Federal Courts

Gomez v. US - Criminal Conviction Affirmed

The Ninth Circuit affirmed a methamphetamine conviction for Gomez, finding that the district court properly applied a violence enhancement to his sentence. The court reviewed the evidence supporting the enhancement and found it sufficient.

US v. Rodriguez - Sentencing Enhancement

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed sentencing enhancements for career offenders in a methamphetamine and fentanyl case. The court clarified the application of career-offender provisions, impacting how certain drug offenses are penalized.

USA v Ruiz - Criminal Conviction Affirmed

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of USA v Ruiz, upholding a 33-month imprisonment sentence. This decision finalizes the appellate review of the criminal case.

NLRB v. Labor Unions - Labor Law Dispute

A federal court of appeals issued an opinion in a case involving the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and labor unions. The ruling clarifies the application of labor laws in disputes between the NLRB and unionized workforces.

NLRB v. Machinists and Longshore Unions

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in a case involving the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Machinists and Longshore Unions. The ruling addresses specific labor relations issues, potentially impacting union organizing and collective bargaining practices.

NLRB Case Opinion

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in a case involving the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The opinion addresses specific legal interpretations and applications related to labor practices.

Ninth Circuit Orders En Banc Rehearing for NLRB Cases

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered an en banc rehearing for cases involving the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). This means a larger panel of judges will review previous decisions, potentially impacting labor law interpretations nationwide.

Court Denies Asylum Petition Upholding BIA Decision

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied an asylum petition, upholding a previous decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The court found no error in the BIA's determination that the petitioner did not meet the eligibility criteria for asylum.