Indiana AG Co-Leads Brief Opposing Prisoner Sex-Change Surgeries

Indiana AG - Newsroom

Filed March 26th, 2026

Detected March 26th, 2026

Summary

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita co-led a multi-state brief in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals arguing against court-ordered sex-change surgeries for prisoners. The brief contends that the Eighth Amendment does not mandate such surgeries and that state authority over prison medical care should be upheld.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita, alongside other state AGs, filed an amicus curiae brief in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case Emalee R. Wagoner v. Jennifer Winkelman. The brief argues that the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment does not require states to provide sex-change surgeries to prisoners, and that a lower court's order directing a prisoner for surgical consultation exceeds constitutional limits and infringes on states' authority over prison medical care.

This action is significant as it seeks to prevent a nationwide precedent that could compel states to fund or provide these surgeries, even in states that do not offer them to the general population. Compliance officers in state correctional systems and legal departments should be aware of this ongoing legal challenge and its potential implications for prison healthcare policies and budgets.

What to do next

Review state correctional healthcare policies regarding gender-affirming care.
Monitor legal developments in the Ninth Circuit case Emalee R. Wagoner v. Jennifer Winkelman.
Assess potential budgetary impacts if a nationwide precedent for prisoner sex-change surgeries is established.

Source document (simplified)

Attorney General Todd Rokita co-leads multi-state brief opposing court-ordered sex-change surgeries for prisoners

Thursday, March 26, 2026

I'm Interested
-
-
-

I'm Interested About this Event

Add to calendar

Add to calendar Attorney General Todd Rokita co-leads multi-state brief opposing court-ordered sex-change surgeries for prisoners

Attorney General Todd Rokita, together with Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador and a coalition of xx states, has filed an amicus curiae brief in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals strongly arguing that the Eighth Amendment does not require states to provide prisoners with risky, controversial, and medically debated sex-change surgeries.

The case, Emalee R. Wagoner v. Jennifer Winkelman, Commissioner of Department of Corrections (No. 25-6813), arises from a U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska order directing the state to refer the prisoner for surgical consultation. The multi-state brief argues that this ruling exceeds constitutional limits and overrides states' authority over prison medical care and policy, so the decision should be reversed.

According to Attorney General Rokita, Indiana is co-leading this brief because a ruling upholding the order could create a nationwide precedent. That would pressure prison systems across the country—including in Indiana—to provide or pay for similar surgeries, even though many states do not offer them to inmates or even to free citizens.

"The Eighth Amendment stops cruel and unusual punishment. It doesn’t give prisoners the right to demand risky, optional surgeries when doctors and scientists still strongly disagree about whether they’re safe or even helpful," said Attorney General Rokita. "If courts force states to provide these expensive, controversial procedures in one prison, it will open the floodgates everywhere—putting Hoosier taxpayers and families across the country on the hook for hundreds of thousands of dollars per surgery in virtually every state. We cannot let that happen. We have to win this case to protect hardworking taxpayers from footing the bill for these insane surgeries.”

The brief stresses that the Eighth Amendment bars deliberate indifference to serious medical needs but does not guarantee prisoners access to any particular treatment—especially those that are unproven, highly debated, and carry significant risks with uncertain benefits.

It notes that such surgeries are unavailable to free citizens in nearly half of U.S. states, underscoring they are not a basic necessity. The amici also contend that prior Ninth Circuit case law does not require these procedures, and mandating out-of-state prisoner transfers for unavailable care raises major federalism issues and conflicts with the Prison Litigation Reform Act.

The coalition asks the Ninth Circuit to vacate the district court’s injunction and affirm states’ discretion in managing prisoner healthcare and corrections.

Attached is the brief.

A headshot of Attorney General Rokita is available online.