Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Florida Supreme Court Corrects Opinion in Micha...
Routine Notice Amended Final

Florida Supreme Court Corrects Opinion in Michael H. Hunt v. State

Favicon for supremecourt.flcourts.gov Florida Supreme Court Opinions
Published March 5th, 2026
Detected March 28th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Florida Supreme Court has issued a correction to its opinion in the case of Michael H. Hunt v. State of Florida. The correction involves a minor textual amendment on page 24 of the opinion, clarifying a reference to a previous Supreme Court holding.

What changed

The Florida Supreme Court has issued a Notice of Correction for its opinion in the case of Michael H. Hunt v. State of Florida (Docket No. SC2024-0096). The correction, dated March 5, 2026, amends a specific paragraph on page 24 of the opinion. The original text stated, "In Ramos, the Supreme Court held that the constitutional right to a jury requires a unanimous verdict as to all 'essential elements' of a crime. Id. at 92." This has been corrected to read, "In Ramos, the Supreme Court held that the constitutional right to a jury requires a unanimous verdict. Id. at 92." This change refines the language regarding the scope of the unanimity requirement in jury verdicts as established in the Ramos case.

This correction is primarily of interest to legal professionals involved in the case or those researching jury verdict requirements in Florida. Publishers and legal databases should update their records to reflect the corrected text. There are no new compliance obligations or deadlines imposed on regulated entities by this notice, as it is a procedural correction to a judicial opinion.

What to do next

  1. Update legal databases and records with the corrected opinion text for Michael H. Hunt v. State of Florida.

Source document (simplified)

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

NOTICE OF CORRECTION DATE: March 5, 2026 CASE OF: MICHAEL H. HUNT V. STATE OF FLORIDA

December 18, 2025 ATTENTION: ALL PUBLISHERS THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION HAS BEEN MADE IN THE ABOVE OPINION: On page 24, lines 8-10 of the paragraph, “In Ramos, the Supreme Court held that the constitutional right to a jury requires a unanimous verdict as to all “essential elements” of a crime. Id. at 92.” was changed to “In Ramos, the Supreme Court held that the constitutional right to a jury requires a unanimous verdict. Id. at 92.” SIGNED: OPINION CLERK

DOCKET NO.: SC2024-0096 OPINION FILED:

Classification

Agency
FL Courts
Published
March 5th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
SC2024-0096
Docket
SC2024-0096

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals Criminal defendants
Geographic scope
Florida US-FL

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Criminal Justice Constitutional Law

Get Courts & Legal alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Florida Supreme Court Opinions publishes new changes.

Optional. Personalizes your daily digest.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.