Changeflow GovPing Trade & Sanctions Dutch Bill Aims to Significantly Modernize and ...
Routine Notice Added Draft

Dutch Bill Aims to Significantly Modernize and Strengthen Sanctions Enforcement

Favicon for www.jdsupra.com JD Supra Trade Law
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

The Dutch House of Representatives received a proposal for the International Sanctions Measures Act (WIS) on February 19, 2026. The bill would replace the current Sanctions Act (Sanctiewet 1977) and introduce administrative enforcement powers alongside existing criminal penalties for sanctions violations. It also enables government appointment of administrators to direct or replace company management in specific circumstances.

What changed

The proposed International Sanctions Measures Act (WIS) would replace the current Dutch Sanctions Act and significantly expand enforcement options for sanctions violations.

Affected parties including Dutch-based companies, importers, exporters, and energy companies should monitor the bill's progress through Parliament. The proposed dual enforcement system would allow administrative agencies to impose fines and enforcement orders for less-severe breaches, with criminal enforcement reserved as a last resort. The bill also introduces powers for government-appointed administrators to intervene directly in company management in specific situations.

What to do next

  1. Monitor WIS legislative progress
  2. Prepare for dual administrative-criminal enforcement framework
  3. Review sanctions compliance policies for Dutch operations

Archived snapshot

Apr 11, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

April 10, 2026

Dutch Bill Aims to Significantly Modernize and Strengthen Sanctions Enforcement in the Netherlands

Nicolas Brice, Kevin Capatina, Ravelle Melissen, Nadiya Nychay, Elizabeth Robertson, Paloma Valor, Rick van 't Hullenaar Jones Day + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed

The proposed International Sanctions Measures Act intends to modernize the Dutch sanctions framework by significantly expanding enforcement and intervention options for sanctions violations, shifting part of enforcement to administrative law, and introducing a central reporting point in the Netherlands.

On February 19, 2026, the proposal for the International Sanctions Measures Act (Wet internationale sanctiemaatregelen, the "WIS") was submitted to the Dutch House of Representatives. As an initial step in the parliamentary process, a roundtable discussion was held in Parliament on March 25, 2026, which confirmed broad consensus about the need for the proposal.

The WIS is intended to largely replace the current Dutch Sanctions Act (Sanctiewet 1977, the "SW"). The Dutch sanctions framework predominantly consists of directly applicable EU regulations, leaving the SW to serve principally as a framework for the regulations' national implementation (e.g., licensing) and enforcement. The proposal for the WIS follows the May 2022 recommendation of the Dutch National Coordinator for Sanctions Compliance and Enforcement to strengthen the Dutch sanctions system and to ensure that legislation keeps pace with the increasing scale and complexity of international sanctions regimes.

This recommendation and the WIS are also driven by the sharp increase in sanctions activity, particularly the EU Russia Sanctions, and the Dutch government's view that effective compliance and enforcement have lagged due to limitations in the SW.

The WIS introduces several significant changes to the current framework. Most notably, it establishes new administrative enforcement powers for sanctions violations. Under the current Dutch regime, sanctions violations are penalized and enforced primarily through criminal law under the Economic Offenses Act (Wet op de economische delicten). The WIS introduces a dual enforcement system, enabling certain administrative agencies to impose designation decisions, administrative enforcement orders, and administrative fines for sanctions violations. The explanatory memorandum indicates that the Dutch legislator considers administrative enforcement more suitable for less-severe breaches, with criminal enforcement reserved as an ultimum remedium, or last resort.

The WIS also introduces powers enabling authorities to intervene directly in a company's management in certain specific situations. For Dutch-based companies where the impact of sanctions on their stability or continuity may cause serious societal, economic, or employment consequences, the Minister of Economic Affairs may appoint an administrator with powers to direct, represent or, if necessary, replace, management.

Where a company subject to a sanctions obligation is seriously noncompliant or poses a risk of serious circumvention of sanctions, including through connected companies, the Minister may appoint persons to replace management outright to ensure compliance and prevent circumvention. Additionally, for long-term frozen registered property, designated Ministers may assume or delegate management in certain specific situations, including where societal harm risks arise in relation to the registered property.

Finally, the WIS introduces measures to enhance transparency and information sharing. These include a legal basis for recording in public registers connections with sanctioned persons or entities and improved data exchange possibilities between competent authorities to map complex ownership structures and identify assets of sanctioned individuals. It also introduces a legal basis to establish a central reporting point for sanctions in the Netherlands.

The WIS must still pass both the House of Representatives and Senate before taking effect, and it may be amended during the legislative process. If adopted in its current form, it would significantly overhaul the Dutch sanctions framework, expanding the enforcement toolkit and introducing far-reaching intervention powers.

Send Print Report

Latest Posts

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
Jones Day

Written by:

Jones Day Contact + Follow Nicolas Brice + Follow Kevin Capatina + Follow Ravelle Melissen + Follow Nadiya Nychay + Follow Elizabeth Robertson + Follow Paloma Valor + Follow Rick van 't Hullenaar + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • ✔ Increased readership
  • ✔ Actionable analytics
  • ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Economic Sanctions + Follow Enforcement Actions + Follow EU + Follow Government Agencies + Follow Netherlands + Follow Proposed Legislation + Follow Regulatory Agenda + Follow Regulatory Oversight + Follow Regulatory Reform + Follow Reporting Requirements + Follow Sanction Violations + Follow General Business + Follow Criminal + Follow International Trade + Follow more less

Jones Day on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide

Named provisions

International Sanctions Measures Act Sanctiewet 1977

Get daily alerts for JD Supra Trade Law

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Jones Day.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
Jones Day
Published
April 10th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Draft
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Manufacturers Importers and exporters Energy companies
Industry sector
2111 Oil & Gas Extraction 5221 Commercial Banking 3364 Aerospace & Defense
Activity scope
Sanctions compliance Export controls Corporate management
Geographic scope
NL NL

Taxonomy

Primary area
Sanctions
Operational domain
Compliance
Compliance frameworks
OFAC Sanctions
Topics
International Trade Anti-Money Laundering Corporate Governance

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when JD Supra Trade Law publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!