Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local ...
Priority review Enforcement Added Draft

Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local 91 Health & Welfare Plan v. Integrated Environments Testing & Balancing, LLC - Default Judgment Audit Order

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com US District Court CDIL Docket Feed
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois granted in part and denied in part a motion for default judgment filed by The Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local 91 Health & Welfare Plan against Integrated Environments Testing & Balancing, LLC, an employer that failed to file contribution reports or pay contributions for May through December 2024 and January through April 2025 under a collective bargaining agreement. The court ordered the defendant to submit to an audit of its payroll records within ten days and to submit all delinquent monthly contribution reports, while reserving ruling on the payment of delinquent contributions, interest, liquidated damages, costs, and attorney's fees pending the audit results. The plaintiff's request for an audit and accounting was granted, but the request for immediate payment of delinquent contributions was denied without prejudice to renew after the audit is complete.

Why this matters

Multiemployer benefit plan trustees enforcing CBA contribution obligations against delinquent employers have a viable path to court-ordered audits upon employer default. Plan documents should include explicit audit rights language authorizing trustees to examine payroll records and set reasonable timeframes for employer compliance with audit requests — the court here relied on CBA Article 10's audit provision as the basis for its order. Employers contributing to multiemployer plans should treat CBA payment deadlines as legally enforceable obligations under ERISA Section 1145, not merely contractual defaults.

AI-drafted from the source document, validated against GovPing's analyst note standards . For the primary regulatory language, read the source document .
Published by USDC CDIL on courtlistener.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors US District Court CDIL Docket Feed for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 14 changes logged to date.

What changed

The court granted in part Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, ordering Defendant Integrated Environments Testing & Balancing, LLC to submit to a payroll audit to determine the amount of contributions owed to the Sheet Metal Workers Local 91 Health & Welfare Plan under the collective bargaining agreement, and to submit all delinquent monthly contribution reports. The court denied without prejudice Plaintiff's request for an award of delinquent contributions, interest, liquidated damages, costs, and attorney's fees, pending completion of the audit. The court entered Defendant's default on September 24, 2025 after Defendant failed to timely respond to the complaint filed under Sections 1132 and 1145 of ERISA. The collective bargaining agreement required Defendant to make payments to the Plan and submit monthly contribution reports by the fifteenth of the following month, with a provision for 2% monthly interest on any willful underpayment.

Multiemployer benefit plan sponsors and trustees should be aware that federal courts will grant audit orders against delinquent contributing employers upon default, providing an enforcement mechanism to quantify underpayment before seeking monetary damages. Employers bound by collective bargaining agreements to multiemployer plans face personal liability for contributions under ERISA Section 1145, and failure to cooperate with audit requirements as specified in the CBA can result in court-ordered compliance. Plan trustees pursuing delinquent employers should ensure CBA audit provisions are clearly stated, as the court relied on CBA Article 10 in granting the audit order.

What to do next

  1. Make financial records available to auditors within ten days of an audit order and otherwise cooperate with the audit
  2. Submit all delinquent monthly contribution reports to Plaintiff covering the period for which the Collective Bargaining Agreement is effective

Archived snapshot

Apr 26, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Jump To

Top Caption Trial Court Document

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 24, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

The Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local 91 Health & Welfare Plan v. Integrated Environments Testing & Balancing, LLC

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Trial Court Document

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
ROCK ISLAND DIVISION

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHEET )
METAL WORKERS LOCAL 91 HEALTH )
& WELFARE PLAN, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. 4:25-cv-04100-SLD-RLH
)
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTS )
TESTING & BALANCING, LLC, )
)
Defendant. )

ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff The Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local 91
Health & Welfare Plan’s motion for default judgment, ECF No. 6, asking the Court to order
Defendant Integrated Environments Testing & Balancing, LLC to submit to an audit to
determine the amount of contributions required to be paid to a fringe benefits fund under the
terms of a collective bargaining agreement. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED
IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
BACKGROUND1
On July 26, 2021, Defendant agreed to be bound by a collective bargaining agreement
(“CBA”) governing pay and benefits for members of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 91 Union
(“the Union”). Compl. 2; see Signature Page, Compl. Ex. B, ECF No. 1 at 42. The CBA was
effective from June 1, 2021, through May 31, 2024. CBA 1,2 Compl. Ex. A, ECF No. 1 at 6–42.

1 Unless otherwise noted, the facts related herein are taken from the Complaint, ECF No. 1. Exhibits attached to the
complaint are properly considered part of the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(c) (“A copy of a written instrument
that is an exhibit to a pleading is a part of the pleading for all purposes.”). The Court accepts the allegations relating
to liability as true by virtue of Defendant’s default. See Wehrs v. Wells, 688 F.3d 886, 892 (7th Cir. 2012).
2 The first two pages of the CBA are unpaginated, but the page numbers used in this order are consistent with the
page numbers beginning on the third page of the CBA.
The Union executed a materially identical collective bargaining agreement covering the period of
June 1, 2024 to May 31, 2027. Extended CBA 1,3 Supp. Br. Ex. A, ECF No. 7-1. The CBA
compelled Defendant to make payments to a health and welfare plan (“the Plan”) and submit
monthly reports of such contributions. “Failure of the Employer to remit promptly the payroll

report or contribution payments on or before the fifteenth day of the following month shall be a
violation of [the CBA].” CBA 8; Extended CBA 8. Defendant “failed to file contribution
reports or pay contributions for the months of May through December of 2024, and January
through April 2025.” Compl. 3.
Plaintiff serves as the trustee of the Plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1101–1461. The CBA empowered Plaintiff “to order an
audit of [Defendant’s] payroll records” to ensure proper payment of wages and benefits. CBA
10; Extended CBA 9. When an audit is ordered, the CBA requires Defendant to make its
financial records available to auditors within ten days and otherwise cooperate with the audit.
“In the event the audit discloses a willful underpayment of wage and/or benefits, [Defendant]

agrees to promptly pay such amounts as reasonably necessary to bring current the obligations
plus pay 2% interest per month on any outstanding balance.” CBA 10; Extended CBA 9.
On May 16, 2025, Plaintiff filed suit under §§ 1132 and 1145 of ERISA. Plaintiff seeks
an order requiring Defendant to submit to an audit and accounting “as to all employees of
[Defendant] covered by the CBA as to wages received and hours worked by such employees to
determine amounts required to be paid to the Plan.” Compl. 4. Plaintiff further asks the Court to
order Defendant to submit all delinquent monthly contribution reports, pay delinquent pension
fund contributions, and pay attorney’s fees pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (g). Id. at 4–5.

3 The first two pages of the Extended CBA are unpaginated, but the page numbers used in this order are consistent
with the page numbers beginning on the third page of the Extended CBA.
Attached to the complaint were a copy of the CBA and a signature page showing Defendant’s
agreement to be bound by the terms of the CBA. See generally CBA; Signature Page. After
Defendant failed to timely file a responsive pleading, the Court entered Defendant’s default on
September 24, 2025. See Sept. 24, 2025 Entry of Default.

On December 2, 2025, Plaintiff filed the motion for default judgment now before the
Court. Plaintiff asks the Court to require Defendant to submit to an audit, to order an account to
be taken of all employees as to wages received and hours earned, and to order Defendant to
submit all delinquent monthly contribution reports to Plaintiff “covering the period for which the
Collective Bargaining Agreement is to be effective.” Mot. Default J. 2. It also asks the Court to
order Defendant to pay delinquent contributions, interest, liquidated damages, costs, and
attorney’s fees. Id. at 3. Upon request of the Court, Plaintiff filed a supplemental brief on March
17, 2026, and attached the Extended CBA. See generally Supp. Br., ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has not
provided a signature page showing Defendant’s agreement to be bound by the terms of the
Extended CBA.

DISCUSSION
I. Default Judgment
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 outlines a two-step process for the entry of default
and default judgment. First, the Court must enter a defendant’s default if it fails to plead or
otherwise defend against the suit. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). After default has been entered, the
plaintiff may move for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55(b). To be entitled to default
judgment, a plaintiff “must establish his entitlement to the relief he seeks.” In re Catt, 368 F.3d
789, 793
(7th Cir. 2004). In determining whether the plaintiff has met this burden, the Court
accepts all well-pleaded allegations of the complaint relating to liability, but not those relating to
damages. Dundee Cement Co. v. Howard Pipe & Concrete Prods., Inc., 722 F.2d 1319, 1323 (7th Cir. 1983). The amount of any damages may be established at a damages hearing or
through documentary evidence or affidavits that establish a definite figure. Id. The well-pleaded facts in Plaintiff’s complaint show that Defendant is liable for violating

ERISA by failing to make required payments to the Plan. See 29 U.S.C. § 1145 (“Every
employer who is obligated to make contributions to a multiemployer plan under the terms of the
plan or under the terms of a collectively bargained agreement shall . . . make such contributions
in accordance with the terms and conditions of such plan or such agreement.”). From May 2024
to April 2025, Defendant failed to make contributions to the Plan or file contribution reports.
Compl. 3. However, no materials in Plaintiff’s filings show that Defendant’s obligation to make
contributions or file contribution reports extended beyond May 2024. The CBA to which
Defendant agreed to be bound expired on May 31, 2024. See CBA 1; Signature Page. Although
the Union executed a materially identical agreement effective through May 31, 2027, see
generally Extended CBA, Plaintiff has not provided an accompanying signature page showing

that Defendant is a party to the Extended CBA, nor has Plaintiff pointed to a provision of the
CBA indicating Defendant’s intent to be bound by future extensions of the CBA.
Therefore, under ERISA and the CBA, an audit is appropriate to determine the extent of
damages incurred as a result of Defendant’s failure to contribute and report only for the month of
May 2024. See CBA 9–10; 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (g). If Plaintiff desires an audit for any months
after May 2024, it has leave to file an amended complaint that establishes its entitlement to an
audit covering those months by May 8, 2026.
As damages cannot be established until the completion of the audit, default judgment
may not yet be entered. See In re Catt, 368 F.3d at 793 (holding that a district court must
“conduct an inquiry in order to ascertain the amount of damages with reasonable certainty”
before entering judgment (quotation marks omitted)); see also e360 Insight v. The Spamhaus
Project, 500 F.3d 594, 602 (7th Cir. 2007) (“[J]udgment by default may not be entered without a
hearing on damages unless the amount claimed is liquidated or capable of ascertainment from

definite figures contained in the documentary evidence or in detailed affidavits.” (quotation
marks omitted)).
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, Plaintiff The Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local 91 Health &
Welfare Plan’s motion for default judgment, ECF No. 6, is GRANTED IN PART. The Court
finds that Defendant Integrated Environments Testing & Balancing, LLC is liable for violating
ERISA and therefore ORDERS Defendant to submit to an audit. Because the amount of
damages cannot be determined until the audit is performed, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s request
for the entry of default judgment. The Court also DENIES Plaintiff’s request for an audit for
months after May 2024. If Plaintiff desires an audit for any subsequent months, it may file an

amended complaint by May 8, 2026.
By May 26, 2026, Defendant must submit to an audit by Plaintiff and provide every
company record that is necessary to determine the amount of contributions owed by Defendant
from May 1, 2024 to May 31, 2024.
By June 26, 2026, Plaintiff may file a renewed motion for default judgment with the
results of the audit regarding the amounts of any unpaid contributions, interest, and liquidated
damages, together with any claims for reasonable attorney’s fees and all supporting
documentation.
Entered this 24th day of April, 2026.
s/ Sara Darrow
SARA DARROW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Named provisions

Audit of Payroll Records Delinquent Contribution Reports

Citations

29 U.S.C. § 1132 ERISA civil enforcement provision under which plaintiff filed suit
29 U.S.C. § 1145 ERISA provision creating employer obligation to pay multiemployer plan contributions

Get daily alerts for US District Court CDIL Docket Feed

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from USDC CDIL.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
USDC CDIL
Filed
April 24th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Branch
Judicial
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Draft
Change scope
Substantive

Who this affects

Applies to
Employers Healthcare providers
Industry sector
2361 Construction
Activity scope
Employee benefit plan enforcement Audit order compliance Payroll contribution reporting
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Employment & Labor
Operational domain
Legal
Compliance frameworks
ERISA
Topics
Employee Benefits Healthcare

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when US District Court CDIL Docket Feed publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!