Attorney William Sims Reinstatement with Monitoring Requirements
Summary
The Supreme Court of South Carolina reinstated attorney William John Sims to the practice of law on April 1, 2026, conditioned upon compliance with a three-year monitoring agreement with Lawyers Helping Lawyers. The monitoring includes random drug and alcohol testing and quarterly compliance reports to the Commission on Lawyer Conduct.
What changed
The South Carolina Supreme Court granted attorney William John Sims' petition for reinstatement, concluding his disciplinary proceedings that began with an interim suspension on November 21, 2022, followed by a nine-month definite suspension. The Committee on Character and Fitness conducted a hearing and recommended reinstatement subject to conditions. The Court found Sims met the requirements of Rule 33(f), RLDE, and imposed a three-year monitoring agreement as a condition of reinstatement.
Legal professionals and bar members in South Carolina should note that this order demonstrates the Court's balanced approach to attorney discipline—allowing reinstatement following demonstrated rehabilitation while imposing ongoing supervision requirements. Similar disciplinary matters involving substance abuse may face comparable monitoring conditions. No immediate action is required by other practitioners unless they have pending disciplinary proceedings.
Archived snapshot
Apr 2, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
The Supreme Court of South Carolina
In the Matter of William John Sims, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2025-001065 ORDER Petitioner was placed on interim suspension on November 21, 2022. In re Sims, 438 S.C. 60, 882 S.E.2d 168 (2022). Subsequently, this Court accepted an agreement for discipline between Petitioner and the Office of Disciplinary and imposed a nine-month definite suspension, retroactive to the date of Petitioner's interim suspension. In re Sims, 445 S.C. 633, 916 S.E.2d 316 (2025). On May 16, 2025, Petitioner filed a petition for reinstatement, which was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness. Following a hearing, the Committee issued a report recommending Petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law on the condition that he enter into and comply with a three-year monitoring contract with Lawyers Helping Lawyers. Upon review of the entire record before the Court, we find Petitioner has demonstrated he meets the requirements of Rule 33(f), RLDE. Therefore, we grant the petition and reinstate Petitioner as a regular member of the South Carolina Bar, conditioned upon Petitioner entering into a three-year monitoring agreement with Lawyers Helping Lawyers that includes random drug and alcohol testing and the filing of quarterly compliance reports with the Commission on Lawyer Conduct. s/ John W. Kittredge C.J. s/ John Cannon Few J. s/ George C. James, Jr. J. s/ D. Garrison Hill J. s/ Letitia H. Verdin J.
Columbia, South Carolina April 1, 2026
Related changes
Get daily alerts for SC Court Orders
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from SC Supreme Court.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when SC Court Orders publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.