Anthony Davis v. State of Florida - Rule 3.800 Motion Denial
Summary
The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of a rule 3.800 motion filed by appellant Anthony Davis. The court's decision, dated March 12, 2026, upholds the lower court's ruling in case number 4D2025-3442.
What changed
The Florida District Court of Appeal, in case number 4D2025-3442, has affirmed the lower court's decision to deny a rule 3.800 motion filed by appellant Anthony Davis. The specific nature of the rule 3.800 motion, which typically relates to post-conviction relief or sentencing correction, was not detailed, but the appellate court found no grounds to overturn the circuit court's denial.
This ruling means the prior decision stands, and the appellant's request for relief under rule 3.800 has been unsuccessful. For legal professionals involved in criminal appeals or post-conviction matters in Florida, this case serves as an example of how such motions are reviewed at the appellate level. No new compliance actions or deadlines are imposed by this appellate affirmation.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 12, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Anthony Davis v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 4D2025-3442
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
ANTHONY DAVIS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-3442
[March 12, 2026]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Timothy Lawrence
Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 90-5512CF10A.
David Milo Lamos, Fort Pierce, for appellant.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
CONNER, FORST and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get State Courts alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.