Changeflow GovPing Trade & Sanctions DOJ Declines Prosecution of Medical Device Firm...
Priority review Enforcement Amended Final

DOJ Declines Prosecution of Medical Device Firm Under New CEP

Favicon for www.jdsupra.com JD Supra Trade Law
Filed March 19th, 2026
Detected March 26th, 2026
Email

Summary

The DOJ announced its first declination under the new Department-wide Corporate Enforcement Policy (CEP) in an FCPA matter involving Balt SAS, a medical device company. Balt SAS will disgorge approximately $1.2 million in profits tied to alleged foreign bribery. This declination highlights the DOJ's continued emphasis on voluntary self-disclosure, cooperation, and remediation.

What changed

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has issued its first declination under the new Department-wide Corporate Enforcement Policy (CEP) concerning Balt SAS, a medical device company, and its subsidiary Balt USA LLC. The DOJ declined to prosecute Balt for alleged foreign bribery involving a physician at a state-owned hospital in France between 2017 and 2023. Balt paid over $600,000 in bribes, disguised as consulting fees, which generated approximately $1.68 million in revenue and $1.21 million in profits. As part of the resolution, Balt has agreed to disgorge approximately $1.2 million in profits and entered into a parallel resolution with French authorities.

This declination signifies the DOJ's practical application of its CEP, emphasizing voluntary self-disclosure, full cooperation, and timely remediation as key factors for leniency. Companies facing potential FCPA violations should note that meeting these criteria, as Balt did by disciplining individuals, ending problematic business relationships, and strengthening compliance programs, can lead to a declination. While the core factors remain consistent with prior practice, this marks a formal application of the new department-wide policy, suggesting that robust compliance and proactive engagement with the DOJ can yield favorable resolutions, including disgorgement of ill-gotten gains.

What to do next

  1. Review FCPA compliance policies and procedures for adequacy.
  2. Ensure robust mechanisms for voluntary self-disclosure and cooperation are in place.
  3. Evaluate remediation efforts following any identified misconduct.

Penalties

Disgorgement of approximately $1.2 million in profits.

Source document (simplified)

March 25, 2026

DOJ Issues First Declination under New Department-Wide CEP in FCPA Matter Involving Medical Equipment Manufacturer

Gina Castellano, Hyungjoo Han, Laura Perkins Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed

On March 19, 2026, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced that it was declining to prosecute Balt SAS, a France-based medical device company, and its subsidiary Balt USA LLC (together, “Balt”), in connection with an alleged foreign bribery scheme involving a physician at a state-owned hospital in France (“Balt declination” or “Balt declination letter”). The Balt declination is the first resolution under Part I of DOJ’s recently announced Department-wide Corporate Enforcement Policy (“CEP”). As part of the resolution, Balt has agreed to disgorge approximately $1.2 million in profits tied to the misconduct. Balt also entered into a parallel resolution with French authorities, which, per the DOJ declination letter, “will include corporate compliance requirements imposed under the French system.”

As set forth in the Balt declination letter, between approximately 2017 and 2023, Balt paid more than $600,000 in bribes to an employee of a French state-owned hospital to secure purchases of Balt medical devices. The payments were funneled through a third-party consultant in Belgium and were disguised as consulting fees and bonuses. Balt sought to conceal the scheme through the use of sham consulting agreements, fake invoices, and personal email accounts. The scheme generated approximately $1.68 million in revenue and roughly $1.21 million in profits for Balt.

DOJ found that Balt qualified for a declination under Part I of the CEP because it made a timely and voluntary self-disclosure to the Fraud Section, fully and proactively cooperated with the government’s investigation, timely and appropriately remediated, and lacked aggravating circumstances that “when weighed against Balt’s voluntary self-disclosure, cooperation, and remediation, would warrant a disposition other than a resolution under Part I of the CEP.” DOJ specifically cited Balt’s “accept[ance of] responsibility for the criminal conduct,” its agreement to continue cooperating with ongoing investigations and prosecutions, and its agreement to disgorge ill-gotten gains. In addition, DOJ highlighted Balt’s remediation efforts, including disciplining the individuals involved, ending the business relationships that gave rise to the misconduct, providing compliance training for senior management, and strengthening its compliance program and internal controls.

In many ways, the Balt declination does not appear to mark a new approach to corporate resolutions. Indeed, DOJ relied on the same core factors it emphasized in prior declinations (i.e., timely self-disclosure, full cooperation, appropriate remediation, no aggravating circumstances, and disgorgement of profits tied to the misconduct), which makes sense given how closely the new Department-wide CEP aligns with the framework that was previously in place under the Criminal Division’s CEP. Even so, the Balt matter is significant as the first example of how DOJ intends to apply the Department-wide policy in practice. The resolution suggests that when a company satisfies the standards set out in Part I of the CEP, DOJ will offer a declination as it has promised.

The resolution also reinforces a message DOJ has continued to emphasize: its desire to hold individuals accountable for misconduct. On March 4, 2026, a few weeks prior to the Balt declination, a federal grand jury indicted David Ferrera, a senior executive of Balt USA LLC, and Marc Tilman, a Belgium-based consultant, in connection with the bribery scheme at issue in the Balt declination, charging them with conspiracy to violate the FCPA, substantive FCPA violations, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and money laundering. In line with DOJ’s practice historically to decline to protect individuals as part of a corporate resolution, the Balt declination letter expressly states that it “does not provide any protection against prosecution of any individuals, regardless of their affiliation with Balt.” Furthermore, in announcing the resolution, Assistant Attorney General A. Tysen Duva emphasized that DOJ’s resolution “credits Balt’s self-report to the Department as well as its full cooperation and timely remediation” and that the indictment against Ferrera and Tilman “demonstrates the Criminal Division’s unwavering pursuit of culpable individuals that engage in corrupt conduct.”

Key Takeaways

Balt is the first company to receive a public declination under DOJ’s new Department-wide CEP, but the outcome is broadly consistent with DOJ’s previous approach under the Criminal Division’s CEP. This resolution reinforces the importance of having strong internal compliance systems, reporting channels, and prompt internal investigation procedures in place. At the same time, companies should not view self-disclosure as automatic or risk-free. Those decisions remain highly fact-specific and should be made carefully and with counsel. Finally, DOJ again made clear that leniency for a company does not mean leniency for the individuals involved. Even where a company meets DOJ’s standards for a declination, employees, executives, and agents tied to the misconduct still may face investigation and prosecution.

Send Print Report

Latest Posts

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Written by:

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP Contact + Follow Gina Castellano + Follow Hyungjoo Han + Follow Laura Perkins + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • ✔ Increased readership
  • ✔ Actionable analytics
  • ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Anti-Bribery + Follow Bribery + Follow Compliance + Follow Corporate Misconduct + Follow Criminal Prosecution + Follow Declination + Follow Department of Justice (DOJ) + Follow Disgorgement + Follow Enforcement Actions + Follow FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy (CEP) + Follow Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) + Follow Healthcare + Follow Medical Devices + Follow Pharmaceutical Industry + Follow Self-Disclosure Requirements + Follow White Collar Crimes + Follow General Business + Follow Criminal + Follow Health + Follow International Trade + Follow Science, Computers & Technology + Follow more less

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide

Named provisions

Corporate Enforcement Policy

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
FCC Industry Analysis
Filed
March 19th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive

Who this affects

Applies to
Drug manufacturers Medical device makers Pharmaceutical companies
Industry sector
3345 Medical Device Manufacturing 3254 Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Activity scope
Foreign Bribery FCPA Compliance
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Enforcement
Operational domain
Compliance
Compliance frameworks
FCPA
Topics
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Corporate Compliance

Get Trade & Sanctions alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when JD Supra Trade Law publishes new changes.

Optional. Personalizes your daily digest.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.