Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal AG Bonta Leads Multistate Comment Letter Opposi...
Routine Notice Added Final

AG Bonta Leads Multistate Comment Letter Opposing DHS Rule Limiting Asylum Seeker Work Permits

Favicon for oag.ca.gov California AG Charities
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

California Attorney General Bonta led a multistate coalition of 20 attorneys general in filing a comment letter with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security opposing a proposed rule that would modify Employment Authorization Document (EAD) requirements for asylum seekers. The DHS rule would increase the waiting period to apply for EADs from six months to one year, expand adjudication times from 30 days to up to 180 days, and pause acceptance of all new EAD applications while DHS processing time exceeds 180 days. The coalition estimates this would cause lost compensation to asylum seekers of up to $126.6 billion annually and expose applicants to exploitation and economic instability.

“DHS's proposed rule would increase the waiting period for asylum seekers to apply for EADs from six months to one year.”

CA AG , verbatim from source
Published by CA AG on oag.ca.gov . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors California AG Charities for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 7 changes logged to date.

What changed

California's Attorney General filed a formal comment letter on behalf of a 20-state coalition opposing a Department of Homeland Security proposed rule that would restrict asylum seekers' access to work authorization documents. The rule would extend the initial EAD waiting period from 180 days to 365 days, lengthen adjudication windows to 180 days, and indefinitely suspend new applications while processing backlogs persist. The coalition argues the rule would harm immigrant workers through reduced health insurance access, food insecurity, and exposure to exploitative labor conditions, while decreasing state tax revenues and increasing burden on nonprofits and law enforcement. Affected employers and immigrant advocacy organizations should monitor this rulemaking and consider submitting independent comments before the DHS comment period closes.

Archived snapshot

Apr 27, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Attorney General Bonta Opposes Barriers to Legal Work Authorization for Asylum Seekers

  1. Press Release
  2. Attorney General Bonta Opposes Barriers to Legal Work Author… Monday, April 27, 2026 Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov Defends California’s workforce, economy, and immigrant communities

OAKLAND — California Attorney General Bonta last week led a multistate comment letter opposing the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) proposed rule that would modify filing and eligibility requirements for individuals seeking Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) based on a pending asylum application. Among other things, the rule would effectively pause EAD application processing indefinitely for asylum seekers. In the comment letter, Attorney General Bonta urges DHS to forego the proposed rulemaking because it will leave applicants vulnerable to exploitation and without the appropriate authorization documents that enable asylum seekers to support themselves and safely contribute to California’s economy.

“Asylum seekers need a fair and efficient system that allows them to work legally while they await decisions on their applications for asylum, which will allow them to contribute to our communities and build lives,” said Attorney General Bonta. “I am committed to defending and empowering immigrants to support their families and help our communities thrive, while protecting California's economic and humanitarian interests from unjustified obstacles created by the Trump Administration. Once again, the federal government has taken drastic measures — indefinitely pausing critical legal work authorizations for asylum seekers that will have serious consequences. I strongly oppose this proposed rule.”

DHS’s proposed rule would increase the waiting period for asylum seekers to apply for EADs from six months to one year. After the one-year waiting period, adjudication times for initial applications could expand from 30 days to up to 180 days. Most significantly, the rule would pause the acceptance of all new EAD applications for asylum seekers while DHS’ asylum application processing time exceeds 180 days — something DHS estimates could last for decades — effectively suspending asylum seekers’ access to work authorization indefinitely. The impact of this rule will be devastating for those seeking asylum who will be unable to work lawfully and support their families while their asylum applications are pending. This will inevitably lead to various workforce problems and general economic instability, with lost compensation to asylum seekers up to $126.6 billion annually.

In the comment letter, Attorney General Bonta and the coalition assert the proposed rule:

  • Will harm immigrant workers by negatively impacting their physical and mental health, food security, ability to secure stable housing, access to employer-sponsored health insurance and legal services, and forcing many into dangerous and exploitative work situations.
  • Will harm California and other states by decreasing tax revenue and the spending power of residents, increasing healthcare costs, increasing the burden on state-funded nonprofits, and increasing law enforcement challenges.
  • Is arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act because DHS's reasoning is contrary to evidence and fails to consider the harmful effects and scope of impact. In filing the comment letter, Attorney General Bonta is joined by the attorneys general of Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai’i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and the District of Columbia.

#

Get daily alerts for California AG Charities

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from CA AG.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
CA AG
Published
April 27th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Branch
Executive
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Government agencies Employers Immigration detainees
Industry sector
9211 Government & Public Administration
Activity scope
Work authorization Immigration processing Employment eligibility
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Immigration
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Employment & Labor Consumer Protection Public Health

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when California AG Charities publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!