Boose v. Musk - Notice of Appeal
Summary
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a Notice of Appeal in the case of Boose v. Musk. The notice was filed by plaintiff Elliot Casray Boose on March 28, 2026, and concerns a prior order denying a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the action.
What changed
A Notice of Appeal has been filed in the case of Boose v. Musk (Case Number 3:25-cv-03366-AMO) by plaintiff Elliot Casray Boose. This filing indicates the plaintiff's intent to appeal a recent court order dated March 24, 2026, which denied a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis, denied a motion for service by publication, and dismissed the action after screening an amended complaint. The appeal is directed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
This filing signifies the initiation of the appellate process for this civil case. Legal professionals involved in the case should note the appeal and prepare for proceedings in the 9th Circuit. The notice itself does not impose new compliance obligations on regulated entities, but it marks a procedural step in ongoing litigation. The fee for the appeal has not yet been paid, which may have implications for the continuation of the appeal.
Source document (simplified)
Boose v. Musk et al
Case Number: 3:25-cv-03366-AMO Judge: Martínez-Olguín, Araceli Location: San Francisco Case Type: Civil Case Basis: Diversity Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Date Filed:
April 22, 2025
Last Filing Date:
March 24, 2026
View Publicly Available Documents Case Summary No summary of this case is available
Recent Filings
| Date Filed | Docket Number | Document Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 03-28-26 | 74 | NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Elliot Casray Boose. (Appeal fee FEE NOT PAID.) (Attachments: # (1) Declaration JUDGEMENT, # (2) Declaration JUDGEMENT, # (3) Certificate/Proof of Service CERTIFICATE PROOF OF |
| 03-24-26 | 72 | ORDER DENYING as moot [69] renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis; DENYING [71] motion for service by publication; GRANTING [70] motion for leave to amend; and DISMISSING action after screening amended complaint. Signed by Judge Araceli Mart |
| 03-24-26 | 73 | JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on March 24, 2026. (amolc3, COURT STAFF) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the No |
Return to top
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when NDCA Recently Filed Documents publishes new changes.