Aniel Escobar v. State of Florida - Rule 3.800(a) Appeal Affirmed
Summary
The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, affirmed the Circuit Court's denial of a Rule 3.800(a) motion in Palm Beach County. Appellant Aniel Escobar, appearing pro se from Zephyrhills, challenged the sentence calculation in case number 502010CF011242AXXXMB. The three-judge panel (Ciklin, Conner, and Shaw) issued a per curiam affirmance with no oral argument required for the State. The ruling becomes final upon disposition of any timely-filed motion for rehearing.
“Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Daliah Handel Weiss, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502010CF011242AXXXMB.”
About this source
Florida's District Courts of Appeal sit between the trial courts and the Florida Supreme Court. Six districts cover the state, hearing appeals on civil judgments, criminal convictions, family law orders, and administrative decisions. This feed tracks every published opinion across all six districts, around 125 a month, with the case name, appellant, type of relief sought, and outcome. Watch this if you practice civil litigation in Florida, defend insurance disputes (the carriers fight a lot of appeals here), or follow Florida's busy criminal post-conviction docket. GovPing pulls from CourtListener's official mirror of the courts' RSS feeds.
What changed
The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of a Rule 3.800(a) motion challenging sentence calculation. Aniel Escobar, proceeding pro se from Zephyrhills, received an unfavorable ruling from the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. The per curiam disposition was unanimous among the three presiding judges with no oral argument required for the State.
This ruling has no precedential value beyond the individual case and imposes no compliance obligations on any class of regulated parties. It represents a routine procedural appellate outcome with no broader regulatory implications.
Archived snapshot
Apr 23, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
April 23, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Aniel Escobar W v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 4D2025-3494
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
ANIEL ESCOBAR,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-3494
[April 23, 2026]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for
the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Daliah Handel Weiss,
Judge; L.T. Case No. 502010CF011242AXXXMB.
Aniel Escobar, Zephyrhills, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
CIKLIN, CONNER and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Named provisions
Parties
Related changes
Get daily alerts for FL District Court of Appeal Opinions
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from FL District.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.