Florida Supreme Court Corrects Opinion in Michael H. Hunt v. State
Summary
The Florida Supreme Court has issued a correction to its opinion in the case of Michael H. Hunt v. State of Florida. The correction involves a minor textual amendment on page 24 of the opinion, clarifying a reference to a previous Supreme Court holding.
What changed
The Florida Supreme Court has issued a Notice of Correction for its opinion in the case of Michael H. Hunt v. State of Florida (Docket No. SC2024-0096). The correction, dated March 5, 2026, amends a specific paragraph on page 24 of the opinion. The original text stated, "In Ramos, the Supreme Court held that the constitutional right to a jury requires a unanimous verdict as to all 'essential elements' of a crime. Id. at 92." This has been corrected to read, "In Ramos, the Supreme Court held that the constitutional right to a jury requires a unanimous verdict. Id. at 92." This change refines the language regarding the scope of the unanimity requirement in jury verdicts as established in the Ramos case.
This correction is primarily of interest to legal professionals involved in the case or those researching jury verdict requirements in Florida. Publishers and legal databases should update their records to reflect the corrected text. There are no new compliance obligations or deadlines imposed on regulated entities by this notice, as it is a procedural correction to a judicial opinion.
What to do next
- Update legal databases and records with the corrected opinion text for Michael H. Hunt v. State of Florida.
Source document (simplified)
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
NOTICE OF CORRECTION DATE: March 5, 2026 CASE OF: MICHAEL H. HUNT V. STATE OF FLORIDA
December 18, 2025 ATTENTION: ALL PUBLISHERS THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION HAS BEEN MADE IN THE ABOVE OPINION: On page 24, lines 8-10 of the paragraph, “In Ramos, the Supreme Court held that the constitutional right to a jury requires a unanimous verdict as to all “essential elements” of a crime. Id. at 92.” was changed to “In Ramos, the Supreme Court held that the constitutional right to a jury requires a unanimous verdict. Id. at 92.” SIGNED: OPINION CLERK
DOCKET NO.: SC2024-0096 OPINION FILED:
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Florida Supreme Court Opinions publishes new changes.