Court vacates FinCEN real estate reporting rule
Summary
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas vacated FinCEN's residential real estate reporting rule in Flowers Title Companies v. Bessent, finding the agency exceeded its statutory authority under the Bank Secrecy Act. The rule, which required title insurance agents, escrow agents, and attorneys to report non-financed residential transfers to entities or trusts, was effective since December 1, 2025 but had no minimum dollar threshold. The court found FinCEN's reliance on prior geographic targeting order statistics unpersuasive.
What changed
On March 19, 2026, the court in Flowers Title Companies v. Bessent granted summary judgment under the APA, vacating FinCEN's August 2024 rule that required reporting of any non-financed residential real estate transfers to entities or trusts without a minimum dollar threshold. The court held that neither the suspicious transaction report requirement nor the authority to mandate compliance procedures permitted such a broad reporting mandate, finding FinCEN's justification 'vague, conclusory, and unpersuasive.' The rule had required closing agents to report detailed information on transferees, beneficial owners, transferors, property, and payment methods under a cascading approach for determining reporting responsibility.
Title insurance agents, escrow agents, attorneys, and other parties previously subject to this reporting requirement should immediately cease compliance activities, as the rule is now void nationwide with pre-rule status quo restored. The decision did not address constitutional claims also raised in the case, leaving potential alternative legal theories unexamined.
What to do next
- Discontinue reporting activities for non-financed residential real estate transfers
- Update internal compliance procedures to remove the vacated rule requirements
- Review pending transactions to determine whether any interim obligations existed
Source document (simplified)
March 30, 2026
District court vacates FinCEN’s residential real estate reporting rule
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed
On March 19, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas vacated a previously effective final rule issued by FinCEN requiring reporting of any non-financed residential real estate transfers to entities or trusts. The court held that the rule exceeded FinCEN’s statutory authority under the Bank Secrecy Act, finding that neither provision cited by the agency — a requirement for suspicious transaction reports and authority to mandate institutions maintain procedures for compliance — permitted such a broad reporting mandate. The court ruled FinCEN failed to justify treating all non-financed transfers as categorically suspicious, criticizing its reliance on prior geographic targeting order (GTO) statistics and law enforcement actions as “vague, conclusory, and unpersuasive.”
The rule, finalized in August 2024 and effective since December 1, 2025, applied nationwide with no minimum dollar threshold, though with some exceptions. It required individuals involved in closings or settlements, such as title insurance agents, escrow agents, or attorneys, to report detailed information about the reporting person, transferees, beneficial owners, transferors, property, and payment methods for covered transactions. The regulation outlined a “cascading approach” for determining the person who must report the transactions and allowed the reporting function to be designated by written agreements between eligible parties. In granting summary judgment under the APA, the court contrasted the rule with FinCEN’s earlier GTOs that were geographically and temporally limited. The court found vacatur appropriate due to both the “seriousness of deficiencies” and minimal disruption in returning to the pre-rule status quo. It did not address alternative constitutional claims raised in the case.
[View source.]
Related Posts
- FinCEN grants exemptive relief from Minnesota geographic targeting order
- Treasury’s OIG reports on FinCEN BSA data management compliance
- FinCEN launches website for whistleblower tips on fraud and BSA/AML violations
Latest Posts
- Treasury to assume federal student loan default collections under new interagency agreement
- CFPB seeks comment on reinstating mortgage advertising and land sales information collections See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.
©
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Written by:
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Contact + Follow more less
PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA
- ✔ Increased readership
- ✔ Actionable analytics
- ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra
Published In:
Administrative Procedure Act + Follow Anti-Money Laundering + Follow Bank Secrecy Act + Follow Beneficial Owner + Follow Federal Court Litigation + Follow FinCEN + Follow Real Estate Transactions + Follow Regulatory Authority + Follow Reporting Requirements + Follow Residential Real Estate Market + Follow Rulemaking Process + Follow Statutory Interpretation + Follow Summary Judgment + Follow Vacatur + Follow Administrative Agency + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow Residential Real Estate + Follow more less
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:
"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide
Named provisions
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Banking & Finance alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when JD Supra Finance & Banking publishes new changes.