Timothy Schlafer v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

FL District Court of Appeal Opinions

Filed March 19th, 2026

Detected March 20th, 2026

Summary

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision denying a rule 3.800 motion filed by Timothy Schlafer. The case involved an appeal of an order related to a criminal matter. No appearance was required for the State of Florida.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

The Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, has affirmed the trial court's decision denying Timothy Schlafer's motion filed under rule 3.800. The specific nature of the original motion and the underlying criminal case are not detailed in this opinion, but the appellate court's disposition indicates that the lower court's ruling was upheld.

This affirmation means that the legal proceedings related to Schlafer's motion will not be reopened or altered by the appellate court. For compliance officers, this signifies the finality of the judicial decision in this specific matter. No immediate actions are required for regulated entities, as this is a specific case outcome rather than a new regulatory requirement.

Source document (simplified)

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 19, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Timothy Schlafer v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Citations: None known
Docket Number: 4D2025-2670
Disposition: Affirmed
Opinion
Authorities (0)
Cited By (0)
Summaries (0)
Similar Cases (0)
PDF

Disposition

Affirmed

Combined Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

TIMOTHY SCHLAFER,
Appellant,

STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.

No. 4D2025-2670

[March 19, 2026]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara Duffy, Judge;
L.T. Case No. 08-009148-CF10A.

Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Devin Johnson, Assistant Public
Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.