Prime Mortgage Funding License Revoked
Summary
The Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) has revoked the mortgage broker license of Prime Mortgage Funding, Inc. The revocation is retroactive to December 31, 2024, following allegations of providing false asset documentation to lenders. This action resolves Enforcement Case No. 25-18668.
What changed
The Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) has issued an Order Accepting Stipulation, revoking the mortgage broker license of Prime Mortgage Funding, Inc. (FL-0020387, Enforcement Case No. 25-18668). The revocation is retroactive to December 31, 2024. DIFS had previously asserted that the Respondent provided false asset documentation to lenders, violating the Mortgage Brokers, Lenders, and Servicers Licensing Act (MBLSLA).
Prime Mortgage Funding, Inc. has agreed to the revocation by signing a Stipulation to Entry of Order, neither admitting nor denying the allegations. This action signifies the final resolution of the enforcement case. Regulated entities should note the serious consequences of providing false documentation to lenders and the potential for license revocation. No specific compliance deadline is mentioned for other entities, as this is an individual enforcement action.
What to do next
- Review internal documentation practices for accuracy and completeness.
- Ensure all submissions to DIFS comply with MBLSLA requirements.
Penalties
License revoked retroactively to December 31, 2024.
Source document (simplified)
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of the Department of Insurance and Financial Services In the matter of: Prime Mortgage Funding, Inc. FL-0020387 Enforcement Case No. 25-18668 NMLS ID: 1475017 Respondent. _____________________________/ Issued and entered On March 16, 2026 by Aaron Luetzow Senior Deputy Director ORDER ACCEPTING STIPULATION Based upon the Stipulation to Entry of Order and the files and records of the Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) in this matter, the Senior Deputy Director finds and concludes that: 1. The Senior Deputy Director has jurisdiction and authority to adopt and issue this Order Accepting Stipulation in this proceeding pursuant to the Mortgage Brokers, Lenders, and Servicers Licensing Act (MBLSLA), MCL 445.1651 et seq., and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act (APA), MCL 24.201 et seq. 2. Acceptance of the Stipulation to Entry of Order is reasonable and in the public interest. 3. All applicable provisions of the MBLSLA and the APA, including but not limited to the notice and service provisions, have been either satisfied or waived by all Parties. 4. On or about December 9, 2025, DIFS served a Notice of Opportunity to Show Compliance (NOSC) on Respondent. In the NOSC, DIFS asserted that Respondent provided false asset documentation to lenders, and thus, violated the MBLSLA pursuant to Section 22(b) of the MBLSLA, MCL 445.1672(b). DIFS further asserted in the NOSC that Respondent justification for the Director to order the payment of a civil fine and/or other licensing sanctions pursuant to Section 29(2) of the MBLSLA, MCL 445.1679(2). 5. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set forth in the NOSC, but it has agreed to the Stipulation to Entry of Order to resolve this matter. Now therefore, based upon the Stipulation to Entry of Order and the facts surrounding this case, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 6. All agreements contained in the Stipulation to Entry of Order are accepted and adopted in their entirety.
Order Accepting Stipulation Respondent Prime Mortgage Funding, Inc. Enforcement Case No. 25-18668 Page 2 of 2 7. Respondent shall comply with all terms agreed to in the Stipulation to Entry of Order. A failure to comply with a term in the Stipulation shall be deemed a violation of this Order. 8. Respondent MBLSLA license is hereby REVOKED, retroactively effective to December 31, 2024. 9. The Senior Deputy Director retains jurisdiction over the matters contained herein and has the authority to issue such further order(s) as shall be deemed just, necessary, and appropriate in accordance with the MBLSLA. Failure to abide by the terms and provisions of the Stipulation to Entry of Order and this Order may result in the commencement of additional proceedings. Dated: March 16, 2026 Senior Deputy Director ____________________________________ Aaron Luetzow
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of the Department of Insurance and Financial Services In the matter of: Prime Mortgage Funding, Inc. FL-0020387 Enforcement Case No. 25-18668 NMLS ID: 1475017 Respondent. ____________________________/ STIPULATION TO ENTRY OF ORDER Prime Mortgage Funding, Inc. (Respondent) stipulates to the following: 1. Respondent was a licensed mortgage broker under the Mortgage Brokers, Lenders, and Servicers 2. Respondent had the opportunity to have this Order Accepting Stipulation and Stipulation to Entry of Order reviewed by legal counsel. 3. Respondent has read and understands this Consent Order. 4. Respondent understands that Respondent has a right to a hearing before an administrative law judge, at which DIFS would be required to prove the charges set forth by presentation of evidence and legal authority and at which Respondent would be entitled to appear, to cross-examine all witnesses presented by DIFS, and to present such testimony or other evidence or legal authority deemed appropriate as a defense to said charges. Respondent understands and intends that by agreeing to the Consent Order, Respondent is knowingly and voluntarily waiving right, pursuant to the MBLSLA, the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), MCL 24.201 et seq., and applicable administrative rules to a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. 5. Respondent agrees that all parties have complied with the procedural requirements of the MBLSLA and the APA. 6. The Senior Deputy Director retains jurisdiction over the matters contained herein. 7. On or about December 9, 2025, DIFS served a Notice of Opportunity to Show Compliance (NOSC) on Respondent. In the NOSC, DIFS asserted that Respondent provided false asset documentation to lenders, and thus, violated the MBLSLA pursuant to Section 22(b) of the MBLSLA, MCL Director to order the payment of a civil fine and/or other licensing sanctions pursuant to Section 29(2) of the MBLSLA, MCL 445.1679(2).
3/12/2026
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Banking & Finance alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when MI DIFS Directors Orders publishes new changes.