Changeflow GovPing Trade & Sanctions OFAC Issues General Licenses 56 and 57 Easing V...
Routine Notice Added Final

OFAC Issues General Licenses 56 and 57 Easing Venezuela Sanctions

Favicon for www.jdsupra.com JD Supra Trade Law
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

On April 14, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued General License No. 56 and General License No. 57 under the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations, representing a meaningful relaxation of U.S. sanctions on commercial and financial services transactions in Venezuela. GL 56 authorizes U.S. persons and companies to negotiate contingent commercial contracts with the Government of Venezuela, provided that entry and performance are expressly contingent upon separate OFAC authorization. GL 57 permits a broad range of financial services to, from, or for the benefit of specified Venezuelan banks, including Banco Central de Venezuela, Banco de Venezuela, Banco Digital de los Trabajadores, and Banco del Tesoro, as well as certain government-affiliated individuals.

“Together, while these licenses do not amount to a lifting of sanctions, they represent a meaningful relaxation of U.S. sanctions for commercial and financial services transactions in Venezuela and create important new pathways for businesses and financial institutions to position themselves in the Venezuelan market.”

Why this matters

Companies and financial institutions considering Venezuela engagement should prioritize counterparty due diligence to identify any nexus to excluded jurisdictions (Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, China) before commencing negotiations or transactions under these licenses. Existing asset freezes and SDN restrictions remain in full force; GL 56 and GL 57 create pathways for negotiation and financial services, but do not authorize execution of contracts or unblocking of assets absent separate OFAC authorization.

AI-drafted from the source document, validated against GovPing's analyst note standards . For the primary regulatory language, read the source document .
Published by King & Spalding on jdsupra.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

JD Supra is the legal industry's open library where US and international law firms publish client alerts and regulatory analysis. The Trade Law section aggregates everything from partners covering customs, tariffs, sanctions enforcement, export controls, anti-dumping, CFIUS, and supply-chain compliance. Around 310 alerts a month from across the bar. Watch this if you advise on US trade policy whiplash, manage tariff exposure for a manufacturer, run an OFAC compliance program, or track EU and UK sanctions enforcement against Russia. The signal-to-noise ratio is genuinely good because firms only publish when they have something to say to their own clients. GovPing pulls each alert with the firm name, author, and topic.

What changed

General License 56 authorizes negotiation of contingent commercial contracts with the Government of Venezuela, broadly defined to include the Venezuelan state, its agencies, instrumentalities, state-owned enterprises, and the Central Bank of Venezuela. The license covers pro forma invoices, agreements in principle, bids, binding MOUs, and similar arrangements, provided that performance is expressly contingent on separate OFAC authorization. GL 56 explicitly does not authorize transactions under E.O. 13808 (Venezuelan government bonds, PdVSA debt) or E.O. 13835 (equity in PdVSA or government-owned entities), transactions involving persons from Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, or China, non-commercially reasonable payment terms, or dealings with SDN-listed persons.

General License 57 authorizes a wide range of financial services including account maintenance, loans, wire transfers, insurance, ACH, payment cards, digital wallets, currency exchange, payroll, cybersecurity services, and securities to specified Venezuelan banks and individuals blocked solely under E.O. 13884. Financial institutions and companies considering engagement with Venezuela should conduct thorough counterparty diligence to confirm no excluded jurisdiction nexus exists, particularly given the Venezuelan government's commercial ties with Russia, China, Iran, and Cuba.

Archived snapshot

Apr 25, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

April 24, 2026

OFAC Eases Sanctions On Financial Services And Commercial-Related Transactions In Venezuela

Shaswat Das, Christine Savage, Kanzanira Thorington King & Spalding + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X ;) Embed

On April 14, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) issued two general licenses under the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations (“VSR”): General License No. 56 (“GL 56”) and General License No. 57 (“GL 57”). GL 56 authorizes companies to negotiate commercial deals with the Government of Venezuela, provided that the entry into and performance of such contracts are contingent on OFAC approval. GL 57 permits a broad range of financial services involving certain Venezuelan banks and government-affiliated individuals.

Together, while these licenses do not amount to a lifting of sanctions, they represent a meaningful relaxation of U.S. sanctions for commercial and financial services transactions in Venezuela and create important new pathways for businesses and financial institutions to position themselves in the Venezuelan market.

This client alert provides an overview of each license and key considerations for companies and financial institutions assessing opportunities in Venezuela.

General License 56

GL 56 authorizes U.S. persons and companies to negotiate commercial contracts with the Government of Venezuela, provided that the entry into and performance of any such contract is made expressly contingent upon separate authorization from OFAC. Therefore, U.S. companies can negotiate deal terms, but they may not enter into or perform the contract until OFAC provides approval.

Under GL 56:

  • “Government of Venezuela” is defined very broadly. It covers not just the state itself, but also any political subdivision, agency, instrumentality, state-owned or state-controlled entity, and anyone acting on behalf of the Venezuelan government. The Central Bank of Venezuela falls within the definition of “Government of Venezuela.”
  • “Contingent contracts” is also broadly defined, covering executory contracts, pro forma invoices, agreements in principle, bids and proposals (including responses to public tenders), binding MOUs, and similar arrangements. Most forms of preliminary or conditional commercial agreements are covered, which gives companies flexibility in how they structure early-stage negotiations.
    Importantly, GL 56 contains significant restrictions and does not authorize:

  • Any transactions that are separately prohibited under other Venezuela-related executive orders — notably Executive Order (“E.O.”) 13808 (which restricts dealings in Venezuelan government bonds and Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (“PdVSA”) debt) and E.O. 13835 (which restricts equity interests in PdVSA or entities 50% or more owned by the Venezuelan government). This means GL 56 does not open the door to bond purchases, debt trading, or equity investments in Venezuelan state-owned enterprises;

  • Transactions involving persons (i) located in or organized under the laws or Russia, Iran, North Korea, or Cuba; or (ii) entities owned or controlled by or in a joint venture with persons from these excluded jurisdictions;

  • Transactions with Venezuelan or U.S. entities that are owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by or in a joint venture with a person located in or organized under the laws of China;

  • Payment terms that are not “commercially reasonable,” i.e., involving debt swaps or payments in gold, or are denominated in digital currency, digital coin, or digital tokens issued by, for, or on behalf of the Government of Venezuela, including the petro;

  • The entry into settlement agreements or enforcement of liens, judgments, or other orders that affect blocked property;

  • Transactions involving persons on OFAC’s List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (“SDN List”) or entities that are 50% or more owned by SDN-listed persons; or

  • The unblocking of any property blocked under 31 CFR Chapter V. Therefore, existing asset freezes remain in place.
    For businesses, GL 56 creates an opportunity to begin negotiating commercial arrangements with the Venezuelan government. However, GL 56 authorizes only the negotiation of contingent contracts; it does not authorize the execution or performance of those contracts absent a separate OFAC authorization. This two-step structure means that companies should structure their negotiations and any associated expenditures accordingly, including by ensuring that preliminary agreements clearly state that performance is contingent on OFAC approval and that no binding obligations arise prior to such approval.

The restrictions on transactions involving persons from Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and China also warrant careful counterparty diligence, as the Venezuelan government maintains significant commercial and diplomatic ties with several of these jurisdictions. In practice, these carve-outs may substantially limit the pool of permissible counterparties in sectors where Venezuelan state-owned enterprises have existing joint ventures or supply arrangements with entities from excluded jurisdictions. Companies should conduct thorough ownership and control analyses of potential Venezuelan counterparties to confirm that no excluded jurisdiction nexus exists before commencing negotiations.

Notably, the continuing prohibitions under E.O. 13808 and E.O. 13835 mean that GL 56 does not create opportunities in the Venezuelan sovereign debt market or for equity investments in PdVSA or other Venezuelan state-owned enterprises. Businesses considering commercial engagement in the energy sector should be particularly attentive to these limitations, given PdVSA’s central role in the Venezuelan economy.

General License 57

GL 57 authorizes a wide range of financial services to, from, or for the benefit of the following persons:

  1. Banco Central de Venezuela;
  2. Banco de Venezuela, S.A. Banco Universal (Banco de Venezuela);
  3. Banco Digital de los Trabajadores Banco Universal C.A.;
  4. Banco del Tesoro, C.A. Banco Universal (Banco del Tesoro);
  5. Any entity in which one or more of the above banks own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest; and
  6. Any individual whose property is blocked solely under E.O. 13884 because they fall within the definition of “Government of Venezuela” (including current government employees) — but not anyone who is individually named on the SDN List. GL 57 also covers any transactions involving the Government of Venezuela that would otherwise be prohibited by E.O. 13884, provided that those transactions are necessary for carrying out the financial services described above. In practice, this means that ancillary steps needed to facilitate an authorized financial service — such as correspondent banking transactions or clearing activities — are also permitted.

The definition of “financial services” under GL 57 is notably broad. It includes account maintenance, loans, banking and money transfer services, insurance, ACH and wire transfers, payment card and digital wallet transactions, currency exchange, U.S. dollar-denominated correspondent account services, payroll and employment-related payments, digital payment transfers, cybersecurity services, investments, securities, and commodity futures or options. As a practical matter, this definition covers nearly every type of banking and financial product that a U.S. institution might offer, making GL 57 a significant opening for financial institutions that seek to serve Venezuelan clients or process Venezuela-related transactions.

For financial institutions, GL 57 opens the door to providing a wide range of financial services involving key Venezuelan banks and government-affiliated individuals. The breadth of the “financial services” definition means that most standard banking products and payment processing services are now within scope, including correspondent banking, payment card services, insurance, currency exchange, and digital payment transfers. This represents a substantial commercial opportunity for institutions with the risk appetite and compliance infrastructure to serve the Venezuelan market.

Nonetheless, financial institutions should proceed carefully under this general license. GL 57 does not unblock previously frozen assets, and SDN List exclusions require rigorous screening of all counterparties and beneficial owners. The list of authorized Venezuelan banks is limited to four named institutions and their majority-owned subsidiaries; institutions must verify that the specific entity they are transacting with falls within the license’s scope. For individual counterparties, GL 57 covers only those whose property is blocked solely under E.O. 13884 by virtue of falling within the definition of “Government of Venezuela”; individuals who are separately named on the SDN List remain fully blocked. Financial institutions should implement enhanced screening protocols that distinguish between these categories.

GL 57 contains a safe harbor provision for financial institutions, which are allowed to rely on originator or beneficiary representations when processing funds transfers, provided that the processing institution does not know or have reason to know that the transaction falls outside the scope of GL 57. Although this provision provides a degree of comfort, it is limited by the “know or have reason to know” standard. Therefore, institutions that process high volumes of Venezuela-related transactions should consider implementing additional monitoring controls to identify red flags that could impute constructive knowledge. In addition, all standard anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, and FinCEN regulations remain fully applicable, and institutions should expect heightened regulatory scrutiny of Venezuela-related transactions even where those transactions fall within the scope of GL 57.

Key Considerations

These general licenses represent a meaningful shift in U.S. sanctions policy toward Venezuela’s commercial and financial services sector. For businesses, GL 56 creates an opportunity to begin negotiating commercial arrangements with the Venezuelan government now, positioning themselves to move quickly if OFAC grants performance authorization. For financial institutions, GL 57 opens the door to providing a wide range of financial services involving key Venezuelan banks and government-affiliated individuals. However, both general licenses include significant limitations and compliance obligations for businesses. Companies should review the authorizations carefully and conduct due diligence, including SDN screening of all parties, before entering into any transactions. Given the complexity of Venezuela’s sanctions landscape, companies and financial institutions that are considering entering into the Venezuelan market should consider updating internal compliance policies and training materials to reflect the new authorizations and their limits. Companies should also bear in mind that general licenses can be amended, narrowed, or revoked at any time, and should structure their engagements to account for the possibility that the regulatory environment may shift.

;) ;) Report

Related Posts

Latest Posts

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
King & Spalding

Written by:

King & Spalding Contact + Follow Shaswat Das + Follow Christine Savage + Follow Kanzanira Thorington + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • ✔ Increased readership
  • ✔ Actionable analytics
  • ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Banking Sector + Follow Cross-Border Transactions + Follow Due Diligence + Follow Economic Sanctions + Follow Executive Orders + Follow Financial Institutions + Follow Financial Services Industry + Follow General Licenses + Follow International Trade + Follow Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) + Follow General Business + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow International Trade + Follow more less

King & Spalding on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide

Get daily alerts for JD Supra Trade Law

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from King & Spalding.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
King & Spalding
Published
April 24th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Branch
Executive
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive

Who this affects

Applies to
Banks Financial advisers Importers and exporters
Industry sector
5221 Commercial Banking
Activity scope
Sanctions compliance Venezuela transactions Financial services
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Sanctions
Operational domain
Compliance
Compliance frameworks
OFAC Sanctions
Topics
International Trade Banking

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when JD Supra Trade Law publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!