Douglas v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal
Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Christopher R. Douglas v. State of Florida. The appeal concerned a 3.850 motion related to a criminal case from Lake County. The court's disposition was an affirmation of the prior ruling.
What changed
The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida has issued a decision in the case of Christopher R. Douglas v. State of Florida, docket number 5D2025-2191. The court affirmed the lower court's disposition concerning a 3.850 motion, which typically relates to post-conviction relief. The original case, L.T. Case No. 35-2009-CF-003430-A, originated from Lake County.
This appellate decision means the lower court's ruling stands. For legal professionals involved in criminal appeals or post-conviction relief in Florida, this case serves as an example of how such appeals are handled and decided at the district court level. No new compliance actions or deadlines are imposed by this ruling, as it pertains to a specific case outcome.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 19, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Christopher R. Douglas v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 5D2025-2191
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2025-2191
L.T. Case No. 35-2009-CF-003430-A
CHRISTOPHER R. DOUGLAS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County.
Cary Frank Rada, Judge.
Christopher R. Douglas, Carrabelle, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen
Randolph Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona
Beach, for Appellee.
March 19, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
EISNAUGLE, KILBANE, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
2
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.