IRS Legal Memo on Disclosure Statement and IRC Section 6103
Summary
The IRS issued Field Attorney Advice (FAA) GL-104768-24 addressing disclosure of partner personal information within partnership tax proceedings. The memo clarifies when sharing such information is permissible under IRC Section 6103, distinguishing between information received from outside the IRS and information generated internally.
What changed
This IRS Field Attorney Advice (FAA) memo, dated May 6, 2024, addresses the disclosure of partners' personal information within partnership tax proceedings, specifically concerning Appeals Referral Investigations (ARIs). It clarifies that disclosing partner personal information to the partnership is permissible under IRC Section 6103 if that information was received from outside the IRS as part of the partnership proceeding, as it then constitutes the partnership's return information. If the personal information was not received from outside the IRS, its disclosure is restricted by IRC Section 6103. The memo also states that redacting or withholding such internally generated, non-disclosable personal information from the full ARI results would not violate the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM).
The practical implication for tax professionals and IRS Appeals personnel is that they must carefully distinguish the source of partner personal information when deciding whether to disclose it to the partnership. Failure to adhere to these disclosure rules could lead to violations of IRC Section 6103. The memo emphasizes that this advice may not be used or cited as precedent, but it provides guidance on handling sensitive information in collection due process partnership cases where individual partner collectability is being assessed.
What to do next
- Review IRS Field Attorney Advice GL-104768-24 regarding disclosure of partner personal information.
- Distinguish between externally sourced and internally generated partner information when considering disclosure.
- Consult with the Office of Chief Counsel if disclosure of sensitive information is deemed necessary.
Source document (simplified)
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ ----------------- Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service memorandum Number: 20244101F Release Date: 10/11/2024 CC:SB:9:OKL:JBBINGHAM: GL-104768-24 UILC: 6103.00-00 date: May 06, 2024 to: Curtis R. Hoeltzel from: Jessica B. Bingham Attorney (Oklahoma City, Area #9) (Small Business/Self-Employed) subject: Taxpayer: SSN/EIN: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT This writing may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized disclosure of this writing may undermine our ability to protect the privileged information. If disclosure is determined to be necessary, please contact this office for our views. This memorandum may not be used or cited as precedent. ISSUE Four issues are addressed in this formal advice: (1) whether sharing the partners’ personal information that is included in the Appeals Referral Investigation (“ARI”) for the partnership would create an issue with I.R.C. section 6103; (2) whether sharing the partners’ personal information that is included in the ARI for the partnership would be a permissible disclosure under I.R.C. section 6103; (3) whether not sharing the full ARI results, due to redacting or removing information due to disclosure concerns, would violate the Internal Revenue Manual (“I.R.M”); and (4) what information can be shared by Appeals with the taxpayer partnership.
If the partner’s personal information that would be disclosed to the partnership was received from outside of the IRS as part of the partnership proceeding, then it is the partnership’s return information; there is not an I.R.C. section 6103 problem with disclosing the partnership’s return information to the partnership. If the partner’s personal information that would be disclosed to the partnership was not received from outside of the IRS as part of the partnership proceeding, then the partner’s personal information may be disclosed only as allowed by I.R.C. section 6103. Furthermore, the I.R.M. would not be violated by not sharing the full ARI results if the withheld information consisted of personal information of the partners that was not received from outside of the IRS as part of the partnership proceeding, and disclosure of the information was not authorized by I.R.C. section 6103. GL-104768-24 2 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSION Finally, Appeals’ ability to share information is potentially limited by I.R.C. section 6103. If the partner’s personal information that would be disclosed to the partnership was received from outside of the IRS as part of the partnership proceeding, then it is the partnership’s return information; there is not an I.R.C. section 6103 problem with disclosing the partnership’s return information to the partnership. If the partner’s personal information that would be disclosed to the partnership was not received from outside of the IRS as part of the partnership proceeding, then the partner’s personal FACTS AND ANALYSIS The following facts were taken from the request for advice via memorandum on March 12, 2024. In a collection due process partnership case, the requested resolution was a currently not collectible entity. An ARI was opened to Collection, and Collection agreed that the Business Master File was currently not collectible. However, because the entity was a partnership, Collection determined that the partners needed to be investigated, and a collection determination on each partner needed to be made. Upon completion, Collection determined that each partner had some collectability, and the ARI should not be closed as a defunct entity until Collection had exhausted the partners’ collectability. Significantly, the partnership ARI contained personal information of each partner and their collectability. As previously mentioned, Collection completed an ARI, which included investigating the partners of the partnership. Pursuant to I.R.M. section 8.23.3.4.1.4(8), the ARI results should be shared with the taxpayer. Even though the ARI results include information about the partners, the partnership is the taxpayer in this case. I.R.C. section 6103(e)(1)(C) provides that in the case of a partnership return, the return may be open to inspection or disclosed to “any person who was a member of such partnership during any part of the period covered by the return” upon written request. Another section of the I.R.M., section 11.3.2.4.2, provides that returns and return information of a partnership may be disclosed to any person who was a member of the partnership during any part of the period covered by the return. Thus, according to
However, to the extent that the ARI contains personal partner return and return information, there must be a determination of whether disclosing the partner’s personal information would create a problem with I.R.C. section 6103, and whether the disclosure is permissible. GL-104768-24 3 I.R.C. section 6103 and the I.R.M., the taxpayer partnership should receive the ARI results, and the partnership is authorized to receive the partnership return and return information that is contained in the ARI results. If the personal information of the partner that would be disclosed to the partnership was received from outside of the IRS as part of the partnership proceeding, then it is the partnership’s return information; there is not an I.R.C. section 6103 problem disclosing the partnership’s return information to the partnership. If the personal information of the partner that would be disclosed to the partnership was not received from outside of the IRS as part of the partnership proceeding, then the There are numerous subsections of I.R.C. section 6103 that serve as exceptions to the confidentiality requirement in I.R.C. section 6103(a), and one or more of these subsections could potentially apply to allow disclosure of the partners’ personal information in this case. While I.R.C. section 6103(e)(1)(C) provides for disclosing the partnership’s return to the partners, I.R.C. section 6103(e)(1)(C) does not provide for the disclosure of a partner’s return or return information to a partnership. Casa Investors, Ltd. V. Gibbs, No. CIV. 88-2485, 1990 WL 180703, at *5 (D.D.C. Oct. 11, 1990). Nevertheless, as previously noted, one or more of the subsections in I.R.C. section 6103 could potentially allow for the disclosure of the partners’ personal information. Restricting or sanitizing the ARI in order to comply with I.R.C. section 6103 would not result in failing to provide the ARI results to the taxpayer, the partnership. As previously noted, the ARI results should be shared with the taxpayer pursuant to I.R.M. section 8.23.3.4.1.4(8). However, I.R.M. section 11.3.2.4.2 provides a citation to an exhibit that contains detailed guidance about information that can be released to partners seeking access to a partnership return, including schedules that must be restricted or sanitized prior to release. Additionally, I.R.M. section 11.3.2.4.2 provides that any information in transcript form or in administrative files that may include other third-party information extracted from or attached to Form 1065 must also be evaluated in accordance with IRC 6103(e)(10). Even though this I.R.M. section does not specifically mention third-party information in an ARI, the intent underlying this I.R.M. section is to comply with the requirements of I.R.C. section 6103 by restricting or sanitizing documents. Consequently, restricting or sanitizing the ARI in order to comply with I.R.C. section 6103 would not result in failing to provide the ARI results to the taxpayer, the partnership, as required by I.R.M. 8.23.3.4.1.4(8).
If the partner’s personal information that would be disclosed to the partnership was received from outside of the IRS as part of the partnership proceeding, then it is the partnership’s return information; there is not an I.R.C. section 6103 problem with disclosing the partnership’s return information to the partnership. If the partner’s personal information that would be disclosed to the partnership was not received from outside of the IRS as part of the partnership proceeding, then the partner’s personal information may be disclosed only as allowed by I.R.C. section 6103. Secondly, the I.R.M. would not be violated by not sharing the full ARI results if the withheld information was the partner’s personal information, consisted of information that was not received from outside of the IRS as part of the partnership proceeding, and did not fall under an exception for disclosure under I.R.C. section 6103. Finally, Appeals ability to share information is potentially limited by I.R.C. section 6103. If the partner’s personal information that would be disclosed to the partnership was received from outside of the IRS as part of the partnership proceeding, then it is the partnership’s return information; there is not an I.R.C. section 6103 problem with disclosing the partnership’s return information to the partnership. If the partner’s personal information that would be disclosed to the partnership was not received from outside of the IRS as part of the partnership proceeding, then the partner’s personal We are closing our file on this matter. Please contact me via email or at 405-982- 6741 if you have additional questions. GL-104768-24 4 CONCLUSION VICKI L. MILLER Area Counsel (Small Business/Self-Employed: Area 9) By:_____________________________ JESSICA B. BINGHAM Attorney (Oklahoma City, Area #9) (Small Business/Self-Employed
CFR references
Named provisions
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Tax alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when IRS Field Attorney Advice publishes new changes.