Calvin Lewis Neal v. State - Interlocutory Appeal Dismissal
Summary
The GA Court of Appeals dismissed Calvin Lewis Neal's interlocutory application (Docket A26I0165) for lack of jurisdiction because the certificate of immediate review was not filed within 10 days as required by OCGA § 5-6-34(b). The court clarified that the trial court must first vacate and re-enter its December 22 order before issuing a new certificate to allow interlocutory review.
What changed
The court dismissed Neal's interlocutory application because the certificate of immediate review was not entered within 10 days of the December 22 order granting reconsideration, as required by OCGA § 5-6-34(b). The court cited Settendown Pub. Utility v. Waterscape Utility precedent establishing that these procedural requirements are jurisdictional. The court clarified that to preserve interlocutory review rights, the trial court must: (1) vacate and re-enter its December 22 order, then (2) issue a new certificate within 10 days of that re-entered order.
Criminal defense counsel should advise trial courts on the proper procedural sequence when seeking interlocutory review and ensure statutory deadlines are strictly tracked. Defendants facing similar procedural issues should note that failure to comply with the 10-day requirement results in loss of interlocutory appeal rights. This case serves as a reminder of the strict jurisdictional consequences of procedural non-compliance in Georgia criminal appeals.
What to do next
- Track 10-day certificate of immediate review filing deadline under OCGA § 5-6-34(b)
- Advise trial courts on proper procedural sequence when seeking interlocutory review
- Review case for proper certificate timing in pending interlocutory applications
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
April 6, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Calvin Lewis Neal v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: A26I0165
Disposition: Interlocutory Application Dismissed
Disposition
Interlocutory Application Dismissed
Combined Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
April 06, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26I0165. CALVIN LEWIS NEAL v. THE STATE.
This application for interlocutory appeal arises out of a criminal case that has
been pending against Calvin Lewis Neal since September 2019. In December 2022,
the trial court entered an order granting Neal’s motion to suppress evidence against
him discovered during an allegedly illegal detention. The State filed a timely motion
for reconsideration, and on December 22, 2025, the trial court entered an order
granting that motion, vacating its prior order, and denying Neal’s motion to suppress.
The trial court entered its first certificate of immediate review on January 8,
2026. Neal then filed an interlocutory application from the December 22 order, but
we dismissed the application because the certificate was not filed within 10 days of the
order. See Case No. A26I0114 (Feb. 3, 2026). We explained that Neal’s remedy was
to petition the superior court to vacate and re-enter the order at issue.
The trial court then vacated and re-entered the certificate of immediate review,
and Neal has filed a second application from the trial court’s December 22 order.
However, we again lack jurisdiction. Under OCGA § 5-6-34(b), a party may seek
interlocutory review only if the trial court enters its certificate within ten days of the
order sought to be appealed. The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34(b) are
jurisdictional. Settendown Pub. Utility v. Waterscape Utility, 324 Ga. App. 652, 653 (751
SE2d 463) (2013). Consequently, because the second certificate of immediate review
was not entered within ten days of the December 22 order, we are without jurisdiction
to consider this application.
To clarify, if the trial court wants to allow for interlocutory review, it should:
(1) vacate and re-enter its December 22 order granting the State’s motion for
reconsideration and denying Neal’s motion to suppress; and (2) issue a new certificate
of immediate review within 10 days of the new order.
For these reasons, we lack jurisdiction to consider this application, which is
hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
04/06/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Named provisions
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when GA Court of Appeals Opinions publishes new changes.