LLC on April 20, 2026. The case, numbered 3:26-cv-03304, is a civil diversity action filed from the San Francisco courthouse. Summons has been issued to all named defendants.

Williams v. North East Medical Services

A civil action was filed in the Northern District of California on April 20, 2026, with Williams as plaintiff and North East Medical Services as defendant. North East Medical Services subsequently filed a Notice of Removal from San Francisco County Superior Court (Case No. CGC-26-634548) and a Rule 7.1 Disclosures filing. No case summary or substantive allegations are publicly available at this time.

Wood v. Trupanion, Inc. - Contract Dispute

Elizabeth Wood filed a civil diversity action against Trupanion, Inc. in the Northern District of California on April 20, 2026. The complaint alleges a contract dispute (Nature of Suit: Contract: Other). No case summary is available and no substantive orders or judgments have issued at this early procedural stage.

Haddad v. Circle K Stores - Employment Civil Rights Dispute

Plaintiff Youssef Haddad filed an employment civil rights action against Circle K Stores, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was removed from Alameda County Superior Court (case number 26CV170750) to federal court by Circle K on April 20, 2026. Circle K filed corporate disclosure identifying Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. as its corporate parent. The nature of suit is classified as Civil Rights: Jobs.

Rajanikanth et al v. Edlow et al

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California docketed Rajanikanth et al v. Edlow et al (Case No. 5:26-cv-00660-EKL), a civil case concerning other immigration actions filed by private plaintiffs against Joseph B. Edlow and USCIS. Judge Eumi K. Lee is assigned to the San Jose Division. The most recent filing dated April 21, 2026 is a reply brief in support of a motion to dismiss filed by the defendants.

In re: San Francisco Care Center, L.P. — Bankruptcy Appeal

San Francisco Care Center, L.P. filed a bankruptcy appeal in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Case No. 3:26-cv-03262-WHO) on April 20, 2026. The appeal is assigned to Judge William H. Orrick and stems from Bankruptcy Court case number 25-30025-DM. A Notice of Appeal and Scheduling Order were entered on April 17, 2026.

Roe CL 307 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

Plaintiff Jane Roe CL 307 filed a personal injury product liability complaint against Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint was filed on April 20, 2026, with a filing fee of $405. No case summary or publicly available documents are currently accessible for this newly filed matter.

LS 705 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

Jane Doe LS 705 filed a civil complaint against Uber Technologies, Inc. and all other defendants in the Northern District of California on April 20, 2026. The case, designated as a personal injury product liability matter, is based on diversity jurisdiction. Filed documents include the complaint (with a $405 filing fee), proposed summons, and certificate of interested entities.

Brown v. Salcido - Ninth Circuit Denies Intervention Motion

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of a motion to intervene filed by 185 Google Chrome users (the Salcido plaintiffs) seeking to appeal the denial of class certification for damages in a lawsuit alleging Google improperly collected Incognito mode user data. The court applied a three-factor timeliness test for intervention motions and held that all factors weighed against intervention: the stage of proceedings was unfavorable, intervening would prejudice Google and the named plaintiffs by likely unraveling the existing settlement, and the three-month delay lacked justification. The ruling reinforces that intervention motions filed near the end of class settlements face a high bar.

Shirriel v. City of Berkeley et al - ADA Employment Complaint

Hana Shirriel filed a civil complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the City of Berkeley alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act in the employment context. The complaint, filed April 20, 2026, names the City as defendant and was accompanied by the required filing fee and civil cover sheet.

Ferris v. Federal Express Corporation - Employment Civil Rights

A civil employment discrimination case was filed in the Northern District of California on April 20, 2026. Federal Express Corporation removed the case from Placer County Superior Court, citing diversity jurisdiction. The plaintiff Ferris alleges civil rights violations related to employment. The defendant filed a civil cover sheet and certificate of interested entities identifying FedEx Corporation as the corporate parent.

Jane Doe LS 706 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

Jane Doe LS 706 filed a personal injury product liability complaint against Uber Technologies, Inc. and all other defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The civil action, filed April 20, 2026, was assigned case number 3:26-cv-03317 and is based on diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiff is represented by Samira Bokaie of Bokaie Law. Initial filings include the complaint, proposed summons, and certificate of interested entities.

McCullough v. Banerjee - Prison Condition Civil Action

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California docketed a civil rights action filed by prisoner McCullough against Banerjee, arising under federal question jurisdiction and alleging prison condition violations. The court issued a procedural order on April 20, 2026 addressing a CDCR email filing violation. The case remains in early procedural stages with no substantive rulings or compliance directives issued.

Smith v. Jefferson Capital Systems LLC et al - Consumer Credit Dispute

Rodney Tommy Smith filed a consumer credit civil action in the Northern District of California on April 20, 2026, against Jefferson Capital Systems LLC, Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions Inc, Innovis Data Solutions Inc, National Consumer Telecommunications and Utility Exchange Inc, and Trans Union LLC. The complaint was filed with a $405 filing fee and the court has issued summons to all defendants. An initial case management conference is scheduled for July 23, 2026.

Western National Mutual Insurance Company v. Extreme Design Builders, Inc. - Contract Dispute

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California docketed transcript filings and minute entries for proceedings held on April 9-10, 2026 in Western National Mutual Insurance Company v. Extreme Design Builders, Inc. (Case 3:23-cv-02727-EMC). The filings document a Motion for Summary Judgment hearing before Judge Edward M. Chen. No substantive ruling, judgment, or order is included in this docket summary.

Forrest v. Meta Platforms, Inc. - Trademark Dispute

Andrew Forrest filed a trademark dispute against Meta Platforms, Inc. in the Northern District of California on June 23, 2022 (Case No. 5:22-cv-03699-PCP). The docket was updated through February 9, 2026 with recent filings including transcript orders from April 2026 proceedings before Judge P. Casey Pitts and Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi, administrative motions to seal, and a February 2026 discovery dispute resolved by order on April 14, 2026.

Shirazi et al v. Meta Platforms - Civil Suit

A civil complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Meta Platforms, Inc. and all defendants by plaintiffs Brian Y. Shirazi and Nida Samson. The complaint was filed with the court on March 25, 2026, accompanied by two exhibits and the required filing fee of $405.

Castaneda et al v. Chime Financial, Inc. - Class Action

Plaintiffs Cindy Castaneda and Lauren Goodloe filed a class action complaint against Chime Financial, Inc. in the Northern District of California on April 3, 2026, alleging personal property claims under diversity jurisdiction. Summons has been issued to Chime Financial, Inc. The Initial Case Management Conference is scheduled for July 7, 2026 at 1:30 PM in Oakland, California.

Harrison v. Moseley et al - Prisoner Civil Rights

Prisoner Harrison filed a civil rights action against Moseley et al in the Northern District of California, removing the case from Marin County Superior Court. A motion for screening order under 28 U.S.C. §1915A was filed concurrently, with responses due by May 18, 2026 and replies due by June 1, 2026.