BIS Fines Vizocom $374,474 for Exporting Controlled Data to China
Summary
The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has fined Vizocom $374,474 for illegally exporting controlled technical data related to military antennas to a Chinese manufacturer. This action highlights the risks of non-compliance with export control regulations, particularly for defense contractors working with China.
What changed
The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has imposed a $374,474 civil penalty against Vizocom, a California-based satellite technology supplier. Vizocom was found to have unlawfully exported controlled technical data, classified under ECCN 3E611, related to military antennas to a Chinese manufacturer. This data was necessary for the production of antennas for a U.S. Navy contract, and its transmission to China required an export license, which Vizocom failed to obtain. The company allegedly uploaded detailed specifications to an online portal operated by the Chinese manufacturer to facilitate lower-cost production, despite the antennas having no civilian applications and being controlled for national security reasons.
This enforcement action serves as a critical warning to defense contractors and other entities handling controlled technical data, especially concerning dealings with China. It underscores that electronic transmissions, including uploads to foreign portals, constitute exports and are subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). Vizocom's attempt to mask the origin of the antennas by having a U.S. firm test and package them, while altering technical specification sheets, further compounded the violation. Companies must ensure robust compliance programs are in place to manage supply chain risks and prevent unauthorized exports of controlled technology, as cost pressures do not mitigate export control liability and can even be an aggravating factor.
What to do next
- Review all export control classifications for technical data shared with foreign entities, particularly China.
- Verify that all necessary export licenses are obtained before transmitting controlled technical data.
- Assess supply chain transparency and ensure accurate representation of product origin to government customers.
Penalties
Civil penalty of $374,474
Source document (simplified)
March 19, 2026
BIS Fines Navy Contractor for Illegally Sharing Controlled Military Specifications With Chinese Manufacturer
Mike Volkov The Volkov Law Group + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed
The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has imposed a $374,474 civil penalty against California-based satellite technology supplier Vizocom for unlawfully exporting controlled technical data related to military antennas to a Chinese manufacturer.
Although framed as a single Export Administration Regulations (EAR) violation, the enforcement action carries outsized compliance lessons — particularly for defense contractors navigating cost pressures, supply chain decisions, and export controls involving China.
The Conduct: Uploading Controlled Technical Data to China
According to BIS, Vizocom won a U.S. Navy contract to supply ultra-high frequency (UHF) antennas designed for military radios. The contract required the antennas to be manufactured by an American firm.
Instead, after securing the contract in 2019, Vizocom allegedly engaged a Chinese manufacturer to produce the antennas at significantly lower cost. BIS stated that Vizocom uploaded detailed antenna specifications to a “Made in China” online portal operated by the China-based manufacturer.
The specifications were controlled under the Export Administration Regulations and classified under Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 3E611, which covers certain military-related technical data controlled for national security and regional stability reasons. The antennas themselves were controlled under ECCN 3E611 and were described as having “no civilian applications.”
The uploaded information required an export license. None was obtained.
Under the EAR, the electronic transmission of controlled technical data to a foreign person — including through a web portal — constitutes an export. This case underscores that “uploads” are exports, and the medium does not change the legal obligation.
Cost Pressures and Compliance Failures
The enforcement order highlights the economic driver behind the violation.
BIS stated that Vizocom had received a quote from a U.S. manufacturer of approximately $165,000 to produce the antennas. The Chinese manufacturer allegedly offered to produce 500 antennas for $6 per unit — a dramatic cost differential.
The price disparity appears to have influenced the sourcing decision. But cost savings do not mitigate export control liability. In fact, economic motivation can become an aggravating factor where it reflects knowing or reckless conduct.
BIS further detailed “extensive correspondence” between Vizocom and the Chinese manufacturer regarding manufacturing details, including instructions that the antennas must match the external appearance exactly — including silver/nickel finish requirements.
The specificity of the communications reinforced that the technical data transmitted enabled production of a controlled military item.
Representation Issues and Supply Chain Transparency
Beyond the export violation itself, the enforcement order contains troubling allegations regarding how the antennas were presented to the Navy.
According to BIS, Vizocom arranged for a U.S. firm to test and package the antennas under its own name before delivering 450 units to the Navy. The company allegedly altered and modified technical specification sheets to represent that the antennas were produced by the U.S. firm rather than the Chinese manufacturer.
When a Navy official sought confirmation that the American company would build the antennas to specification, Vizocom reportedly responded affirmatively, stating the U.S. company had confirmed and fully tested the antennas.
While BIS’s penalty focused on the unauthorized export of technical data, the factual record suggests broader compliance and potential procurement integrity issues.
Settlement Terms and Compliance Consequences
Under the settlement:
- Vizocom will pay $374,474 in 20 installments over five years.
- The company is subject to a five-year probationary period.
- Failure to comply could result in revocation of export privileges or a BIS denial order. For government contractors, the threat of export privilege revocation can be existential. Access to global supply chains and international markets is often critical to operational viability.
Related Posts
- U.S. Issues New OFAC and BIS Guidance on Cuba: What Exporters Need to Know
- BIS Fines Thermal Camera Exporter $1 Million for China Export Violations: De Minimis Miscalculations and Compliance Gaps
- BIS Imposes $1.5 Million Penalty on Exyte for Unlicensed In-Country Transfers to SMIC
Latest Posts
- LRN’s 2026 Ethics & Compliance Program Effectiveness Report: Compliance at an Inflection Point
- BIS Fines Navy Contractor for Illegally Sharing Controlled Military Specifications With Chinese Manufacturer See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.
©
The Volkov Law Group
Written by:
The Volkov Law Group Contact + Follow Mike Volkov + Follow more less
PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA
- ✔ Increased readership
- ✔ Actionable analytics
- ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra
Published In:
Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) + Follow China + Follow Defense Contracts + Follow Defense Sector + Follow Enforcement Actions + Follow Export Administration Regulations (EAR) + Follow Export Controls + Follow Federal Contractors + Follow National Security + Follow Penalties + Follow Supply Chain + Follow U.S. Commerce Department + Follow U.S. Navy + Follow Government Contracting + Follow International Trade + Follow Military + Follow more less
The Volkov Law Group on:
"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide
CFR references
Named provisions
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Trade & Sanctions alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when JD Supra Trade Law publishes new changes.