Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Jamar Cedric Thomas v. State - Case Dismissed
Routine Enforcement Removed Final

Jamar Cedric Thomas v. State - Case Dismissed

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com GA Court of Appeals Opinions
Filed March 23rd, 2026
Detected March 23rd, 2026
Email

Summary

The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the direct appeal of Jamar Cedric Thomas v. State due to a lack of jurisdiction. The dismissal was based on Thomas's failure to follow the proper interlocutory appeal procedure after his motion to suppress was denied.

What changed

The Georgia Court of Appeals has dismissed the direct appeal filed by Jamar Cedric Thomas in his case against the State. The dismissal stems from Thomas's failure to adhere to the correct procedural requirements for an interlocutory appeal after the trial court denied his motion to suppress. Specifically, while a certificate of immediate review was obtained, a timely application for interlocutory appeal was not filed with the Court of Appeals, thereby divesting the court of jurisdiction.

This ruling underscores the importance of strict adherence to appellate procedure in Georgia. Legal professionals representing parties in similar situations must ensure that all deadlines and filing requirements for interlocutory appeals are met. Failure to do so, as demonstrated in this case, will result in the dismissal of the appeal, leaving the trial court's decision on the motion to suppress as the operative order.

What to do next

  1. Review appellate procedure for interlocutory appeals in Georgia.
  2. Ensure timely filing of applications for interlocutory appeal when required.

Source document (simplified)

Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 23, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Jamar Cedric Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Disposition

Dismissed

Combined Opinion

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________
March 23, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26A1360. JAMAR CEDRIC THOMAS v. THE STATE.

On January 9, 2026, the trial court entered an order denying Jamar Cedric
Thomas’s motion to suppress, and on January 18, 2026, the trial court issued a
certificate of immediate review. On February 9, 2026, Thomas filed a notice of appeal,
seeking to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress.1 We lack jurisdiction over this
direct appeal.
Under OCGA § 5-6-34(a)(1), direct appeals generally may be taken from “[a]ll
final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court
below[.]” An order denying the motion to suppress is not a final appealable decision
within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-34(a). Accordingly, Thomas was required to
follow the interlocutory appeal procedure outlined in OCGA § 5-6-34(b) by obtaining
a certificate of immediate review from the trial court within ten days and filing a timely
application for interlocutory appeal in this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-34(b); Court of
Appeals Rule 30. Although Thomas did obtain a timely certificate of immediate
review, he did not file a timely application for interlocutory appeal and obtain an order

1
On that same day, the trial court entered a second certificate of immediate
review, nunc pro tunc to February 6, 2026, after Thomas moved the trial court to
“correct” the certificate to reflect the date the defense received actual notice.
Thomas then filed an application for interlocutory appeal on February 13, 2026, which
this Court dismissed as untimely because it was not filed within ten days of January
18, 2026 certificate of immediate review. See Case No. A26I0140 (dismissed March
13, 2026).
from this Court granting him the right to file a direct appeal. Thomas’s failure to do
so deprives this Court of jurisdiction of this appeal, which is accordingly
DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
03/23/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Named provisions

Motion to Suppress Certificate of Immediate Review Interlocutory Appeal

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
GA Courts
Filed
March 23rd, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
A26A1360
Docket
A26A1360

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals
Activity scope
Appellate Procedure
Geographic scope
US-GA US-GA

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Appellate Procedure Criminal Law

Get Courts & Legal alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when GA Court of Appeals Opinions publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.