Insurance Producer License Revoked for Consent Violations
Summary
MI DIFS issued an Order Accepting Stipulation revoking Samuel Christmas's insurance producer license (Case No. 25-18214). The revocation stems from DIFS allegations that Christmas violated MCL 500.2003(1) by submitting enrollment documents without the knowledge or consent of insureds—a deceptive practice under MCL 500.2018. Christmas admitted the violations and agreed to the revocation as the sole regulatory penalty, with the license revoked effective immediately.
What changed
DIFS accepted a stipulation revoking Samuel Christmas's insurance producer license after finding he submitted enrollment and enrollment change documents without the knowledge or consent of insureds, violating MCL 500.2003(1) and constituting unfair competition and deceptive practices under MCL 500.2018. The revocation is effective immediately, and DIFS retains jurisdiction to pursue additional proceedings if Christmas fails to comply with the stipulated order terms.
Insurance producers and agencies operating in Michigan must ensure robust consent verification procedures for all enrollment transactions. Any undocumented or non-consented enrollment changes could expose producers to similar enforcement actions including license revocation. DIFS has signaled continued vigilance in monitoring enrollment practices and will pursue sanctions under Sections 1239(1)(f), (g), (h) and 1239(2)(e) of the Code against those engaging in deceptive enrollment practices.
What to do next
- Cease all insurance producer activities under the revoked license immediately
- Review enrollment documentation practices to ensure all changes have documented consent
- Report any similar practices to compliance leadership for remediation
Penalties
Insurance producer license revoked; continued violation of the order may result in additional DIFS proceedings
Archived snapshot
Apr 8, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of the Department of Insurance and Financial Services In the matter of: Samuel Christmas Enforcement Case No. 25-18214 System ID No. 0082669 Respondent. ____________________/ Issued and entered On April __, 2026 By Joseph A. Garcia Senior Deputy Director and General Counsel ORDER ACCEPTING STIPULATION Based upon the Stipulation to Entry of Order and the files and records of the Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) in this matter, the Senior Deputy Director finds and concludes that:
The Senior Deputy Director has jurisdiction and authority to adopt and issue this Order Accepting
Stipulation in this proceeding pursuant to the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act of 1969 (APA), MCL 24.201 et seq., and the Michigan Insurance Code of 1956 (Code), MCL 500.100 et seq.All required notices have been issued in this case, and the notices and service thereof were
appropriate and lawful in all respects.Acceptance of the Stipulation to Entry of Order is reasonable and in the public interest.
All applicable provisions of the APA have been either satisfied or waived by all Parties.
On or about April 16, 2025, DIFS served a Notice of Opportunity to Show Compliance (NOSC) on
Respondent. In the NOSC, DIFS asserts that Respondent violated Section 2003(1) of the Code, MCL 500.2003(1), by engaging in practices that constitute an unfair method of competition and/or deceptive acts or practices in the business of insurance as defined by MCL 500.2018, by submitting enrollment and/or change in enrollment documents without the knowledge or consent of the insured. The NOSC further alleged that Respondent provided justification for sanctions pursuant to Section 1239(1)(f), (1)(g), (1)(h), and Section 1239(2)(e) of the Code, MCL 500.1239(1)(f), (1)(g), (1)(h), and (2)(e).Respondent admits to the allegations contained in the NOSC and agrees to the revocation of his
insurance producer license as the sole regulatory penalty for said violations.
Order Accepting Stipulation Enforcement Case No. 25-18214 Samuel Christmas Page 2 of 2
Now therefore, based upon the Stipulation to Entry of Order and the facts surrounding this case, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
All agreements contained in the Stipulation to Entry of Order are accepted and adopted in their
entirety.Respondent shall comply with all terms agreed to in the Stipulation to Entry of Order. A failure to
comply with a term in the Stipulation shall be deemed a violation of this Order.Respondent's insurance producer license is hereby REVOKED, effective immediately.
The Senior Deputy Director retains jurisdiction over the matters contained herein and has the
authority to issue such further order(s) as shall be deemed just, necessary, and appropriate in accordance with the Michigan Insurance Code. Failure to abide by the terms and provisions of the Stipulation to Entry of Order and this Order may result in the commencement of additional proceedings.
_______________________________________ Joseph A. Garcia Senior Deputy Director and General Counsel
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of the Department of Insurance and Financial Services In the matter of: Samuel Christmas Enforcement Case No. 25-18214 System ID No. 0082669 Respondent. _______________________/ STIPULATION TO ENTRY OF ORDER Samuel Christmas (Respondent) stipulates to the following:
Respondent has had the opportunity to have this Order Accepting Stipulation and Stipulation to Entry
of Order (collectively, "Consent Order") reviewed by legal counsel.Respondent has reviewed and voluntarily consented to the entry of the Order Accepting Stipulation
that will be entered in this enforcement case and understands and agrees that the findings contained in this Order may be taken as true in this or any other DIFS proceeding.This enforcement proceeding is currently before Administrative Law Judge David B. Marmon in
Docket No. 25-029208. An evidentiary hearing was scheduled for February 9, 2026. Respondent has elected to waive his right to hearing and resolve this enforcement proceeding through this Consent Order.Respondent understands that Respondent had a right to a hearing before an administrative law
judge, at which DIFS would be required to prove the charges set forth by presentation of evidence and legal authority and at which Respondent would be entitled to appear, to cross-examine all witnesses presented by DIFS, and to present such testimony or other evidence or legal authority deemed appropriate as a defense to said charges. Respondent understands and intends that by agreeing to the Consent Order, Respondent is knowingly and voluntarily waiving Respondent's right, pursuant to the Michigan Insurance Code of 1956 (Code), MCL 500.100 et seq., the rules promulgated thereto, and the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), MCL 24.201 et seq., to a hearing before Administrative Law Judge David B. Marmon.Respondent agrees that all parties have complied with the procedural requirements of the APA and
the Code.On or about April 16, 2025, DIFS served a Notice of Opportunity to Show Compliance (NOSC) on
Respondent. In the NOSC, DIFS asserts that Respondent violated Section 2003(1) of the Code, MCL 500.2003(1), by engaging in practices that constitute an unfair method of competition and/or deceptive acts or practices in the business of insurance as defined by MCL 500.2018, by submitting
Stipulation to Entry of Order Enforcement Case No. 25-18214 Samuel Christmas Page 2 of 2
enrollment and/or change in enrollment documents without the knowledge or consent of the insured. The NOSC further alleged that Respondent provided justification for sanctions pursuant to Section 1239(1)(f), (1)(g), (1)(h), and Section 1239(2)(e) of the Code, MCL 500.1239(1)(f), (1)(g), (1)(h), and (2)(e).
Respondent admits to the violations alleged in the NOSC. Respondent agrees to the terms of this
Stipulation and the revocation of his insurance producer license in order to avoid potential civil fines and the added cost of litigation.Respondent agrees that DIFS will revoke his insurance producer license immediately upon the
execution of the Order Accepting Stipulation. Respondent agrees to cease and desist from all activity that would require an insurance producer license.Respondent understands that this Stipulation to Entry of Order will be presented to the Senior Deputy
Director for approval and that the Senior Deputy Director may or may not approve and adopt it.Respondent further agrees that the Senior Deputy Director has jurisdiction and authority to approve
and adopt this Stipulation to Entry of Order.Respondent waives any objection to the Director deciding the case following a Michigan Office of
Administrative Hearings and Rules hearing in the event that the Stipulation to Entry of Order is not approved.
__________________________________ _____________________ Samuel Christmas Date Respondent
DIFS Staff approve this Stipulation and recommend that the Senior Deputy Director accept it and issue an Order Accepting Stipulation.
__________________________________ _____________________ Diego R. Avila (P72657) Date DIFS Staff Attorney
4-7-20264-6-2026Samuel Christmas w/permission granted 4-6-2026
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for MI DIFS Directors Orders
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from MI DIFS.
The plain-English summary, classification, and "what to do next" steps are AI-generated from the original text. Cite the source document, not the AI analysis.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when MI DIFS Directors Orders publishes new changes.