Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal FTC v. JustAnswer LLC - Consumer Protection Enf...
Urgent Enforcement Added Final

FTC v. JustAnswer LLC - Consumer Protection Enforcement

Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov NDCA Recently Filed Documents
Filed January 13th, 2026
Detected April 3rd, 2026
Email

Summary

The Federal Trade Commission filed a civil enforcement action against JustAnswer LLC in the Northern District of California (Case 3:26-cv-00333-JD) on January 13, 2026, before Judge James Donato. The case, categorized under Other Statutory Actions, represents an FTC consumer protection enforcement matter. Recent filings include a motion for pro hac vice appearance with a $328 filing fee.

What changed

The FTC initiated enforcement litigation against JustAnswer LLC in the Northern District of California, Case 3:26-cv-00333-JD, alleging consumer protection violations. The case was filed January 13, 2026, with Judge James Donato presiding in San Francisco. Recent procedural activity includes a motion for leave to appear in pro hac vice filed by JustAnswer LLC on April 3, 2026, requiring a $328 filing fee.

Companies operating in consumer-facing online services should review their marketing practices and disclosures for FTC compliance. Legal teams should monitor this case for potential precedential value regarding FTC enforcement theories. Any attorneys seeking to appear in this matter must file pro hac vice motions with associated fees.

What to do next

  1. Monitor this case for developments and potential precedential guidance on FTC consumer protection enforcement
  2. Ensure marketing practices and consumer disclosures comply with FTC Act Section 5 standards
  3. Review any pro hac vice motions for additional parties entering the litigation

Penalties

Civil penalties and injunctive relief available to the FTC under consumer protection statutes

Source document (simplified)

Federal Trade Commission v. JustAnswer LLC et al

Case Number: 3:26-cv-00333-JD Judge: Donato, James Location: San Francisco Case Type: Civil Case Basis: U.S. Government Plaintiff Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions Date Filed:

January 13, 2026

Last Filing Date:

March 6, 2026

View Publicly Available Documents Case Summary No summary of this case is available

Recent Filings

| Date Filed | Docket Number | Document Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 04-03-26 | 46 | MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-21830346.) filed by JustAnswer LLC. (Attachments: # (1) Certificate of Good Standing)(Drian, Joshua) |
| 04-02-26 | 43 | ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Bennett, Samantha) |
| 04-02-26 | 44 | ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Dwight, Kevin) |
| 04-02-26 | 45 | ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Mundel, Benjamin) |
| 03-31-26 | 42 | ORDER RE MOTION TO ATTEND TELEPHONICALLY. (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) |
Return to top

Named provisions

Other Statutory Actions ADR Certification Requirements

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
NDCA
Filed
January 13th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
3:26-cv-00333-JD
Docket
3:26-cv-00333-JD

Who this affects

Applies to
Consumers Public companies
Industry sector
4541 E-Commerce 5112 Software & Technology
Activity scope
Consumer Protection Enforcement Deceptive Practices
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Consumer Protection
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Consumer Finance Data Privacy

Get Courts & Legal alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when NDCA Recently Filed Documents publishes new changes.

Optional. Personalizes your daily digest.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.