FDIC Proposes GENIUS Act Framework for Payment Stablecoin Issuers
Summary
The FDIC announced a proposed rule implementing GENIUS Act requirements for FDIC-supervised permitted payment stablecoin issuers (PPSIs). The rule would establish prudential requirements including 1:1 reserve backing with eligible highly liquid assets, a $5 million minimum capital requirement during the first three years, a 12-month operational expense backstop, prohibitions on interest payments to stablecoin holders, and segregation requirements for custodians providing stablecoin safekeeping services. Comments on the proposed rule must be submitted by June 9.
What changed
The FDIC proposes a comprehensive prudential framework for payment stablecoin issuers supervised by the agency, implementing key GENIUS Act requirements. The rule would require PPSIs to maintain reserves at a 1:1 ratio with eligible highly liquid assets, cap single-institution holdings at 40% of reserves, and prohibit pledging or rehypothecating reserve assets. Minimum capital of $5 million would be required during the first three years of operations, along with a 12-month operational backstop in liquid assets separate from reserves. The rule also clarifies that deposit insurance applies to stablecoin reserves as corporate deposits of the issuer, not on a pass-through basis to stablecoin holders.\n\nAffected parties including stablecoin issuers and custodians providing stablecoin-related services should evaluate whether their current practices align with the proposed requirements and consider submitting comments by the June 9 deadline. The FDIC noted alignment with the OCC's March 2 proposed rule and requested comment on further harmonization among primary federal payment stablecoin regulators.
What to do next
- Stablecoin issuers should review proposed requirements for capital, reserves, and liquidity
- Custodians providing stablecoin services should assess segregation requirements
- Submit comments by June 9
Archived snapshot
Apr 13, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
April 13, 2026
FDIC proposes GENIUS Act rule establishing framework for FDIC-supervised payment stablecoin issuers
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed
On April 7, the FDIC announced a proposed rule implementing certain requirements and standards promulgated by the GENIUS Act (covered by InfoBytes here). The rule would establish a prudential framework for FDIC-supervised permitted payment stablecoin issuers (PPSIs), including requirements related to reserve assets, redemption, capital, liquidity, and risk management. The proposed rule would also establish requirements for FDIC-supervised institutions that provide payment stablecoin-related custodial and safekeeping services.
Among other things, the proposed rule would:
- Limit PPSIs to issuing, redeeming, and managing reserves related to payment stablecoins and providing limited custodial and safekeeping services
- Require PPSIs to maintain reserves fully backing outstanding payment stablecoins on at least a one-to-one basis with eligible highly liquid assets (as defined in the NPRM), with no more than 40 percent held with a single financial institution, and prohibit PPSIs from pledging, rehypothecating or reusing such assets, with narrow exceptions
- Require PPSIs to maintain a minimum of $5 million in capital during the first three years, along with an operational backstop equal to 12 months of total expenses held in liquid assets separate from reserves
- Prohibit PPSIs from paying interest or yield to stablecoin holders for the holding, use or retention of payment stablecoins
Prohibit PPSIs from extending credit to customers to purchase payment stablecoins
Additionally, the proposed rule would:Require custodians providing stablecoin-related safekeeping services to separately account for and segregate customer assets from their own
Clarify that deposits held as reserves backing payment stablecoins are insured as corporate deposits of the issuer, not on a pass-through basis to stablecoin holders — which FDIC Chairman Hill previewed in March 11 remarks (covered here) — and that tokenized deposits meeting the statutory definition of “deposit” under the FDI Act are treated no differently than other deposits for federal deposit insurance purposes
Propose amendments to the FDIC’s bank capital rule to ensure that an IDI with a consolidated PPSI subsidiary is not required to hold regulatory capital with respect to that subsidiary in excess of the capital the PPSI subsidiary must maintain under the GENIUS Act
The FDIC noted it aimed to align the proposal with the OCC’s March 2 proposed rule (covered by this Orrick Insight here), and requested comment on the extent to which the primary federal payment stablecoin regulators should further align in their final rules. The proposal is the FDIC’s second rulemaking under the GENIUS Act, the first of which InfoBytes covered here. Comments on the proposed rule must be submitted by June 9.
Related Posts
- OCC and FDIC finalize rules eliminating reputation risk from supervision
- FDIC releases monthly list of CRA compliance examinations for April
- FDIC publishes February enforcement actions
Latest Posts
- FDIC proposes GENIUS Act rule establishing framework for FDIC-supervised payment stablecoin issuers
- CFTC obtains $500K penalty against digital asset exchange operator for alleged registration violations See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.
©
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Written by:
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Contact + Follow more less
PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA
- ✔ Increased readership
- ✔ Actionable analytics
- ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra
Published In:
Banking Sector + Follow Banks + Follow Comment Period + Follow Digital Assets + Follow FDIC + Follow FinTech + Follow Liquidity + Follow Payment Systems + Follow Proposed Rules + Follow Regulatory Oversight + Follow Regulatory Requirements + Follow Risk Management + Follow Stablecoins + Follow The GENIUS Act + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow Insurance + Follow Science, Computers & Technology + Follow more less
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:
"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for JD Supra Finance & Banking
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Orrick.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when JD Supra Finance & Banking publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.