State Dept Security Review Committee Membership Procedures

Rule

Security Review Committee

A Rule by the State Department on 04/27/2026

• PDF

• Document Details

• Document Dates

- Table of Contents

• Public Comments
• Regulations.gov Data

- Sharing

• Print
• Document Statistics
• Other Formats
• Public Inspection Published Document: 2026-08148 (91 FR 22454) Document Headings ###### Department of State

1. 22 CFR Part 7
2. [Public Notice: 12976]
3. RIN 1400-AG28

AGENCY:

Department of State.

ACTION:

Final rule.

SUMMARY:

The Secretary of State is promulgating rules defining the membership and operating procedures of the Department of State's Security Review Committee, an internal panel that reviews serious security incidents.

DATES:

This rule is effective on May 27, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alice Kottmyer, Attorney Adviser, ( printed page 22455) Office of Management, Office of the Legal Adviser, kottmyeram@state.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Why is the Department promulgating this rule?

In 2022, section 9302(d) of Public Law 117-263 established the Security Review Committee (SRC), which required the Secretary of State to also publish rules relating to the SRC's membership and operating procedures. The SRC is an internal review process by a panel composed of designated assistant secretary-level federal employees, who are directed to assess a serious security incident involving loss of life, serious injury, or significant destruction of property at or related to a U.S. diplomatic mission abroad. The Committee determines whether the Department of State's security policies, procedures, and programs worked appropriately and as intended. Meetings of an SRC are not open to the public.

Regulatory Analysis

Administrative Procedure Act

This rulemaking is a rule of agency organization, practice and procedure, and hence is exempt from notice and comment rulemaking pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Department of State, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed this regulation and, by approving it, certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995

This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.

Congressional Review Act

This rule is exempt from the Congressional Review Act, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(C).

Executive Order 12866, 14192, and 13563

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has designated this rulemaking as not significant under Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review. The Department has reviewed the regulation to ensure its consistency with the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in Executive Order 12866. The Department of State has considered this rule in light of Executive Order 13563 and affirms that this regulation is consistent with the guidance therein. Since this rule is not significant, it is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order 14192.

Executive Orders 12372 and 13132

This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do not apply to this regulation.

Executive Order 12988

The Department of State has reviewed the rule considering sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce burdens.

Executive Order 13175

The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking will not have Tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian Tribal governments, and will not pre-empt Tribal law. Accordingly, the requirements of Section 5 of Executive Order 13175 do not apply to this rulemaking.

Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.

List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 7

• Organization and functions (Government agencies) For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of State adds part 7 to title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations to read as follows:

PART 7—SECURITY REVIEW COMMITTEE

7.1 Introduction. 7.2 Security Review Committee Membership. 7.3 Security Review Committee Operating Procedures. Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 4833.

§ 7.1 Introduction. The Secretary of State is required to convene a Security Review Committee in case of a serious security incident involving loss of life, serious injury, or significant destruction of property at, or related to, a U.S. diplomatic mission abroad, and in any case of a serious breach of security involving intelligence activities of a foreign government directed at a U.S. mission abroad.

§ 7.2 Security Review Committee Membership. (a) The Security Review Committee is comprised of officials filling the positions below, to include an official authorized to perform the duties of the position listed below in paragraphs (a)(1) through (6) by operation of federal law or through delegation of authority from the Secretary of State:

(1) the Executive Director of the Executive Office for Management;

(2) the Assistant Secretary of State responsible for the region where the incident occurred;

(3) the Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security;

(4) the Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research;

(5) an Assistant Secretary-level representative from any involved United States Government department or agency; and

(6) other personnel determined by the Secretary of State to be necessary or appropriate.

(b) The Executive Director of the Executive Office for Management serves as chairperson of the SRC, unless otherwise designated by the Secretary of State in a particular case.

§ 7.3 Security Review Committee Operating Procedures. (a) All U.S. diplomatic posts must follow standard incident reporting requirements established by Diplomatic Security, including an official cable notification of an initial report of a potential serious security incident not later than three days after such incident occurs, whenever feasible.

(b) The Under Secretary for Management directs Diplomatic Security to assemble a Security Investigative Team within 10 days of receiving a report of a potential serious security incident.

(c) When directed by the Secretary, either Deputy Secretary, or the Under Secretary for Management, the Assistant ( printed page 22456) Secretary for Diplomatic Security forms the Security Investigative Team and reviews the Security Investigative Team's composition for any conflict, appearance of conflict, or lack of independence and on an expedited basis seeks approval from the Under Secretary for Management for the composition of the Security Investigative Team.

(d) The Under Secretary for Management approves the composition of the Security Investigative Team. The Under Secretary for Management will endeavor to respond within five days to Diplomatic Security's request for approval of the composition of the Security Investigative Team.

(e) The Security Investigative Team investigates the potential serious security incident and independently establishes what occurred consistent with the statutory requirements. The Security Investigative Team collects information, conducts interviews, reviews relevant information and evidence, and makes a written administrative Report of Investigation within 90 days of the occurrence of the potential serious security incident.

(f) The Secretary convenes a Security Review Committee within 60 days of the occurrence of the potential serious security incident, or within 120 days of the potential serious security incident if the Secretary extends the period by 60 days.

(g) The Security Review Committee reviews the Report of Investigation and any other evidence, reporting, and relevant information related to a potential serious security incident. The Security Review Committee makes a written report to the Secretary no later than 60 days after receiving the Report of Investigation, unless the Secretary extends this period for an additional 60 days. The written SRC report provides a full account of what occurred, makes required determinations as set out in the Security Review Committee statute, and makes recommendations, as warranted.

(h) The Bureau of Legislative Affairs will provide the designated committees of Congress with the following: a notification within eight days of identifying a potential serious security incident; a notification promptly upon establishment of a Security Review Committee; a copy of any written report by the Security Review Committee submitted to the Secretary of State no later than 90 days after the Secretary of State receives it.

(i) Nothing in 22 CFR part 7 precludes the Secretary from immediately directing the formation of a Security Investigative Team or a Security Review Committee following an initial report of a potential serious security incident.

Dated: April 21, 2026. .

Alice M. Kottmyer,

Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2026-08148 Filed 4-24-26; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-35-P

Published Document: 2026-08148 (91 FR 22454)