Changeflow GovPing Banking & Finance ABA Supports Executive Orders Rolling Back Mort...
Routine Notice Added Final

ABA Supports Executive Orders Rolling Back Mortgage Regulations

Favicon for bankingjournal.aba.com ABA Banking Journal Compliance
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

The American Bankers Association announced support for two executive orders directing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank regulators to reduce mortgage regulatory burdens, promote lender competition, lower borrowing costs, and better tailor rules for community banks. Separately, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac announced eased property insurance requirements in response to rising insurance costs, accepting actual cash value coverage on roofs for single-family homes and condominiums. ABA had previously joined MBA and Housing Policy Council in urging FHFA to rescind difficult property insurance requirements introduced earlier in 2024.

Published by ABA on bankingjournal.aba.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

ABA expressed support for two executive orders directing federal regulators to roll back or better tailor mortgage regulations to expand credit access and promote housing construction. The orders target the ability-to-repay and qualified mortgage framework, TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure requirements, enhanced servicing standards, and expanded HMDA reporting as areas imposing substantial compliance costs. ABA states compliance costs have grown faster than mortgage revenues at smaller institutions, contributing to bank exits from mortgage lending. Separately, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will now accept actual cash value coverage on roofs for single-family homes and condos in response to rising insurance prices, though replacement cost value coverage remains required for the rest of the structure.

Mortgage lenders and community banks should monitor for forthcoming regulatory reviews from CFPB and bank regulators as agencies begin implementing the executive order directives. Banks currently evaluating mortgage lending participation or compliance costs should note the regulatory direction as agencies conduct reviews. Financial institutions should also note the updated insurance standards from Fannie and Freddie when evaluating property collateral requirements.

Archived snapshot

Apr 17, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

No Result View All Result

April 16, 2026 Reading Time: 3 mins read By Rod Alba

The American Bankers Association continues its advocacy efforts on multiple issues that affect mortgage lending and homeownership. Here is a rundown of important recent news and activities:

Bankers support mortgage reforms

The American Bankers Association recently welcomed two new executive orders from the White House directing federal regulators to roll back or better tailor mortgage regulations to expand access to credit and promote new housing construction.

The orders instruct the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank regulators to reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens, promote competition among mortgage lenders, lower borrowing costs and better tailor mortgage rules for community banks. The mortgage-focused order appropriately recognizes that two decades of accumulated statutory and regulatory changes have driven up mortgage costs by sharply increasing the compliance burden associated with origination and servicing. These costs have not only raised prices for borrowers but have also contributed to a significant decline in bank participation in mortgage lending.

ABA strongly agrees with the executive orders’ assessment and will actively support the reviews and regulatory processes it directs. For years, ABA has cautioned that the post‑crisis expansion of highly complex and prescriptive rules — including the ability-to-repay and qualified mortgage framework, TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure requirements, enhanced servicing standards, and expanded Home Mortgage Disclosure Act reporting — has imposed substantial compliance and legal costs on all banks.

Community banks, in particular, often lack the scale and resources needed to absorb ongoing legal, audit and compliance expenses. ABA member banks report that compliance costs have generally grown faster than mortgage revenues at smaller institutions, forcing many banks to scale back or exit mortgage lending altogether.

ABA supports streamlining mortgage regulations and ensuring that they identify rules that impose unnecessary costs, risks and legal uncertainty without corresponding consumer benefit. The association also supports the cost-reducing principles articulated in the order and will advocate that federal agencies move promptly with targeted reviews to ensure the mortgage regulatory framework is understandable, fair, efficient and applied consistently across all communities.

Fannie, Freddie ease certain property insurance requirements

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are rolling back certain property insurance requirements for condominiums and single-family homes in response to “skyrocketing” insurance prices, the Federal Housing Finance Agency announced. Fannie and Freddie will now accept actual cash value coverage on roofs for single-family homes and condos, according to the FHFA. The rest of the house must have replacement cost value coverage, which usually has higher premiums but more extensive coverage.

ABA, in conjunction with Mortgage Bankers Association and Housing Policy Council, sent a joint letter to the Federal Housing Finance Agency in November 2024. In the letter, the associations urged FHFA to direct Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to rescind difficult property insurance requirements introduced earlier that year. ABA argued that the new standards — specifically those regarding the verification of replacement cost value — created “significant operational, legal, and consumer protection challenges.”

In response to industry feedback and evolving market conditions, FHFA and the GSEs announced the following changes to property insurance requirements:

  • Retracting the 2024 requirement for verifying a replacement cost value (a number) year over year and returning closer to the pre-2024 requirements. Under this new update, for new policies, servicers must confirm that insurer rating, deductibles and perils meet the selling guide requirements and confirm that replacement cost coverage is in place. The same requirements apply to renewal policies and must be done at least annually.
  • Allowing actual cash value policies for roofs.
  • Clarifications around the process servicers must take when initial evidence is insufficient to confirm replacement cost requirements.
  • Clarifications around written procedures describing how servicers will meet the monitoring requirements, including processes for detecting coverage decreases and confirming compliance replacement cost coverage.
  • New requirement that, at least annually, servicers must send the borrower a reminder that the borrower is responsible for maintaining insurance on the property and should contact their insurance provider to review coverage, which can be combined with another communication.
  • Emphasizing that servicers must obtain lender-placed property insurance when notified that coverage is cancelled, non-renewed or lapsed. ABA outlines national blueprint for fighting fraud.

ABA submitted a statement ahead of a meeting of the congressional Joint Economic Committee highlighting the many ways banks protect their customers from fraud and scams and pointing out where more support is needed — particularly from telecommunications and social media companies — in the fight against fraud.

CFPB reforms could come this year

House Financial Services Committee Chairman French Hill (R-Ark.) signaled that Republicans in the House are looking to put forth a series of bills to address structural reform of the CFPB. Hill also stated that he expects the 1071 final rule and initiation of a 1033 rulemaking by midyear.

ABA offers feedback on VA mortgage policy

A proposal for implementing a new “partial claim attestation” policy to help veterans and servicemembers pay their mortgages needs further revision in order to have the desired effect, ABA told the Department of Veterans Affairs. ABA offered several recommendations for the department to consider.

Rod Alba is ABA’s SVP of real estate finance.

Tags: GSEs Homeownership mortgage servicing Share Tweet Pin

Related Posts

Mortgage rates dip

Economy April 16, 2026 The rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was 6.3% this week. The rate for a 15-year fixed-rate mortgage was 5.65%.

NAHB: Homebuilder confidence declines in April

Economy April 15, 2026 Homebuilder confidence in the market for newly built single-family homes fell four points to 34 in April, according to the NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index.

ABA DataBank: Existing home sales fell 3.6% in March

Economy April 13, 2026 The ABA Office of the Chief Economist sees the decline in existing home sales as driven by continued affordability concerns.

Mortgage rates inch down

Economy April 9, 2026 The rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was 6.37% this week. The rate for a 15-year fixed-rate mortgage was 5.74%.

Report: More than 10,000 veterans have lost homes since VA changes

Mortgage April 2, 2026 More than 10,000 veterans have lost their homes since the Department of Veterans Affairs ended a program that allowed them to delay paying their mortgages because of financial hardship, according to a news report.

Mortgage rates rise

Economy April 2, 2026 The rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was 6.46% this week. The rate for a 15-year fixed-rate mortgage was 5.77%.

NEWSBYTES

Industrial production fell in March

April 16, 2026

Mortgage rates dip

April 16, 2026

Study: Weak fundamentals primary cause of bank failures

April 16, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

How leading banks are enhancing customer engagement through financial data insights

April 10, 2026

Check Fraud Is Outpacing Legacy Controls. What Banks Should Evaluate Now.

April 1, 2026

How top agricultural lenders are approaching AI, automation and innovation in 2026

March 2, 2026

Top 7 FP&A Trends in Banking for 2026

March 1, 2026

PODCASTS

Podcast: Capitalizing on opportunities to serve high-net-worth clients

April 9, 2026

Podcast: Are credit union commercial loans risky business?

March 30, 2026

Podcast: Risk and strategy in sponsor banking

March 19, 2026
American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result View All Result

Get daily alerts for ABA Banking Journal Compliance

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from ABA.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
ABA
Published
April 16th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Banks Consumers Mortgage lenders
Industry sector
5221 Commercial Banking
Activity scope
Mortgage lending Regulatory advocacy Housing finance
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Banking
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Consumer Finance Real Estate

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when ABA Banking Journal Compliance publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!