Changeflow GovPing State Courts Minnesota Court of Appeals
Favicon for mncourts.gov

Minnesota Court of Appeals

RSS
Favicon for mncourts.gov

Snowman Construction v. Ceresota Funding II LLC - Civil Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision in a construction dispute between Snowman Construction and Ceresota Funding II LLC. The court found no error in the admission of evidence, the handling of spoliation claims, findings of fact, or damage awards.

Routine Enforcement Product Safety
Favicon for mncourts.gov

Nesbit v. Covel-Paulzine - Property Partition Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals has filed a nonprecedential opinion in the case of Nesbit v. Covel-Paulzine. The court remanded the case to the district court for additional findings regarding the partition of a jointly owned property and the equitable allocation of sale proceeds.

Routine Enforcement Real Estate
Favicon for mncourts.gov

N A Brothers LLC v. Werts - UPEPA Application in Defamation Case

The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a district court's denial of a special motion to dismiss under the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA). The court found that UPEPA should have been applied to claims of defamation and conspiracy brought by a childcare provider against former employees and parents.

Priority review Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for mncourts.gov

Marriage Dissolution Appeal Opinion

The Minnesota Court of Appeals filed a nonprecedential opinion on March 9, 2026, in the marriage dissolution appeal of DeGolier v. Baron. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case concerning post-dissolution motions related to custody, child support, and spousal maintenance.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for mncourts.gov

Custody Case Affirmed by Minnesota Court of Appeals

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to modify a father's parenting time, reducing it to supervised visits. The court found no abuse of discretion in the district court's consideration of evidence and best-interest factors for the child.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for mncourts.gov

Douglass v. Olson - Marriage Dissolution Case Affirmed

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to modify a marriage dissolution judgment, awarding sole legal and physical custody of a child to the mother. The court found no error in the district court's modification order, which was based on evidence presented regarding the child's well-being.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for mncourts.gov

Hogendorf vs. Green - Environmental Liability and Attorney Fees

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's judgment awarding attorney fees and costs to respondent Renee Hogendorf against appellants James Green Jr. and Well Groomed Lawns, Inc. The court found no error in the award of fees and costs under the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA).

Routine Enforcement Environmental Protection
Favicon for mncourts.gov

Kuller v. TVI, Inc. - Unemployment Benefits Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a decision denying unemployment benefits to Kenneth Kuller. The court found that Kuller engaged in employment misconduct by exploiting a coupon policy and falsifying transactions, making him ineligible for approximately $6,000 in benefits.

Routine Enforcement Employment & Labor
Favicon for mncourts.gov

Donald D. Kern v. New Century Systems Inc. - Unemployment Benefits Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a decision denying unemployment benefits to Donald D. Kern. The court found that Kern quit his employment without good reason caused by his employer and did not receive a fair hearing. The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026.

Routine Enforcement Employment & Labor
Favicon for mncourts.gov

State of Minnesota v. Anthony Dimitri Limogianni - Criminal Sexual Conduct Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals filed a nonprecedential opinion affirming a conviction for criminal sexual conduct. The court found that the district court did not err in concluding that the appellant waived any objection to the closure of the courtroom during the victim's testimony.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice

Showing 1–10 of 46 changes

1 2 3 5

Get Minnesota Court of Appeals alerts

We'll email you when Minnesota Court of Appeals publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.