Interdata Network Inc v. Wang et al - Civil Fraud
Summary
Interdata Network Inc and Cerebellum Networks Inc filed a civil fraud action against Wang et al in the Northern District of California (Case 3:25-cv-03798-JD) before Judge James Donato. The latest filing on April 27 2026 is an administrative motion for leave to file a sur-reply regarding a declaration in support of an attorney fees motion stemming from an Anti-SLAPP motion. Responses to this motion are due by May 1 2026.
“ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION leave to file sur-reply re [73] Declaration in Support,, filed by Cerebellum Networks, Inc., Interdata Network, Inc.. Responses due by 5/1/2026.”
About this source
This is the document-level companion to the NDCA new-cases feed. Where the cases feed lists each new docket as it opens, this one tracks every newly filed document inside existing cases: motions, complaints, answers, amended pleadings, briefs, orders, sentencing memos. Around 390 documents a month, pulled directly from the court's recently-filed page. Watch this if you follow specific cases day-to-day, draft motion briefs that cite recent NDCA reasoning, or research how a particular judge handles a procedural posture. GovPing publishes each new document with the case name, document type, and date, linked back to the court record. Recent: Oracle's trade secrets complaint against Procore, a copyright suit by True Footage against Automax AI.
What changed
The docket shows routine procedural filings in an active civil fraud case, including an administrative motion seeking leave to file a sur-reply in connection with an attorney fees motion related to a prior Anti-SLAPP dismissal. The motion references declarations and exhibits submitted by counsel for the plaintiff entities.
Affected parties in similar civil fraud litigation should note the active use of Anti-SLAPP procedures in this diversity action, as the motion practice demonstrates how defendants may seek fees following successful dismissal motions, and how plaintiffs may contest those fee requests through sur-reply procedures.
Archived snapshot
Apr 27, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Interdata Network, Inc. et al v. Wang et al
Case Number: 3:25-cv-03798-JD Judge: Donato, James Location: San Francisco Case Type: Civil Case Basis: Diversity Nature of Suit: Other Fraud Date Filed:
May 1, 2025
Last Filing Date:
April 16, 2026
View Publicly Available Documents Case Summary No summary of this case is available
Recent Filings
| Date Filed | Docket Number | Document Description |
|---|---|---|
| 04-27-26 | 78 | ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION leave to file sur-reply re [73] Declaration in Support,, filed by Cerebellum Networks, Inc., Interdata Network, Inc.. Responses due by 5/1/2026. (Attachments: # (1) Declaration of Ievgeniia Vatrenko, # (2) Exh |
| 04-23-26 | 73 | Declaration of David A. Sergenian in Support of [69] MOTION for Attorney Fees as Prevailing Party on Anti-SLAPP Motion [Dkt. No. 8], [66] MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint in Support of Defendant Ken Wang's (1 |
| 04-23-26 | 74 | REPLY (re [66] MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint ) filed byKenzi Wang. (Sergenian, David) |
| 04-23-26 | 75 | REPLY (re [66] MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint ) filed byKenzi Wang. (Sergenian, David) |
| 04-23-26 | 76 | REPLY (re [67] MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (First Amended Complaint) ) filed bySandeep Nailwal. (Attachments: # (1) Declaration of David A. Sergenian ISO Nailwal's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Juris |
| 04-23-26 | 77 | REPLY (re [69] MOTION for Attorney Fees as Prevailing Party on Anti-SLAPP Motion [Dkt. No. 8] ) filed byKenzi Wang. (Sergenian, David) |
Mentioned entities
Related changes
Get daily alerts for NDCA Recently Filed Documents
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from NDCA.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when NDCA Recently Filed Documents publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.