Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al - Civil Personal Injury
Summary
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California docketed multiple filings in Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al (3:19-cv-03310-JSC), including stipulations on deposition designations, Daubert motions, trial subpoenas, and expert testimony matters. Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley approved the parties' joint discovery stipulations and sealed document requests.
What changed
The court docket shows multiple procedural filings in this civil personal injury case. The parties filed stipulations regarding deposition designations and Daubert motions, which Judge Corley granted. Uber and its subsidiaries (Rasier CA, LLC, Rasier, LLC) also filed position statements concerning trial subpoenas for Elizabeth Ross and Andrew Hasbun, along with a motion to file exhibits under seal.
For parties involved in similar civil litigation, this docket illustrates standard pre-trial discovery disputes including expert testimony challenges and sealed document procedures. Compliance teams at transportation and technology companies should note that ride-sharing industry disputes continue to generate complex multi-party litigation with significant discovery obligations.
What to do next
- Monitor docket for trial date setting
- Review sealed filings if granted access
Archived snapshot
Apr 9, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Number: 3:19-cv-03310-JSC Judge: Corley, Jacqueline Scott Location: San Francisco Case Type: Civil Case Basis: Federal Question Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other Date Filed:
June 12, 2019
Last Filing Date:
February 23, 2026
View Publicly Available Documents Case Summary No summary of this case is available
Recent Filings
| Date Filed | Docket Number | Document Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 04-09-26 | 312 | ORDER by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting [305] Stipulation re: Deposition Designations. (ahm, COURT STAFF) |
| 04-07-26 | 305 | STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re: Deposition Designations filed by Rasier CA, LLC, Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Taylor, Damali) |
| 04-07-26 | 306 | Letter Brief re: Ponton Expert Testimony filed byJane Doe. (Attachments: # (1) Declaration Declaration of Sara M. Peters)(Gorberg, Elise) |
| 04-07-26 | 307 | Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Exhibits filed in Connection With Position Statements Re: Trial Subpoenas of Elizabeth Ross and Andrew Hasbun filed by Rasier CA, LLC, Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Decl |
| 04-07-26 | 308 | Statement / Position Statements Re: Trial Subpoenas of Elizabeth Ross and Andrew Hasbun by Rasier CA, LLC, Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Taylor, Damali) |
| 04-07-26 | 309 | Declaration of Damali A. Taylor in Support of [308] Statement filed byRasier CA, LLC, Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhi |
| 04-07-26 | 310 | Declaration of Sara M. Peters in Support of [308] Statement filed byRasier CA, LLC, Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2)(Related document(s)[308]) (Taylor, Damali) |
| 04-07-26 | 311 | CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Rasier CA, LLC, Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. re [307] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Exhibits filed in Connection With Position Statements Re: Trial Subpoenas of Elizabeth Ross and Andrew Hasbun |
| 04-02-26 | 302 | STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re: Daubert Motions and Deposition Designations filed by Rasier CA, LLC, Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Taylor, Damali) |
| 04-02-26 | 303 | ORDER by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley regarding [302] Stipulation Re: Daubert Motions and Deposition Designations. (ahm, COURT STAFF) |
Return to top
Related changes
Get daily alerts for NDCA Recently Filed Documents
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from NDCA.
The plain-English summary, classification, and "what to do next" steps are AI-generated from the original text. Cite the source document, not the AI analysis.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when NDCA Recently Filed Documents publishes new changes.