United States

Draft Air Permit for Jamul Casino Resort

EPA Region 9 has issued a draft air permit (EPA-R09-OAR-2025-0454-0022) for the Jamul Casino Resort project in San Diego County, California. The draft permit establishes air emissions requirements and operating conditions for the proposed resort. The permit is open for public comment, allowing stakeholders to review and submit feedback on the proposed conditions before finalization.

ESA 7(d) Determination for Inpyrfluxam Fungicide Amendments

The EPA issued a determination under Endangered Species Act Section 7(d) regarding Inpyrfluxam fungicide amendments. The determination addresses effects determinations for listed species and critical habitat. The document, associated with docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0433, provides the EPA's assessment of pesticide effects on federally protected species.

Jamul Casino Resort Final Air Quality Permit

EPA Region 9 has issued a final air quality permit for the Jamul Casino Resort project located in Jamul, California. The permit establishes emission limits and compliance requirements for construction and operation activities. This final permit completes the EPA's review under the Clean Air Act for this tribal casino development project.

Jamul Casino Resort Clean Air Act Title V Operating Permit

EPA Region 9 issued a final Title V operating permit for the Jamul Casino Resort in San Diego County, California. The permit establishes emission limits, monitoring requirements, and reporting obligations under the Clean Air Act for this tribal gaming facility. This is a routine permit issuance administrative action.

Jamul Casino Resort Air Quality Permit Final Action

EPA Region 9 issued a final action on the air quality permit for Jamul Casino Resort in California. The action concludes the agency's review of the permit application under the Clean Air Act. Affected parties include the permit applicant and any interested stakeholders who submitted comments during the public comment period.

p-Dichlorobenzene Correspondence Memo

EPA OPPT received a correspondence memo from Marubeni regarding p-Dichlorobenzene as part of docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0446. The document appears to be an industry submission in a chemical substance review proceeding. No new regulatory requirements or deadlines were identified in the available content.

USA v. Casildo - Career Offender Enhancement Under § 4B1.1(a)

The Ninth Circuit reversed the District Court for the District of Idaho's dismissal of Francis R. Casildo's § 2255 motion, holding that his Nevada conviction under § 453.321(1)(a) was improperly used as a predicate offense for career offender status under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(a). The panel found that Nevada's statute is overbroad relative to federal drug trafficking definitions and its actus reus clause is indivisible. The case was remanded for resentencing without the career offender enhancement.

Judicial Misconduct Complaint Dismissal

The Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit dismissed a judicial misconduct complaint (No. 25-90232) filed by a pro se litigant against a district judge. The complainant alleged the judge lied and falsified facts when imposing a prefiling order limiting his ability to file employment-related lawsuits. The council dismissed the complaint as merits-related, unfounded, and duplicative of prior complaints (Nos. 25-90021, 24-90130, 23-90003).

In re Connolly Ryan - Crime Victims' Rights Act Challenge to Boeing Non-Prosecution Agreement

The Fifth Circuit denied petitions for writ of mandamus filed by victims' families challenging the DOJ's non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Boeing and the subsequent dismissal of prosecution. The court affirmed that while the DOJ violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by failing to confer with families before the agreement, the violation resulted from legal error rather than bad faith, and the district court lacked authority to modify the NPA terms. Boeing's $1.1 billion settlement and the dismissal remain intact.

Boeing NPA Mandamus - Crime Victims' Rights Act Review

The Fifth Circuit denied petitions for writ of mandamus filed by victims' families challenging the Department of Justice's non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Boeing following the 737 MAX crashes that killed 346 people. The court affirmed the district court's ruling that DOJ did not violate the families' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, despite DOJ's earlier failure to confer with families before the NPA.