Federal court opinions shape regulatory interpretation across every industry. GovPing monitors slip opinions from all 13 circuit courts of appeal and the US Supreme Court, AI-summarizing each decision with attention-level ratings so you can focus on the rulings that matter to your practice.
Recent changes
Saturday, March 7, 2026
Kellogg v. Nichols - Judicial Immunity and Firearms Licensing
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals amended its opinion in Kellogg v. Nichols, affirming that state judges have absolute judicial immunity for decisions on firearms license applications. The court also held that Article III's case-or-controversy requirement bars federal claims for injunctive and declaratory relief against judges in their official capacities regarding these decisions.
United States v. Aryeetey - Felon in Possession of Firearm
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivan Joel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.
Care One LLC v NLRB - Court Opinion
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One LLC and affiliated healthcare facilities. The facilities sought to halt NLRB proceedings, arguing the ALJ was improperly appointed and protected from removal. The court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm.
B.B. v. Hochul - Child Welfare Certification Rights
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's dismissal of a case brought by foster children against New York officials. The court found that the plaintiffs have standing to challenge the state's certification scheme for relative foster parents and adoption, reversing the district court's ruling on standing.
McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. - Copyright Infringement Appeal
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's ruling in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. The court affirmed the dismissal of copyright management information claims but vacated the summary judgment on copyright infringement claims, remanding for further proceedings on specific factual issues.
Reidy Contracting Group v. Mt. Hawley Insurance - Insurance Coverage Dispute
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision in favor of Reidy Contracting Group, holding that Mt. Hawley Insurance Company must provide additional insured coverage. The court found Reidy to be an additional insured and that the Employers Liability Exclusion was ambiguous and thus construed against Mt. Hawley.
US v. Cardenas - Second Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jay James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence crucial to Cardenas's defense of lacking criminal intent, remanding the case for further proceedings.
United States v. William Jimenez - Appeal of Conviction Conditions
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment against William Jimenez. The court found that the special conditions of supervised release, including electronic device searches and mental health counseling, were properly imposed and that an appeal waiver barred challenges to his sentence term.
Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Penalty Assessment
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties for failure to report foreign business control under IRC ยง 6038(b) through administrative assessment, overturning a Tax Court decision. This ruling impacts how the IRS collects such penalties.
Mar-Can Transport vs Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Mar-Can Transport Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund, ruling that Mar-Can is entitled to a $1.8 million reduction in its ERISA withdrawal liability. The court interpreted a key provision of ERISA concerning the transfer of unfunded vested benefits when employees switch union representation.
Last 7 days
Most active sources
Browse Categories
Activity
Get daily alerts
Morning digest delivered to your inbox. Free.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
25 monitored sources
Get Federal Courts alerts
Daily digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get Federal Courts alerts
We'll email you when new federal courts changes are detected.