UOKiK Fines Six Parties PLN 1.57M for Fruit Centre Price-Fixing
Summary
The President of UOKiK issued fines totalling PLN 1,576,000 against five fruit purchasing companies and one individual for price-fixing in Greater Poland. Fructis, Damex, Silver-Trans, Kam-Pol, and Kalbrok coordinated fruit purchase prices via instant messaging apps over three harvest seasons (2022–2024), forcing farmers to accept below-market rates. Evidence was obtained from messaging platforms during premises searches at Fructis. The decision may be appealed.
What changed
The President of UOKiK fined six parties for participating in a price-fixing agreement restricting competition in the fruit purchasing market. The five companies and one individual coordinated purchase prices via messaging apps across three harvest seasons (2022–2024), affecting farmers in the Konin district. The collusion was evidenced by instant messaging records showing price exchanges and coordination to avoid competition.
Businesses operating in agricultural supply chains should note that UOKiK actively monitors and enforces competition law at the purchasing level. The decision demonstrates the authority's willingness to pursue cartel conduct even at regional levels and among smaller operators. Parallel pricing—adjusting prices based on competitor observation without agreement—remains lawful, but the evidence threshold for proving illegal coordination is met here through direct messaging evidence.
Penalties
PLN 1,576,000 total: Damex PLN 452,000; Kam-Pol PLN 391,000; Fructis PLN 299,000; Kalbrok PLN 265,000; Silver-Trans PLN 59,000; Andrzej Sarnowski (CEO of Fructis) PLN 110,000
Archived snapshot
Apr 21, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
- Farmers and fruit growers in Greater Poland were forced to sell their fruit at below-market prices for over two years.
- This was the result of price-fixing by fruit purchasing centres.
- The President of UOKiK imposed fines totalling over PLN 1.5 million on five businesses and one individual. The same low purchase prices for fruit, such as cherries and currants, were observed across the entire region. It was not profitable to transport fruit to more distant locations where prices were higher. This was the situation faced by farmers in the Konin district and the surrounding area. The cause was price-fixing by fruit buyers operating in the region: Fructis of Wierzbie (Wielkopolskie), Damex of Nowa Wieś (Wielkopolskie), Silver-Trans of Sompolno (Wielkopolskie), Kam-Pol of Biała Rawska (Łódzkie), and Kalbrok of Sielice (Mazowieckie). The unlawful agreement lasted for three fruit harvesting seasons between 2022 and 2024. Throughout each purchasing season, the operators regularly exchanged information via messaging apps regarding fruit purchase prices and set prices at their respective collection points.
– The aim of the collusion was to set fruit purchase prices as low as possible. This meant that farmers from Greater Poland received reduced rates for their hard work over three harvest seasons – says the President of UOKiK, Tomasz Chróstny.
Evidence from instant messaging platforms
One piece of evidence of unlawful agreement was information obtained from the business owners’ instant messaging platforms during a search of Fructis’s premises. This material confirms that information regarding fruit prices was exchanged and demonstrates that the aim of the collusion was to avoid price competition between the owners of fruit purchasing centres. Below are examples of messages (translated from Polish):
We’ve got to come up with something. It’s crazy to be competing like this (…) Let me know what we’re doing. I can compete on price, but it’s not healthy for any of us.
– Hey, what are the prices for cherries and currants today? – Cherries 2.30, currants 2.20, net prices
Fines
The President of UOKiK issued a decision imposing financial sanctions totalling PLN 1.57 million for participation in an agreement restricting competition. Among those penalised is the CEO of Fructis, who was directly responsible for the operation of the collusion.
Amounts of individual fines:
- Damex – PLN 452,000
- Kam-Pol – PLN 391,000
- Fructis – PLN 299,000
- Kalbrok – PLN 265,000
- Silver-Trans – PLN 59,000
- Andrzej Sarnowski – PLN 110,000 The decision of the President of UOKiK is not final and may be appealed to the court.
UOKiK for farmers
– Protecting Polish farmers is one of our priorities. This is yet another intervention aimed at improving their situation. We will also continue to monitor the market during this year’s harvest season – says Tomasz Chróstny, President of UOKiK.
Investigations are currently underway following inspections at three major processors: Austria Juice Poland, Döhler, and Rauch Polska, as well as at three entities with purchasing centres: Przetwórstwo Owoców i Warzyw Anna Wagnerowska, Makofrost (both from Opole Lubelskie), and Frutica of Lewiczyn. We are verifying whether price fixing may have occurred at any level of trade under examination. The proceedings are conducted in rem, not against any specific entrepreneurs.
Price-fixing versus parallel pricing
It is worth highlighting the difference between prohibited price-fixing and legally permitted parallel pricing. The former involves agreements to fix prices, that is, joint and coordinated actions by independent businesses. The latter, however, involves observing competitors’ prices and adjusting one’s own prices accordingly. This is a very significant distinction – a low or even identical price in several places does not automatically mean that there is a price-fixing agreement, i.e. an illegal practice.
You can seek redress
Anyone who has suffered a loss as a result of a breach of competition law may file a civil lawsuit against any of the entities that have broken the law. Claims for compensation may be pursued under the Act on Private Enforcement, which came into force in 2017. The President of UOKiK has prepared and published a study in which he provides a closer look at the regulations on these issues.
The leniency programme
The maximum fines for participation in an anti-competitive agreement is 10 per cent of turnover for business entity and PLN 2 million for managers. Severe penalties for participation in collusion can be avoided through the leniency scheme. It offers businesses involved in an illegal agreement and managers responsible for collusion an opportunity to reduce a sanction or, in some cases, avoid it altogether. It is intended for those who agree to cooperate with the President of UOKiK as a “crown witness” and provide evidence or information regarding the existence of a prohibited agreement. We encourage those interested in the leniency scheme to contact UOKiK at a dedicated phone number: 22 55 60 555. UOKiK staff will answer any questions about the leniency programme, including anonymous ones.
A platform for whistleblowers
We also remind you that we have a platform for obtaining information from anonymous whistleblowers. Do you wish to inform UOKiK about competition-restricting practices? Visit https://uokik.whiblo.pl/ and fill out a simple form. The system we use guarantees full anonymity, including from UOKiK.
Files to download
Press release (2026.04.21) 0.14 MB
docx
Information for the media
| | +48 603 124 154 |
| | biuroprasowe@uokik.gov.pl |
| | Pl. Powstańców Warszawy 1
00-950 Warszawa |
Follow us
Report a violation of competition law
fruits, agriculture, competition protection, price fixing, decision, penalty
See also
Collusion in the purchase of soft fruit? President of UOKiK brings charges 29.09.2025
Collusion in the sale of agricultural machinery – decision of the President of UOKiK 08.12.2025
UOKiK investigates the practices of Polskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne 11.03.2026
UOKiK in 2025: Nearly a thousand decisions, over one billion zlotys in fines 05.03.2026
Compensation from Enter Air – a decision by the President of UOKiK 16.04.2026
Payment backlogs – actions taken by the President of UOKiK since the beginning of 2026 14.04.2026
Newsletter
Stay up to date!
Related changes
Get daily alerts for Poland UOKiK Competition Authority News
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from UOKiK.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Poland UOKiK Competition Authority News publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.