Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Mattson Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Order Denying Moti...
Routine Enforcement Added Final

Mattson Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Order Denying Motion to Quash Subpoenas

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com US Bankruptcy Court DME Docket Feed
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maine denied debtor Kevin J. Mattson's consolidated motion to quash subpoenas issued by Montresor, LLC to three financial institutions—Gardiner Federal Credit Union, Kennebec Savings, and Winthrop Federal Credit Union. The court held that Mr. Mattson lacked standing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(3)(A)(iv) because non-recipients of subpoenas cannot challenge them on grounds of undue burden. The motion was denied on April 16, 2026.

“As Mr. Mattson is not the recipient of the subpoenas, he has no standing to move for quashal and, therefore, the motions is DENIED.”

Published by US Bankruptcy Court D. Me. on courtlistener.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors US Bankruptcy Court DME Docket Feed for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 3 changes logged to date.

What changed

The court denied the debtor's motion to quash subpoenas issued by Montresor, LLC to three credit unions and a savings bank, citing a long-standing rule that non-recipients lack standing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(3)(A)(iv) to challenge subpoenas on undue burden grounds. The ruling follows established precedent from multiple district courts. Affected parties in bankruptcy contested matters should be aware that only subpoena recipients themselves may move to quash on grounds of undue burden or relevance—not third parties such as debtors or targets of the underlying litigation.

Archived snapshot

Apr 24, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Jump To

Top Caption Trial Court Document

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 16, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

In re: Kevin J. Mattson

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine

Trial Court Document

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE

In re:
Chapter 7
KEVIN J. MATTSON, Case No. 24-20188

Debtor.

ORDER DENYING DEBTOR’S CONSOLIDATED
MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS

Kevin J. Mattson, the debtor in the above-captioned case, seeks an order quashing, or in
the alternative, modifying subpoenas Montresor, LLC issued to Gardiner Federal Credit Union,
Kennebec Savings, and Winthrop Federal Credit Union on or about April 2, 2026 in connection
with a pending contested matter. Mr. Mattson contends that the requests for information
contained in the subpoenas are unduly burdensome because they are duplicative of requests
Montresor, LLC made in connection with an earlier proceeding. Though Mr. Mattson does not
reference the rule, the Court presumes he is moving under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(3)(A)(iv), as
made applicable to this proceeding by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7045.
Courts have long held that non-recipients lack standing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(3) to
challenge a subpoena on the basis of undue burden. See, Silverstone Holding Grp., LLC v.
Zhongtie Dacheng (Zhuhai) Inv. Mgmt. Co., Ltd., 605 F.Supp.3d 199, 202-03 (S.D.N.Y. 2023)
(“[b]ecause Silverstone is not the recipient of the subpoena, it does not have standing to
challenge the subpoena on the independent grounds of undue burden or relevance.”). See also,
Renaissance Custom Homes, LLC v. Elite Homes, LLC, 2024 WL 6078711, at *1 (D. Ore. Oct.
9, 2024); (Wyatt B. v. Kotek, 2024 WL 1905563, at *2 (D. Ore. May 1, 2024); Torres v. Equifax
Info. Services, 2023 WL 12073732, at *1 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2023); Gabriel v. Albany Coll. of
Pharmacy and Health Sciences – Vermont Campus, 2014 WL 3378629, at *3 (D.Vt. July 10,
2014).
As Mr. Mattson is not the recipient of the subpoenas, he has no standing to move for
quashal and, therefore, the motions is DENIED.

Dated: April 16, 2026 /s/ Peter G. Cary
Judge Peter G. Cary
United States Bankruptcy Court

CFR references

Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(3)(A)(iv) Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7045

Get daily alerts for US Bankruptcy Court DME Docket Feed

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from US Bankruptcy Court D. Me..

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
US Bankruptcy Court D. Me.
Filed
April 16th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Branch
Judicial
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Docket
24-20188

Who this affects

Applies to
Criminal defendants Financial advisers Legal professionals
Industry sector
5221 Commercial Banking
Activity scope
Bankruptcy proceedings Subpoena challenges Civil procedure
Geographic scope
US-ME US-ME

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Banking Financial Services

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when US Bankruptcy Court DME Docket Feed publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!