MEMX LLC Proposes Equities Transaction Fee Schedule Amendment

Legal Status This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.

The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.

The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.

Legal Status

Notice

Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Fee Schedule Concerning Equities Transaction Pricing

A Notice by the Securities and Exchange Commission on 04/13/2026

• 1.

1.

• Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agency Securities and Exchange Commission Agency/Docket Numbers Release No. 34-105183 File No. SR-MEMX-2026-09 Document Citation 91 FR 18905 Document Number 2026-07045 Document Type Notice Pages 18905-18908
  (4 pages) Publication Date 04/13/2026 Published Content - Document Details

• PDF Official Content

  • View printed version (PDF) Official Content

• Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agency Securities and Exchange Commission Agency/Docket Numbers Release No. 34-105183 File No. SR-MEMX-2026-09 Document Citation 91 FR 18905 Document Number 2026-07045 Document Type Notice Pages 18905-18908
  (4 pages) Publication Date 04/13/2026 Published Content - Document Details

• Table of Contents Enhanced Content - Table of Contents This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
  headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
  This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
  has no substantive legal effect.

  • Footnotes Enhanced Content - Table of Contents

• Public Comments Enhanced Content - Public Comments This feature is not available for this document.

Enhanced Content - Public Comments
- Regulations.gov Data Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data Additional information is not currently available for this document.

Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data

- Sharing Enhanced Content - Sharing Shorter Document URL https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2026-07045 Email Email this document to a friend Enhanced Content - Sharing

• Print Enhanced Content - Print
  • Print this document Enhanced Content - Print
• Document Statistics Enhanced Content - Document Statistics Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.

Page views 21
as of
04/12/2026 at 10:15 am EDT Enhanced Content - Document Statistics
- Other Formats Enhanced Content - Other Formats This document is also available in the following formats:

JSON Normalized attributes and metadata XML Original full text XML MODS Government Publishing Office metadata More information and documentation can be found in our developer tools pages.

Enhanced Content - Other Formats
- Public Inspection Public Inspection This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-07045 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
04/10/2026 at 8:45 am.

It was viewed
10
times while on Public Inspection.

If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507. Learn more here.

Public Inspection
Published Document: 2026-07045 (91 FR 18905) This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain
the following:

1. the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
2. the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
3. the agency docket number / agency internal file number
4. the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.

Securities and Exchange Commission

1. Release No. 34-105183; File No. SR-MEMX-2026-09 April 8, 2026. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”), [1 ] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, [2 ] notice is hereby given that, on March 31, 2026, MEMX LLC (“MEMX” or the “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposed rule change to amend the Exchange's fee schedule applicable to Members 3 pursuant to Exchange Rules 15.1(a) and (c). As is further described below, the Exchange proposes to: (i) modify the required criteria under Liquidity Provision Tier 4, and (ii) adopt a new Retail Sub-Dollar Liquidity Removal Tier. The Exchange proposes to implement the changes to the Fee Schedule pursuant to this proposal immediately. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose

The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Fee Schedule to: (i) modify the required criteria under Liquidity Provision Tier 4, and (ii) adopt a new Retail Sub-Dollar Liquidity Removal Tier, each as further described below.

The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the Exchange is only one of 18 registered equities exchanges, as well as a number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues, to which market participants may direct their order flow. Based on publicly available information, no single registered equities exchange currently has more than approximately 15% of the total market share of executed volume of equities trading. [4 ] Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly competitive market, no single equities exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of order flow, and the Exchange currently represents approximately 2% of the overall market share. [5 ] The Exchange in particular operates a “Maker-Taker” model whereby it provides rebates to Members that add liquidity to the Exchange and charges fees to Members that remove liquidity from the Exchange. The Fee Schedule sets forth the standard rebates and fees applied per share for orders that add and remove liquidity, respectively. Additionally, in response to the competitive environment, the Exchange also offers tiered pricing, which provides Members with opportunities to qualify for higher rebates or lower fees where certain volume criteria and thresholds are met. Tiered pricing provides an incremental incentive for Members to strive for higher tier levels, which provides increasingly higher benefits or discounts for satisfying increasingly more stringent criteria.

Liquidity Provision Tier 4

The Exchange currently provides a standard rebate of $0.0015 per share for executions of orders in securities priced at or above $1.00 per share that add displayed liquidity to the Exchange (such orders, “Added Displayed Volume”). [6 ] The Exchange also currently offers Liquidity Provision Tiers 1-5, among other volume-based tiers, under which a Member may receive an enhanced rebate for executions of Added Displayed Volume by achieving the corresponding required volume criteria for each such tier. The Exchange now proposes to modify the required criteria under Liquidity Provision Tier 4, as further described below.

The Exchange currently provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0028 per share for executions of Added Displayed Volume for Members that qualify for Liquidity Provision Tier 4 by achieving an ADAV 7 [8 ] that is equal to or greater than 0.09% of the TCV. [9 ] Now, the Exchange proposes to modify the required criteria such that a Member would qualify for Liquidity Provision Tier 4 by achieving an ADAV that is equal to or greater than 0.10% of the TCV. Thus, such proposed change would increase the ADAV % of TCV threshold but eliminate the Retail Order exclusion from the criteria, broadening the universe of executions which will be included in the Exchange's calculation of ADAV for purposes of qualifying for Liquidity Provision Tier 4. [10 ] The Exchange is not proposing to change the rebate provided under such tier.

The proposed change to Liquidity Provision Tier 4 is designed to encourage Members to maintain or increase their order flow, including in the form of orders that add liquidity on the Exchange in order to qualify for the ( printed page 18906) enhanced Liquidity Provision Tier 4 rebate, which may contribute to a more robust and well-balanced market ecosystem on the Exchange to the benefit of all Members.

Adoption of Retail Sub-Dollar Liquidity Removal Tier

The Exchange currently charges a standard fee of 0.28% of the total dollar value of the transaction for executions of orders in securities priced below $1.00 per share that remove liquidity from the Exchange, (such orders, “Removed Sub-Dollar Volume”), including Retail Orders. This standard fee is applicable to all such executions of Removed Sub-Dollar Volume (including those that qualify for any of the Exchange's existing volume tiers). Now, the Exchange proposes to adopt a volume-based tier, known as the Retail Sub-Dollar Liquidity Removal Tier, under which the Exchange will charge a reduced fee for executions of Retail Orders in securities priced below $1.00 per share that remove liquidity from the Exchange (such orders, “Removed Sub-Dollar Retail Volume”) for Members that achieve the volume criteria under such tier. Under the proposed Retail Sub-Dollar Liquidity Removal Tier 1, the Exchange will charge a reduced fee of 0.125% of the total dollar value of the transaction for executions of Removed Sub-Dollar Retail Volume for Members that qualify for such tier by achieving an ADAV in securities priced below $1.00 per share that is equal to or greater than 20,000,000 shares. [11 ]

The proposed Retail Sub-Dollar Liquidity Removal Tier is designed to attract liquidity to the Exchange in Sub-Dollar securities, thereby promoting price discovery and market quality on the Exchange in this category of securities. The Exchange notes the proposed Retail Sub-Dollar Liquidity Removal Tier is comparable to other volume-based incentives and discounts, which have been widely adopted by exchanges, including the Exchange. [12 ]

2. Statutory Basis

The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act, [13 ] in general, and with Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act, [14 ] in particular, in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using its facilities and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.

As discussed above, the Exchange operates in a highly fragmented and competitive market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive or incentives to be insufficient, and the Exchange represents only a small percentage of the overall market. The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and also recognized that current regulation of the market system “has been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors and listed companies.” [15 ]

The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can shift order flow or discontinue use of certain categories of products, in response to new or different pricing structures being introduced into the market. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain the Exchange's transaction fees and rebates, and market participants can readily trade on competing venues if they deem pricing levels at those other venues to be more favorable. The Exchange believes the proposal reflects a reasonable and competitive pricing structure designed to incentivize market participants to direct additional order flow, including displayed, liquidity-adding orders to the Exchange, both which the Exchange believes would promote price discovery and enhance liquidity and market quality on the Exchange to the benefit of all Members and market participants.

The Exchange notes that volume and quoting-based incentives (such as tiers) have been widely adopted by exchanges, including the Exchange, and are reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because they are open to all members on an equal basis and provide additional benefits that are reasonably related to the value of an exchange's market quality associated with higher levels of market activity, such as higher levels of liquidity provision and/or growth patterns, and the introduction of higher volumes of orders into the price and volume discovery process. The Exchange believes that Liquidity Provision Tier 4, as modified by the proposed changes to the required criteria under such tier, is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory, as such tier will continue to provide Members with an incremental incentive to achieve certain volume thresholds on the Exchange, is available to all Members on an equal basis, and, as described above, is designed to encourage Members to maintain or increase their order flow, including in the form of displayed, liquidity-adding orders to the Exchange, thereby contributing to a deeper, more liquid and well balanced market ecosystem on the Exchange to the benefit of all Members and market participants.

The Exchange also believes that such tier reflects a reasonable and equitable allocation of fees and rebates, as the Exchange believes that, after giving effect to the changes proposed herein, the enhanced rebate for executions of Added Displayed Volume under such tier is commensurate with the corresponding required criteria under the tier and is reasonably related to the market quality benefits that the tier is designed to achieve, as described above. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed new Retail Sub-Dollar Liquidity Removal Tier is reasonable, in that it is comparable to pricing incentives adopted by other exchanges that charge a reduced fee for executions of Removed Sub-Dollar Retail Volume for firms that achieve a specified volume threshold. [16 ]

For the reasons discussed above, the Exchange submits that the proposal satisfies the requirements of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act [17 ] in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using its facilities and is not designed to unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. As described more fully below in the Exchange's statement regarding ( printed page 18907) the burden on competition, the Exchange believes that its transaction pricing is subject to significant competitive forces, and that the proposed rebates described herein are appropriate to address such forces.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

The Exchange does not believe that the proposal will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the proposal is intended to incentivize market participants to direct additional order flow to the Exchange, thereby enhancing liquidity and market quality on the Exchange to the benefit of all Members and market participants. As a result, the Exchange believes the proposal would enhance its competitiveness as a market that attracts actionable orders, thereby making it a more desirable destination venue for its customers. For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering competition among orders, which promotes “more efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.” [18 ]

Intramarket Competition

As discussed above, the Exchange believes that the proposal would incentivize Members to submit additional order flow, including displayed, liquidity-adding orders to the Exchange, in both Retail and non-Retail orders, in Sub-Dollar securities and securities priced at or above $1.00 per share, thereby enhancing liquidity and market quality on the Exchange to the benefit of all Members, as well as enhancing the attractiveness of the Exchange as a trading venue, which the Exchange believes, in turn, would continue to encourage market participants to direct additional order flow to the Exchange. Greater liquidity benefits all Members by providing more trading opportunities and encourages Members to send additional orders to the Exchange, thereby contributing to robust levels of liquidity, which benefits all market participants.

The opportunity to qualify for the proposed new criteria under the Liquidity Provision Tier 4 and the new Retail Sub-Dollar Liquidity Removal Tier 1, and thus receive the corresponding rebate for executions of Added Displayed Volume, and/or reduced fee for executions of Removed Retail Sub-Dollar Volume, as applicable, would be available to all Members that meet the associated volume requirements in any month. As described above, the Exchange believes that, after giving effect to the changes proposed herein, the required criteria under each of the tiers described above is commensurate with the corresponding enhanced rebate/reduced fee under each such tier and is reasonably related to the enhanced liquidity and market quality that each such tier is designed to promote.

For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes the proposed changes would not impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

Intermarket Competition

As noted above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive or incentives to be insufficient. Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on and direct their order flow to, including 17 other equities exchanges and numerous alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues. As noted above, no single registered equities exchange currently has more than approximately 15% of the total market share of executed volume of equities trading. Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly competitive market, no single equities exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of order flow. Moreover, the Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can shift order flow or reduce use of certain categories of products, in response to new or different pricing structures being introduced into the market. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain the Exchange's transaction fees and rebates, including with respect to Added Displayed Volume and Removed Sub-Dollar Retail Volume and market participants can readily choose to send their orders to other exchange and off-exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those other venues to be more favorable. As described above, the proposed changes represent a competitive proposal through which the Exchange is seeking to generate additional revenue with respect to its transaction pricing and to encourage the submission of additional order flow to the Exchange through volume and quoting-based tiers, which have been widely adopted by exchanges, including the Exchange. Accordingly, the Exchange believes the proposal would not burden, but rather promote, intermarket competition by enabling it to better compete with other exchanges that offer similar pricing incentives to market participants.

Additionally, the Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the market system “has been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors and listed companies.” [19 ] The fact that this market is competitive has also long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. SEC, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: “[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained,[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for execution'; [and] no exchange can afford to take its market share percentages for granted' becauseno exchange possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker dealers'. . . .”. [20 ] Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its proposed pricing changes impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action

The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act [21 ] and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) [22 ] thereunder.

( printed page 18908) At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

• Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/​rules/​sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include file number SR-MEMX-2026-09 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

• Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to file number SR-MEMX-2026-09. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/​rules/​sro.shtml). Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR-MEMX-2026-09 and should be submitted on or before May 4, 2026.

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. [23 ]

Sherry R. Haywood,

Assistant Secretary.

Footnotes

1. 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).

Back to Citation 2. 17 CFR 240.19b-4.

Back to Citation 3.

                     
                    See 
                     Exchange Rule 1.5(p).

Back to Citation 4.

                     Market share percentage calculated as of March 30, 2026. The Exchange receives and processes data made available through consolidated data feeds (*i.e.,* CTS and UTDF).

Back to Citation 5. Id.

Back to Citation 6.

                     The base rebate for executions of Added Displayed Volume is referred to by the Exchange on the Fee Schedule under the existing description “Added displayed volume” with a Fee Code of “B”, “D” or “J”, as applicable, on execution reports.

Back to Citation 7.

                     As set forth on the Fee Schedule, “ADAV” means the average daily added volume calculated as the number of shares added per day, which is calculated on a monthly basis.

Back to Citation 8.

                     A “Retail Order” means an agency or riskless principal order that meets the criteria of FINRA Rule 5320.03 that originates from a natural person and is submitted to the Exchange by a Retail Member Organization (“RMO”), provided that no change is made to the terms of the order with respect to price or side of market and the order does not originate from a trading algorithm or any other computerized methodology. 
                    See 
                     Exchange Rule 11.21(a).

Back to Citation 9.

                     As set forth on the Fee Schedule, “TCV” means total consolidated volume calculated as the volume reported by all exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a consolidated transaction reporting plan for the month for which the fees apply.

Back to Citation 10.

                     The pricing for Liquidity Provision Tier 4 is referred to by the Exchange on the Fee Schedule under the existing description, “Added displayed volume, Liquidity Provision Tier 4” with a Fee Code of “B4”, “D4”, or “J4”, as applicable, to be provided by the Exchange on the monthly invoices provided to Members.

Back to Citation 11.

                     The pricing for the proposed new Sub-Dollar Retail Liquidity Removal Tier is referred to by the Exchange on the Fee Schedule under the new description “Sub-Dollar Retail Liquidity Removal Tier 1” with a Fee Code of “Rr1B” on monthly invoices provided to Members.

Back to Citation 12. See, e.g., the NYSE Arca Equities Fees and Charges (available at https://www.nyse.com/​publicdocs/​nyse/​markets/​nyse-arca/​NYSE​Arca​Marketplace_​Fees.pdf), which shows a Sub-Dollar Retail Day Remove Tier, whereby members of NYSE Arca are charged a reduced fee of 0.20% of the total dollar value for executions of securities priced below $1.00 per share for firms that qualify for such tier by achieving certain specified volume thresholds.

Back to Citation 13. 15 U.S.C. 78f.

Back to Citation 14. 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).

Back to Citation 15.

                     Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), [70 FR 37496](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/70-FR-37496), [37499](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/70-FR-37499) (June 29, 2005).

Back to Citation 16. See supra note 12.

Back to Citation 17. 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).

Back to Citation 18. See supra note 15.

Back to Citation 19. Id.

Back to Citation 20. NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2006-21)).

Back to Citation 21. 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).

Back to Citation 22. 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).

Back to Citation 23. 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

Back to Citation [FR Doc. 2026-07045 Filed 4-10-26; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

Published Document: 2026-07045 (91 FR 18905)