DOL Proposed Safe Harbor for Selecting Plan Investment Alternatives
Summary
The Department of Labor has issued a proposed rule establishing a process-based safe harbor for ERISA plan fiduciaries selecting 401(k) investment alternatives. The proposal outlines six non-exhaustive factors—performance, fees, liquidity, valuation, performance benchmarks, and complexity—that fiduciaries must consider when evaluating investment options. The rule is open for public comment through June 1, 2026.
What changed
The DOL proposed rule establishes a process-based safe harbor for ERISA plan fiduciaries selecting designated investment alternatives for individual account plans such as 401(k) plans. The six factors include: performance (risk-adjusted expected returns), fees, liquidity, valuation adequacy, performance benchmarks, and complexity considerations. The safe harbor is non-exhaustive and does not alter fiduciary responsibility to provide prudent investment alternatives.
Plan sponsors, plan administrators, and investment committees should monitor this proposal as it may affect how investment menus are evaluated and documented. Fiduciaries selecting alternative asset investments for 401(k) plans will need to ensure their selection processes align with these factors if the rule is finalized.
What to do next
- Monitor for updates
- Submit comments by June 1, 2026
- Review investment selection processes against the six-factor framework
Archived snapshot
Apr 9, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
April 8, 2026
DOL Proposed Safe Harbor for Selecting Plan Investment Alternatives
Haynes Boone + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed As we previously reported here, the DOL recently issued a proposed rule (the “ Proposed Rule ”) which clarifies, and provides a safe harbor for, a plan fiduciary’s compliance with ERISA’s duty of prudence when selecting investment alternatives (including alternative asset investments) for the investment menu for an individual account plan (e.g., a 401(k) plan). The Proposed Rule establishes a process-based safe harbor by identifying the following six non-exhaustive factors for a plan fiduciary to consider and evaluate when selecting plan investments:
1. Performance: Fiduciaries must appropriately consider a reasonable number of similar investment alternatives and determine that the risk-adjusted expected returns of the investment alternative, over an appropriate time horizon and net of fees, further the purposes of the plan.
2. Fees: Investment fees should be reviewed in consideration of risk-adjusted expected returns and any other value the investment alternative brings to furthering the purposes of the plan.
3. Liquidity: Investment alternatives should be evaluated to determine if they will have sufficient liquidity to meet the plan’s anticipated needs at the plan and participant levels.
4. Valuation: Fiduciaries must appropriately consider and determine that the investment alternative has adopted adequate measures to ensure that the investment alternative is capable of being timely and accurately valued in accordance with the needs of the plan.
5. Performance Benchmarks: The selected investment alternatives should be properly measured against a “meaningful benchmark.” The Proposed Rule defines “meaningful benchmark” as “an investment, strategy, index, or other comparator that has similar mandates, strategies, objectives, and risks to the designated investment alternative.”
6. Complexity: Fiduciaries should consider whether they have the appropriate knowledge and skills to comprehend the investment alternative sufficiently under ERISA or whether they should seek assistance from an investment professional.
The Proposed Rule is available here and is subject to a 60-day comment period through June 1, 2026. As a reminder, the Proposed Rule does not alter a plan fiduciary’s responsibility to provide prudent investment alternatives to the plan’s participants and beneficiaries in accordance with ERISA. We will continue to monitor developments regarding the status of this rule.
[View source.]
Latest Posts
- DOL Proposed Safe Harbor for Selecting Plan Investment Alternatives
- FDA Grants Limited Enforcement Discretion for CBD in Dietary Supplements
- Stabilizing Foreign Investment: China’s Upgraded Industry Investment Guide
- Supreme Court Holds Strict Scrutiny Applies to Colorado Conversion Therapy Law
- EPA Proposes Rollback of Chemical Accident Prevention Rules: What RMP-Regulated Facilities Must Know See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.
©
Haynes Boone
Written by:
Haynes Boone Contact + Follow more less
PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA
- ✔ Increased readership
- ✔ Actionable analytics
- ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra
Published In:
401k + Follow Benefit Plan Sponsors + Follow Defined Contribution Plans + Follow Department of Labor (DOL) + Follow Employee Benefits + Follow Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) + Follow Fiduciary Duty + Follow Proposed Rules + Follow Retirement Plan + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow Labor & Employment + Follow more less
Haynes Boone on:
"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for JD Supra Finance & Banking
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Haynes Boone.
The plain-English summary, classification, and "what to do next" steps are AI-generated from the original text. Cite the source document, not the AI analysis.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when JD Supra Finance & Banking publishes new changes.