SEC Interpretation Clarifying Crypto Asset Securities Classification
Summary
The SEC issued an Interpretative Release on March 17, 2026, clarifying which crypto assets are and are not securities under federal securities laws. The release identifies four categories of crypto assets not considered securities: Digital Commodities, Digital Collectibles, Digital Tools, and Stablecoins meeting the GENIUS Act definition. The CFTC joined the interpretation, confirming alignment with its administration of the Commodity Exchange Act. The guidance provides significant clarity on applying the Howey test to crypto assets and investment contracts.
What changed
The SEC issued an Interpretative Release clarifying the classification of crypto assets under federal securities laws. The release identifies four types of crypto assets that are NOT securities: Digital Commodities (programmatically operated crypto systems), Digital Collectibles (artwork, music, trading cards, in-game items), Digital Tools (memberships, tickets, credentials, identity badges), and Stablecoins (permitted payment stablecoins under the GENIUS Act). The release confirms that Digital Securities (tokenized securities) remain within the definition of security under federal securities laws. The guidance applies the Howey test, finding that investment contracts exist when there is an investment of money in a common enterprise with reasonable expectation of profits from the essential managerial or entrepreneurial efforts of others, based on explicit issuer representations or promises.\n\nCrypto asset issuers, platforms, and investors should review existing tokens and offerings against these new classifications. Entities offering crypto assets previously subject to uncertain classification should reassess whether their assets fall within the four non-security categories or remain subject to securities laws. Platforms dealing in assets classified as non-securities may be subject to CFTC jurisdiction under the Commodity Exchange Act. The CFTC's endorsement of this interpretation indicates coordinated federal regulatory approach. Issuers should ensure marketing materials and white papers do not contain explicit profit representations that would trigger security classification under the clarified Howey test analysis.
What to do next
- Review existing crypto asset classifications against the four new categories (Digital Commodities, Digital Collectibles, Digital Tools, Stablecoins)
- Update offering materials and marketing to avoid explicit profit representations that would trigger Howey test security classification
- Consult with legal counsel to determine whether platform activities involving non-security crypto assets trigger CFTC jurisdiction
Archived snapshot
Apr 3, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
April 2, 2026
The SEC Releases New Interpretation on Crypto Assets
Eric Mikkelson, Carissa Occhipinto Stinson LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed
On March 17, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued an Interpretative Release related to how federal securities laws will be applied to many cryptocurrency assets and related transactions. This release clarifies the SEC's approach in an area otherwise historically challenged with much uncertainty, especially with respect to the fundamental regulatory question of which crypto assets are considered securities and which aren't.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) joined the interpretation, confirming the CFTC will administer the Commodity Exchange Act consistent with the SEC's interpretation. Some crypto assets that are not considered securities will instead meet the definition of "commodity" and thus be regulated by the CFTC.
This new guidance is part of a series of recent federal regulatory decisions, guidance, laws and orders, including Project Crypto launched by the SEC last year, which have provided substantially greater clarity in this growing sector of the economy.
Classification of Crypto Assets
In its interpretation, the SEC identified four types of crypto assets that are not considered securities under federal securities laws:
- Digital Commodities: crypto assets that are intrinsically linked to and derive their value from the programmatic operation of a functional crypto system.
- Digital Collectibles: crypto assets that are designed to be collected and/or used and may represent or convey rights to artwork, music, videos, trading cards, in-game items, or digital representations or references to internet memes, characters, current events, or trends.
- Digital Tools: crypto assets that perform a practical function, such as memberships, tickets, credentials, title instruments, or identity badges.
- Stablecoins: payment stablecoin issued by a permitted payment stablecoin issuer, as defined in the recent GENIUS Act. This release also confirmed that digital securities (or "tokenized securities") are financial instruments that fall within the definition of "security" under federal securities laws. Digital securities are formatted as or represented by a crypto asset, where the record of ownership is maintained in whole or in part on or through one or more crypto networks.
Investment Contracts
In addition, the SEC explained that otherwise non-security crypto assets may be considered securities and thus subject to federal securities laws if offered and sold pursuant to an investment contract. This occurs, for example, when there is an investment of money in a common enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profits derived from the essential managerial or entrepreneurial efforts of others, based on the issuer's representations or promises. These tests flow from the long-standing "Howey test" articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court on the question of what is and what isn't a security, found in SEC v. W.J. Howey Co.
The analysis focuses on the nature of the issuer's representations or promises necessary to form an investment contract. Specifically, explicit and unambiguous (written or oral) representations demonstrating the issuer's ability to implement the proposed project and provide profits to the purchaser resulting from managerial efforts by the issuer are more likely to give rise to reasonable reliance. On the other hand, vague or generalized statements are unlikely to do so.
Furthermore, otherwise non-security crypto assets that are determined to be securities for a time for reasons described above can cease to be subject to federal securities laws if the relevant investment contract no longer exists or terminates. This happens when the issuer has either fulfilled its representations or promises or has failed to satisfy its representations or promises.
The release further explains that "protocol mining," "protocol staking," and the "wrapping" of an otherwise non-security crypto asset do not generally involve the offer and sale of a security, and that certain crypto asset disseminations known as "airdrops" do not involve an investment of money under Howey.
As an interpretation of the SEC's views, the release states that it takes effect immediately.
Applying Howey to evolving crypto assets and transactions can be challenging because of the novelty, variety and evolving nature of such products. The release provides additional significant clarity in the space.
Latest Posts
- The SEC Releases New Interpretation on Crypto Assets
- U.S. Department of Labor Seeks to Rescind and Replace Biden-Era Independent Contractor Classification Rule
- Fifth Circuit Denies Stay — Parties May Immediately Revert to Pre-2025 HSR Form
- New DoW Policy Requires Proactive HSR Filing Submissions for Defense-Related M&A Transactions
- OCC Finalizes Amendments to Affirm the Authority of National Trust Banks to Engage in Non-Fiduciary Activities See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.
©
Stinson LLP
Written by:
Stinson LLP Contact + Follow Eric Mikkelson + Follow Carissa Occhipinto + Follow more less
PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA
- ✔ Increased readership
- ✔ Actionable analytics
- ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra
Published In:
Blockchain + Follow CFTC + Follow Cryptoassets + Follow Cryptocurrency + Follow Digital Assets + Follow Digital Securities + Follow Howey + Follow New Guidance + Follow Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) + Follow Securities Regulation + Follow Stablecoins + Follow Tokenization + Follow Administrative Agency + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow Science, Computers & Technology + Follow Securities + Follow more less
Stinson LLP on:
"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for JD Supra Finance & Banking
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from SEC.
The plain-English summary, classification, and "what to do next" steps are AI-generated from the original text. Cite the source document, not the AI analysis.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when JD Supra Finance & Banking publishes new changes.