Changeflow GovPing State Courts People v. Griffin - Appellate Division Opinion
Routine Enforcement Removed Final

People v. Griffin - Appellate Division Opinion

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com New York Appellate Division
Filed March 11th, 2026
Detected March 12th, 2026
Email

Summary

The New York Appellate Division denied an application for a writ of error coram nobis, which sought to vacate a prior decision affirming a judgment based on ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The court found the appellant failed to establish the claim.

What changed

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, in the case of People v. Griffin, issued a decision on March 11, 2026, denying an application for a writ of error coram nobis. The application sought to vacate a prior decision that affirmed a judgment, alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The court found that the appellant failed to establish the grounds for such a claim, citing relevant legal precedents.

This decision is a final ruling on the specific application made by the appellant. For legal professionals and criminal defendants involved in similar appeals, this case reinforces the high standard required to prove ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. No new compliance actions or deadlines are imposed by this ruling, as it pertains to a specific post-conviction application.

Source document (simplified)

Jump To

Top Caption Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 11, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Add Note

People v. Griffin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Combined Opinion

People v Griffin (2026 NY Slip Op 01376)
| People v Griffin |
| 2026 NY Slip Op 01376 |
| Decided on March 11, 2026 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |

Decided on March 11, 2026
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
MARK C. DILLON
PHILLIP HOM
ELENA GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ.
2004-11080
(Ind. No. 328/04)

*[1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Kevin Griffin, appellant.**

Kevin Griffin, Woodbourne, NY, appellant pro se.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, NY (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 11, 2006 (People v Griffin, 28 AD3d 578), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered November 22, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).

LASALLE, P.J., DILLON, HOM and GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Federal and State Courts
Filed
March 11th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals Criminal defendants
Geographic scope
State (New York)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Criminal Justice
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Appellate Procedure Legal Counsel

Get State Courts alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when New York Appellate Division publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.