Proposed Rule: Marketing Order for California Almonds - Borrowing Authority
Summary
The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has proposed a rule to amend Marketing Order No. 981, which governs the handling of California almonds. The proposed amendment would grant the Almond Board of California the authority to borrow funds from commercial lending institutions. The public comment period for this proposed rule closes on May 19, 2026.
What changed
The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is proposing an amendment to Marketing Order No. 981, which regulates the handling of almonds grown in California. The key change is the proposed addition of authority for the Almond Board of California to borrow funds from commercial lending institutions. This action is being taken under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 and is subject to public comment before a potential subsequent referendum and final rule.
Interested parties, including almond growers and handlers, are invited to submit written comments by May 19, 2026. The AMS will review these comments to determine if the amendment is warranted. If approved, a subsequent proposed rule and referendum would be issued. Compliance officers should ensure their organizations are aware of this proposed amendment and consider submitting comments if it impacts their operations or financial strategies. Failure to comment may result in the proposed amendment proceeding without their input.
What to do next
- Review proposed amendment to Marketing Order No. 981 regarding borrowing authority.
- Submit written comments by May 19, 2026, if applicable.
Source document (simplified)
Content
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY:
This proposed rule invites comments on a proposed amendment to Marketing Order No. 981, which regulates the handling of almonds
grown in California. The proposed amendment would establish the authority to borrow funds from a commercial lending institution.
DATES:
Comments must be received by May 19, 2026.
ADDRESSES:
Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this proposed rule. Comments can be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Market Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250-0237. Comments can also be sent to the Docket Clerk electronically by email: MarketingOrderComment@usda.gov or via the internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the document number, the date and page number of this issue of the
Federal Register
. Comments submitted in response to this proposed rule will be included in the record and will be made available to the public
and can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. Please be advised that comments are posted to regulations.gov without change.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Taylor Johnson, Marketing Specialist, or Matthew Pavone, Chief, Rulemaking Services Branch, Market Development Division, Specialty
Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; telephone: (202) 720-2491, fax:
(202) 720-8938, or email: MarketOrderComment@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, proposes to amend regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 7
CFR 900.2(j). This proposed rule is issued under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674)
(the Act), amending Marketing Order No. 981 (7 CFR part 981; the Order), regulating the handling of almonds grown in California.
The Almond Board of California (Board) locally administers the Order and is comprised of growers and handlers of almonds operating
within California.
Section 608c(17) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 608c(17)) and the applicable rules of practice and procedure at 7 CFR 900.43 authorize
amendment of the Order through this informal rulemaking action. The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) will consider comments
received in response to this proposed rule and, based on all the information available, will determine if the amendment is
warranted. If AMS determines amendment of the Order is warranted, a subsequent proposed rule and notice of referendum would
be issued, and growers would be allowed to vote for or against the proposed Order amendment. AMS would then issue a final
rule effectuating any amendments favored in the referendum.
This action is exempt from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review process required by Executive Order 12866. This
rule amends existing Marketing Order No. 981, as amended (7 CFR part 981), Almonds Grown in California, and is necessary for
the continued operation of Marketing Order No. 981. Additionally, this action is exempt from the requirements of Executive
Order 14192, “Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation,” pursuant to section 5(c).
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175, “Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,”
which requires Federal agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would have Tribal implications. AMS has determined
that this rule is unlikely to have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government
and Indian Tribes.
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, “Civil Justice Reform.” This proposed rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect. This proposed rule shall not be deemed to preclude, preempt, or supersede any State program covering
almonds grown in California.
Section 608c(17) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 608c(17)) and the supplemental rules of practice at 7 CFR 900.43 authorize the use of
informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) to amend Federal fruit, vegetable, and nut marketing agreements and orders. In determining
whether informal rulemaking is appropriate, USDA is required to consider the nature and complexity of the proposed amendments,
the potential regulatory and economic impacts on affected entities, and any other relevant matters.
AMS has considered these factors and has determined that the amendment proposed herein is not unduly complex and the nature
of the proposed amendment is appropriate for utilizing the informal rulemaking process to amend the Order. A discussion of
the potential regulatory and economic impacts on affected entities is discussed later in the “Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis” section of this proposed rule.
The Board discussed the proposal at length at its meeting held on August 8, 2024. Following that meeting, the Board voted
on the proposed amendment to the Order, nine in favor and one opposed, by electronic vote distributed on August 19 and concluded
on August 28, 2024.
Proposal—Seasonal Line of Credit
Section 981.81 of the Order authorizes the collection of assessments from almond handlers to provide funds to meet authorized
Board expenses and the operating reserve requirements. This proposal would establish § 981.81(f), to authorize the Board to
borrow funds from a commercial lending institution through a seasonal line of credit. The authority to borrow would provide
short term funds to address cashflow constraints associated with the timing of program expenditures and revenue collection.
This would ensure continuity in operations and Board functions, such as during the first few months of the marketing year
when new crop is received but no assessment
revenue is collected. Borrowed funds would be repaid within a maximum period of 12 months.
The topic of borrowing authority previously appeared before California almond growers as a proposed amendment to the Order
during a proposed rulemaking in April 2023 (88 FR 25559) and subsequent referendum order (88 FR 68500) conducted by USDA between
October 30 and November 20, 2023. The proposal to add borrowing authority to the Order received the support of 63.59% of almond
growers voting, representing 56.15% of the production volume. To be enacted, at least two-thirds of the growers voting, or
at least two-thirds of the volume represented by those growers voting, would need to vote in favor of a proposal. The outcome
fell just shy of these thresholds and was not enacted.
The Board reviewed and discussed borrowing authority over several meetings in 2023 and 2024 to identify the underlying cause
of the failed amendment. It was determined the cause of the failed amendment was a combination of grower confusion with the
regulatory language that appeared on the ballot and a lack of coordinated communication with stakeholders. Despite the failure,
the Board maintained that having borrowing authority would allow it to better manage approved expenditures within its established
internal control policies, and would help maintain cash flow.
As almond tonnage and assessment revenue have increased since the Order's promulgation, the industry has approved increasingly
larger budgets which have year-round financial commitments. However, growers do not necessarily deliver the entire assessable
crop at one time, nor do handlers have the facilities to process the entire crop at one time, and handlers instead purchase
and market almonds throughout the production cycle. As a result, only about 18 percent of assessment revenue is paid to the
Board when the first crop year assessment invoice is sent to handlers in October. Subsequently, the Board invoices for assessments
in the second and third quarters of the crop year. Yet, many research activities and marketing programs are initiated early
in the crop year, necessitating payment when services are performed, often well before the first assessments are received
from October invoices. Although the Board currently maintains a reserve fund to help pay for early expenses, this fund is
insufficient to advance some of the necessary payments. Authorizing the Board to borrow from commercial lending institutions
would help it manage and sustain program activities during times of cash flow deficiencies.
Board members further noted that the ability to borrow against a line of credit is a common tool authorized in other Federal
marketing orders, especially to accommodate expenses when the assessment revenue necessary to pay such expenses is not received
until later in the year.
While addressing general business concerns about the potential risks associated with debt financing, the Board agreed that
its internal control policies would be revised to reflect the new borrowing authorities. Notably, the Board stressed that
these policies would include: monitoring by the finance department to take interest rates, debt levels, and timing of loans
into consideration; allowing the lending institution to determine the maximum line of credit available; making the amount
of credit needed proportional to the net position; and, ensuring line of credit advances are short term in nature, with preferred
lengths and timelines to be decided by the industry-led finance and audit committee. The Board continues to believe that this
proposal would make the Board more operationally efficient while not exceeding approved crop year budget ceilings. The Board
does not anticipate this amendment to negatively impact California almond growers or handlers of any size.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic
impact of this proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions in order that small
businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 7,596 almond growers in the production area and 100 handlers subject to regulation under the Order.
At the time this analysis was prepared, the Small Business Administration (SBA) defined small agricultural producers of almonds
as those having annual receipts equal to or less than $3,750,000 (North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code
111335, Tree Nut Farming). Small agricultural service firms, which include almond handlers, are defined by the SBA as those
having annual receipts equal to or less than $34,000,000 (NAICS code 115114, Postharvest Crop Activities) (13 CFR 121.201).
To estimate the number of almond growers that would be considered small businesses per the SBA definition, AMS calculates
the acreage required to produce the volume of almonds at an average price to reach the $3.75 million threshold. Due to the
alternate-bearing nature of almonds, a two-year average is used to estimate price and yield, based on the most recent National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) data for 2023 and 2024. Based on a two-year average price of $1.93 per pound, shelled,
and a two-year average yield of 1,880 pounds per acre, shelled, an almond grower would need more than 1,033 bearing acres
to exceed the SBA threshold of $3.75 million ($3.75 million divided by $1.93 per pound, divided by 1,880 pounds per acre).
According to the 2022 Census of Agriculture, 134 farms had almond acreage of 1,500 acres or more. This means that of the 7,596
growers in California, at least 98 percent of them would be considered small businesses.
To estimate the number of almond handlers that would be considered small businesses, per the SBA definition, AMS calculates
total handler revenue using AMS Market News terminal market prices for almonds and for total California almond production,
reported by NASS. The 2024 average terminal market price, used as a proxy for handler price, for almonds grown in California
was $2.82 per pound. Total 2024 California production of almonds was 2.73 billion pounds, shelled. Assuming that all California
almonds were processed by domestic handlers, total handler revenue in 2024 is estimated to be nearly $7.7 billion ($2.82 per
pound multiplied by 2.73 billion pounds). If total handler revenue were evenly distributed among the 100 handlers in the production
region, then each handler would have a 2024 annual receipt of nearly $77 million ($7.7 billion divided by 100 handlers), surpassing
the $34 million threshold of the SBA definition of a small business. Therefore, based on this analysis, AMS estimates that
most almond handlers would not be considered small businesses per the SBA definition.
This proposal would establish § 981.81(f) to authorize the Board to borrow funds from a commercial lending institution through
a seasonal line of credit. The authority to borrow funds would provide necessary short term funds, given cashflow constraints
associated with the timing of program
expenditures and revenue collection. This amendment would better ensure continuity in operations during periods when neither
operating assessments nor reserve funds are sufficient to fund the Board functions. Borrowed funds would be repaid within
a maximum period of 12 months.
The Board noted that the ability to borrow against a line of credit is a common tool authorized in other Federal marketing
orders, especially to accommodate expenses when the assessment revenue necessary to pay such expenses is not received until
later in the year.
While addressing general business concerns about the potential risks associated with debt financing, the Board agreed that
its internal control policies would be revised to reflect the new borrowing authorities. Notably, the Board stressed that
these policies would include: monitoring by the finance department to take interest rates, debt levels, and timing of loans
into consideration; allowing the lending institution to determine the maximum line of credit available; making the amount
of credit needed proportional to the net position; and, ensuring line of credit advances are short term in nature, with preferred
lengths and timelines to be decided by the industry-led finance and audit committee. The Board continues to believe that this
proposal would make the Board more operationally efficient while not exceeding approved crop year budget ceilings. The Board
does not anticipate this to negatively impact California almond growers or handlers of any size.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements
have been previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178, Vegetable and Specialty Crops. No changes in those requirements
are necessary because of this proposed rule. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large almond
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the internet and other information technologies
to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes.
AMS has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.
The Board's meetings are widely publicized throughout the California almond production area. All interested persons are invited
to attend the meetings and encouraged to participate in Board deliberations on all issues. Like all Board meetings, the meeting
held on August 8, 2024, was public, and all entities, both large and small, were encouraged to express their views on the
proposed amendment.
Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the proposed amendment to the Order, including comments on the regulatory
and information collection impacts of this action on small businesses.
Following analysis of any comments received on the amendment discussed in this proposed rule, AMS will evaluate all available
information and determine whether to proceed. If appropriate, AMS would publish a proposed rule and notice of referendum,
and growers could vote for or against the proposed amendment. AMS would publish information about the referendum, including
dates and voter eligibility requirements, in a future issue of the
Federal Register
. AMS would then publish a final rule to effectuate any amendment favored in the referendum.
General Findings
The findings hereinafter set forth are supplementary to the findings and determinations which were previously made in connection
with the issuance of Marketing Order 981; and all said previous findings and determinations are hereby ratified and affirmed,
except insofar as such findings and determinations may be in conflict with the findings and determinations set forth herein.
Marketing Order 981 as hereby proposed to be amended and all the terms and conditions thereof, would tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act;Marketing Order 981 as hereby proposed to be amended regulates the handling of almonds grown in California and is applicable
only to persons in the respective classes of commercial and industrial activity specified in the Order;Marketing Order 981 as hereby proposed to be amended is limited in application to the smallest regional production area
which is practicable, consistent with carrying out the declared policy of the Act, and the issuance of several marketing orders
applicable to subdivisions of the production area would not effectively carry out the declared policy of the Act;Marketing Order 981 as hereby proposed to be amended prescribes, insofar as practicable, such different terms applicable
to different parts of the production area as are necessary to give due recognition to the differences in the production and
marketing of almonds produced or packed in the production area; andAll handling of almonds grown or handled in the production area, as defined in Marketing Order 981, is in the current of
interstate or foreign commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such commerce.
A 60-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposal. Any comments received on the
amendment proposed in this rule will be analyzed, and if AMS determines to proceed based on all the information presented,
a grower referendum would be conducted to determine grower support for the proposed amendment. If appropriate, a final rule
would then be issued to effectuate the amendment favored by growers participating in the referendum.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, AMS proposes to amend 7 CFR part 981 as follows:
PART 981—ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
- The authority citation for part 981 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
7 U.S.C. 601-674.
- In § 981.81, add paragraph (f) to read as follows:
§ 981.81 Assessment. * * * * *
(f) Seasonal Line of Credit. To provide short term funds given cashflow constraints associated with the timing of program expenditures and revenue collection.
The Board may borrow money from a commercial lending institution for such purposes; funds will be repaid within a maximum
of 12 months.
Erin Morris, Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2026-05542 Filed 3-19-26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
Download File
Download
CFR references
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Agriculture & Food Safety alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Regs.gov: Agricultural Marketing Service publishes new changes.