Brittany Jackson v. Bay Street Homes, LLC
Summary
The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed Brittany Jackson's appeal in A26A1284 because her notice of appeal was filed 21 days after the trial court denied her new trial motion, exceeding the mandatory 7-day deadline for dispossessory actions under OCGA § 44-7-56(b)(1). The underlying case involved a landlord-tenant dispute where Jackson prevailed at trial on counterclaims and was awarded $10,802.50 against Bay Street Homes, LLC.
What changed
The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed Brittany Jackson's appeal in A26A1284, finding it lacked jurisdiction because Jackson filed her notice of appeal 21 days after the trial court denied her new trial motion on November 10, 2025, when Georgia law requires appeals in dispossessory actions to be filed within seven days of judgment entry under OCGA § 44-7-56(b)(1). The underlying case involved a landlord-tenant dispute in which Jackson prevailed on counterclaims for failure to repair and damage to personal property, receiving a $10,802.50 judgment against Bay Street Homes.
Landlords, tenants, and legal practitioners handling Georgia landlord-tenant disputes must treat the 7-day appellate deadline as jurisdictional and non-waivable. Missing this deadline, regardless of the strength of the underlying claims or the triviality of the delay, results in automatic dismissal without consideration of the merits. This ruling reinforces that courts cannot overlook procedural defects even where a party may have valid substantive grievances.
What to do next
- Monitor for similar jurisdictional dismissals in Georgia landlord-tenant appeals
- Ensure compliance with 7-day notice of appeal deadline in Georgia dispossessory actions
Archived snapshot
Apr 13, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
April 13, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Brittany Jackson v. Bay Street Homes, LLC
Court of Appeals of Georgia
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: A26A1284
Disposition: Dismissed
Disposition
Dismissed
Combined Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
April 13, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A1284. BRITTANY JACKSON v. BAY STREET HOMES, LLC.
Bay Street Homes, LLC (“Bay Street”) brought this dispossessory action
against Brittany Jackson in the Magistrate Court of Clayton County seeking a writ of
possession for premises leased to Jackson and payment of past due rent, future rent
accruing through final judgment or vacancy, and attorney fees and costs. Jackson
counterclaimed for failure to repair and damage to her personal property. Based on
the amount of damages sought by Jackson in her counterclaim, the magistrate court
determined that it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate that claim and transferred the case
to the State Court of Clayton County. At the commencement of the ensuing bench
trial in state court, Bay Street acknowledged that Jackson had recently vacated the
premises, such that the issue of possession was moot, but noted that it continued to
seek past due rent. The case was then tried on Bay Street’s claim for back rent and
on Jackson’s counterclaims, and the trial court found in favor of Jackson and entered
judgment against Bay Street for $10,802.50. Jackson moved for a new trial, arguing
that the trial court had erred in excluding certain evidence and that the damages
awarded were grossly inadequate. On November 10, 2025, the trial court entered an
order denying the new trial motion, and Jackson filed her notice of appeal on
December 1, 2025. We lack jurisdiction.
While a notice of appeal generally may be filed within 30 days of entry of the
order sought to be appealed, appeals in dispossessory actions must be filed within
seven days of the date the judgment was entered. See OCGA § 44-7-56 (b)(1); Radio
Sandy Springs v. Allen Road Joint Venture, 311 Ga. App. 334, 335–36 (715 SE2d 752)
(2011). Here, although the issue of possession had been resolved by the time the case
was tried, “it is the underlying subject matter of the litigation, rather than the relief
granted, which controls in determining the proper appellate procedure to follow.”
Radio Sandy Springs, 311 Ga. App. at 335. Because “this action . . . began as and
remain[ed] a dispossessory action,” the seven-day time limit for filing a notice of
appeal applied. Stubbs v. Local Homes, LLC, 375 Ga. App. 513, 516 (915 SE2d 91)
(2025). See also Loganville Pediatrics & Adolescent Care Assocs. Corp. v. VMM, LLC,
__ Ga. App. __ (925 SE2d 204) (2026) (the seven-day time limit of OCGA § 44-7-56
applied where, among other things, “the issue of past due rent, which was sought as
part of the initial dispossessory proceeding, remain[ed] in dispute”); Radio Sandy
Springs, 311 Ga. App. at 334–36 (where the action began and continued as a
dispossessory action in which the landlord sought past due rent, the seven-day time
limit of OCGA § 44-7-56 applied, even though the issue of possession was resolved
before the trial court entered its order and no writ of possession was issued); Ray M.
Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521, 523 (521 SE2d 456) (1999) (the seven-day time
limit of OCGA § 44-7-56 applied where the action began as and remained a
dispossessory proceeding, as evidenced by the parties’ continued reliance on the
provisions of the dispossessory statutes, including those pertaining to the payment of
back rent). Compare America Net, Inc. v. U. S. Cover, Inc., 243 Ga. App. 204,
204–07(1) (532 SE2d 756) (2000), overruled in part on other grounds by Smith v. Bell,
346 Ga. App. 152, 156 (816 SE2d 698) (2018) (holding that the seven-day time limit
did not apply where, after the landlord filed its dispossessory action in magistrate
court, the tenant surrendered possession and the parties stipulated that the case
should be transferred to state court for resolution of the remaining contractual claims).
“The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement
to confer jurisdiction upon the appellate court.” Yanes v. Escobar, 362 Ga. App. 896,
898 (870 SE2d 506) (2022) (quotation marks omitted). Jackson’s failure to file her
notice of appeal until 21 days after entry of the order denying her motion for a new
trial deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
04/13/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for GA Court of Appeals Opinions
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from GA Court of Appeals.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when GA Court of Appeals Opinions publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.